An Individualized Educational Package for Improving Knowledge and Practices of Caregivers of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Quasiexperimental Study

IF 0.2 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Indian Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1778732
Indu Punia, Manju A. K. Rajora, D. Khakha, Deepak Agarwal
{"title":"An Individualized Educational Package for Improving Knowledge and Practices of Caregivers of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Quasiexperimental Study","authors":"Indu Punia, Manju A. K. Rajora, D. Khakha, Deepak Agarwal","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1778732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction Globally, traumatic spinal cord injury occurs at a rate of 13 to 53 cases per million populations. These patients tend to get dependent on hospital staff as well as caregivers for their activities of daily living. There are insufficient data available on whether the caregivers have adequate knowledge and required skills to perform the same.\n Aim Our aim was to evaluate the impact of an individualized educational package on the knowledge and practices of caregivers of patients with spinal cord injury.\n Methods The caregivers (n = 30) were recruited in the quasi-experimental study by using a nonequivalent, control group design using the TREND checklist. Study subjects were divided into two groups, that is, control and experimental. The intervention was delivered through an educational package in the experimental group, and no intervention was given to the control group. The educational package was delivered by dedicated registered nurse. Ethical approval was taken from the ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from the study participants. Data were analyzed using STATA version 16 and SPSS version 20.\n Result The mean age of patients was 34.6 + 2.7 years, and majority (90%) were males. The most common cause of spinal cord injury was fall from height in 53.3% patients followed by road traffic accidents in 36.6% patients. The mean posttest knowledge score (30.7 + 8.6) of subjects in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (18.4 + 5.3). Also, the mean posttest practice score (54.3 + 9) of subjects in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (35.9 + 6.8).\n Conclusion Educating caregivers (relatives) can dramatically improve the quality of life of patients as well as prevent complications and rehospitalizations. A dedicated nurse educator should be posted in spinal cord injury wards to deliver such educational packages.","PeriodicalId":43198,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1778732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Globally, traumatic spinal cord injury occurs at a rate of 13 to 53 cases per million populations. These patients tend to get dependent on hospital staff as well as caregivers for their activities of daily living. There are insufficient data available on whether the caregivers have adequate knowledge and required skills to perform the same. Aim Our aim was to evaluate the impact of an individualized educational package on the knowledge and practices of caregivers of patients with spinal cord injury. Methods The caregivers (n = 30) were recruited in the quasi-experimental study by using a nonequivalent, control group design using the TREND checklist. Study subjects were divided into two groups, that is, control and experimental. The intervention was delivered through an educational package in the experimental group, and no intervention was given to the control group. The educational package was delivered by dedicated registered nurse. Ethical approval was taken from the ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from the study participants. Data were analyzed using STATA version 16 and SPSS version 20. Result The mean age of patients was 34.6 + 2.7 years, and majority (90%) were males. The most common cause of spinal cord injury was fall from height in 53.3% patients followed by road traffic accidents in 36.6% patients. The mean posttest knowledge score (30.7 + 8.6) of subjects in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (18.4 + 5.3). Also, the mean posttest practice score (54.3 + 9) of subjects in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (35.9 + 6.8). Conclusion Educating caregivers (relatives) can dramatically improve the quality of life of patients as well as prevent complications and rehospitalizations. A dedicated nurse educator should be posted in spinal cord injury wards to deliver such educational packages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善脊髓损伤患者护理人员知识和实践的个性化教育包:一项准实验研究
导言 在全球范围内,创伤性脊髓损伤的发病率为每百万人口 13 至 53 例。这些患者的日常生活往往依赖于医院工作人员和护理人员。至于护理人员是否具备足够的知识和所需的技能来完成这些工作,目前还没有足够的数据。目的 我们的目的是评估个性化教育包对脊髓损伤患者护理人员的知识和实践的影响。方法 采用非等效对照组设计,使用 TREND 检查表,招募照顾者(n = 30)进行准实验研究。研究对象分为两组,即对照组和实验组。实验组通过教育包进行干预,对照组不进行干预。教育包由专门的注册护士提供。研究获得了伦理委员会的伦理批准,并获得了研究参与者的知情同意。数据使用 STATA 16 版和 SPSS 20 版进行分析。结果 患者的平均年龄为 34.6 + 2.7 岁,大多数(90%)为男性。最常见的脊髓损伤原因是高处坠落,占 53.3%,其次是道路交通事故,占 36.6%。实验组受试者的测试后知识平均得分(30.7 + 8.6)明显高于对照组(18.4 + 5.3)。此外,实验组受试者的测试后实践平均得分(54.3 + 9)也明显高于对照组(35.9 + 6.8)。结论 对护理人员(亲属)进行教育可显著提高患者的生活质量,预防并发症和再次住院。应在脊髓损伤病房派驻专职护士教育者,提供此类教育套餐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Neurotrauma and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Homer's Poems Impact of Single Blast Exposure on Neuronal Damage and Protein Levels in the Rat Brain at Varying Pressures An Unusual Case of Teeth in Neck: An Interesting Case Report Cognitive Outcomes following Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Patient with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Techniques and Surgical Nuances of Management of Comminuted Fronto-Orbital Depressed Fractures: A Single-Surgeon Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1