Postoperative Psychoses in Patients with Brain Gliomas

O. S. Zaitsev, N. P. Ilyaev, O. A. Maksakova
{"title":"Postoperative Psychoses in Patients with Brain Gliomas","authors":"O. S. Zaitsev, N. P. Ilyaev, O. A. Maksakova","doi":"10.30629/2618-6667-2023-21-7-65-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: despite the widespread opinion that psychoses are common after surgery in neurosurgical patients, they remain practically unexplored to date.  Objective: based on the analysis of scientific literature to get an idea of the state and prospects of studying the problem of psychoses arising after operations for brain gliomas.  Materials and methods: the work is a scoping review; the main method used was the search for publications by the keywords “postoperative psychosis”, “postoperative delirium ”, “brain gliomas”, “neurosurgery”, “craniotomy” conducted in the Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, RISC and other sources over the past 20 years.  Conclusion: studies of postoperative psychoses in patients with brain gliomas and comparison of results in neurosurgery and general surgical practice are hindered by terminological dissonance and shortcomings of various types of verification of postoperative psychotic disorders. This manifests itself both at the epidemiological data (the probability of occurrence ranges from 4 to 29%), and in determining the risk factors necessary and sufficient to predict the onset of psychosis: according to literature data. About 80 indicators claim this role (gender, age, premorbid diseases, preoperative mental state,  tumor malignancy, options for neurosurgical interventions, etc.) while the list does not contain conceptually important features, such as the profile of individual brain asymmetr y, tumor lateralization, etc. These problems lead to controversy in approaches to treatment and prevention of postoperative psychotic disorders. Before evaluating the effectiveness of the main drugs (dexmedetomidine, GABA-ergics, antipsychotics, etc.) and non-drugs influences, one must understand the phenomenon clearly with all the individual characteristics and variants of disease manifestations.","PeriodicalId":516298,"journal":{"name":"Psikhiatriya","volume":"76 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikhiatriya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/2618-6667-2023-21-7-65-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: despite the widespread opinion that psychoses are common after surgery in neurosurgical patients, they remain practically unexplored to date.  Objective: based on the analysis of scientific literature to get an idea of the state and prospects of studying the problem of psychoses arising after operations for brain gliomas.  Materials and methods: the work is a scoping review; the main method used was the search for publications by the keywords “postoperative psychosis”, “postoperative delirium ”, “brain gliomas”, “neurosurgery”, “craniotomy” conducted in the Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, RISC and other sources over the past 20 years.  Conclusion: studies of postoperative psychoses in patients with brain gliomas and comparison of results in neurosurgery and general surgical practice are hindered by terminological dissonance and shortcomings of various types of verification of postoperative psychotic disorders. This manifests itself both at the epidemiological data (the probability of occurrence ranges from 4 to 29%), and in determining the risk factors necessary and sufficient to predict the onset of psychosis: according to literature data. About 80 indicators claim this role (gender, age, premorbid diseases, preoperative mental state,  tumor malignancy, options for neurosurgical interventions, etc.) while the list does not contain conceptually important features, such as the profile of individual brain asymmetr y, tumor lateralization, etc. These problems lead to controversy in approaches to treatment and prevention of postoperative psychotic disorders. Before evaluating the effectiveness of the main drugs (dexmedetomidine, GABA-ergics, antipsychotics, etc.) and non-drugs influences, one must understand the phenomenon clearly with all the individual characteristics and variants of disease manifestations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑胶质瘤患者的术后精神病
背景:尽管普遍认为神经外科患者术后常见精神病,但迄今为止实际上仍未对其进行研究。 目的:基于对科学文献的分析,了解脑胶质瘤术后精神病问题的研究现状和前景。 材料和方法:本研究为范围综述;主要方法是通过关键词 "术后精神病"、"术后谵妄"、"脑胶质瘤"、"神经外科"、"开颅手术 "搜索过去 20 年间在 Medline/PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、RISC 和其他来源发表的文献。 结论:对脑胶质瘤患者术后精神病的研究,以及对神经外科和普通外科手术结果的比较,都受到术语不统一和各种术后精神病验证缺陷的阻碍。这既表现在流行病学数据上(发生概率从4%到29%不等),也表现在确定必要且足以预测精神病发病的风险因素上:根据文献数据。约有 80 项指标(性别、年龄、病前疾病、术前精神状态、肿瘤恶性程度、神经外科干预方案等)要求发挥这一作用,而这些指标并不包含概念上的重要特征,如个体大脑不对称的概况、肿瘤侧位等。这些问题导致术后精神障碍的治疗和预防方法存在争议。在评估主要药物(右美托咪定、GABA-激动剂、抗精神病药等)和非药物影响的有效性之前,必须清楚地了解这一现象的所有个体特征和疾病表现的变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Family Experience and Environment on Alcohol Use in Patients with Mental Disorders Mood Disorders in Schizotypal Disorder with Leading Syndrome of Eating Disorders Psychometric Properties of the Russian Version of the Somatic Symptom Disorder — B Criteria Scale Age-Related Development During Predictors and Clinical Neurodiagnostic Criteria of Cognitive Impairment in the General Medical Network The Foundations and Practice of Neuropsychological Diagnostics in the Context of Forensic Psychiatric Examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1