Lateral Earth Pressure Reduction on High-Filled Cut-and-Cover Tunnels Using Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam and Tire-Derived Aggregate

Mohammad Hajiazizi, S. Flamarz
{"title":"Lateral Earth Pressure Reduction on High-Filled Cut-and-Cover Tunnels Using Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam and Tire-Derived Aggregate","authors":"Mohammad Hajiazizi, S. Flamarz","doi":"10.24271/psr.2024.433607.1461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, high-filled cut-and-cover tunnels (HFCCTs) are a practical solution for the prospect of reclaiming valuable usable lands with valleys and hilly terrain around the world. As a result of the very high backfill soil amount above the HFCCT producing very huge earth pressure, it is essential to use methods of load reduction methods to reduce the earth loads and pressures on the HFCCT, which will increase the safety by reducing the tunnel designing loads. This study focuses on six load reduction scenarios using expanded polystyrene (EPS) and tire-derived aggregate (TDA) in three different forms. The research includes using EPS geofoam and TDA in arch and combined horizontal and arch formations as methods of LEP reduction on HFCCTs which is the first time these methods have been used as methods of any type of load reduction on HFCCTs. A number of significant factors, including the suggested EPS and TDA forms, the EPS and TDA thickness, and the distance between the bottom of the EPS or the TDA and the top of the HFCCT were studied. The study results determined that a significant LEP reduction on the HFCCTs was achieved, especially with the use of TDA in a horizontal form. Also, model verification was made by comparison between the calculated and estimated LEP values on the HFCCT study model using the Rankine equation, Rankine modified equation, and Abaqus CAE 2019 software. The calculated and estimated LEP values showed that the calculated value using the Rankine modified equation is 23.61% lower than the calculated value using the Rankine equation, which is a high percentage of difference. The estimated value using Abaqus CAE 2019 is 47.56% higher than the calculated value using the Rankine equation, which is also a high percentage of difference. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/","PeriodicalId":508608,"journal":{"name":"Passer Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":"248 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passer Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24271/psr.2024.433607.1461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, high-filled cut-and-cover tunnels (HFCCTs) are a practical solution for the prospect of reclaiming valuable usable lands with valleys and hilly terrain around the world. As a result of the very high backfill soil amount above the HFCCT producing very huge earth pressure, it is essential to use methods of load reduction methods to reduce the earth loads and pressures on the HFCCT, which will increase the safety by reducing the tunnel designing loads. This study focuses on six load reduction scenarios using expanded polystyrene (EPS) and tire-derived aggregate (TDA) in three different forms. The research includes using EPS geofoam and TDA in arch and combined horizontal and arch formations as methods of LEP reduction on HFCCTs which is the first time these methods have been used as methods of any type of load reduction on HFCCTs. A number of significant factors, including the suggested EPS and TDA forms, the EPS and TDA thickness, and the distance between the bottom of the EPS or the TDA and the top of the HFCCT were studied. The study results determined that a significant LEP reduction on the HFCCTs was achieved, especially with the use of TDA in a horizontal form. Also, model verification was made by comparison between the calculated and estimated LEP values on the HFCCT study model using the Rankine equation, Rankine modified equation, and Abaqus CAE 2019 software. The calculated and estimated LEP values showed that the calculated value using the Rankine modified equation is 23.61% lower than the calculated value using the Rankine equation, which is a high percentage of difference. The estimated value using Abaqus CAE 2019 is 47.56% higher than the calculated value using the Rankine equation, which is also a high percentage of difference. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用膨胀聚苯乙烯土工泡沫和轮胎衍生骨料降低高填方明挖回填隧道的侧向土压力
目前,高填方明挖回填隧道(HFCCT)是一种切实可行的解决方案,有望在世界各地的山谷和丘陵地带开垦出宝贵的可用土地。由于高明挖回填式隧道上方的回填土量非常大,会产生巨大的土压力,因此必须采用减载方法来降低高明挖回填式隧道的土荷载和土压力,从而通过降低隧道设计荷载来提高安全性。本研究重点研究了六种减载方案,分别采用三种不同形式的发泡聚苯乙烯(EPS)和轮胎衍生骨料(TDA)。研究包括使用 EPS 土工泡沫和 TDA 在拱形以及水平和拱形组合形式中作为减少高频海底隧道 LEP 的方法,这是首次使用这些方法作为减少高频海底隧道荷载的任何类型的方法。研究了一些重要因素,包括建议的 EPS 和 TDA 形式、EPS 和 TDA 厚度以及 EPS 或 TDA 底部与 HFCCT 顶部之间的距离。研究结果表明,HFCCT 的 LEP 显著降低,尤其是采用水平形式的 TDA 时。此外,通过使用朗肯方程、朗肯修正方程和 Abaqus CAE 2019 软件对 HFCCT 研究模型的计算值和估计 LEP 值进行比较,对模型进行了验证。计算值和估计 LEP 值显示,使用 Rankine 修正方程的计算值比使用 Rankine 方程的计算值低 23.61%,相差比例较高。使用 Abaqus CAE 2019 的估计值比使用 Rankine 方程的计算值高 47.56%,差异百分比也很高。https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of Derived and Previously Published Models for Estimating Annual Runoff in the Mountainous Watersheds of Sulaimani Province Machine Learning Models for Predicting Flexural Behavior of FRP-Strengthened RC Beams Molecular identification, Prevalence, and Phylogeny of Burkholderia cepacia Complex (BCC) Species in the Respiratory Tract of Hospitalized Patients Effect of temperature on the reaction of pristine and Au-doped SnO2 pyramid clusters with H2: A transition state theory study Personality Traits and Language Learning Strategies among EFL Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1