А. Revishvili, S. Golitsyn, S. Aksentiev, А. Amiraslanov, А. Artyukhina, D. Duplyakov, Е. Zubov, Е. Isaeva, А. Loginova, Т. Malkina, G. Miloserdov, А. Rivin, S. Teplykh, I. Tsygankova, Yu. Shvarts, Y. Yuricheva, S. Kanorsky, S. Sokolov
{"title":"A comparative study of lappaconitine hydrobromide extended release and propafenone in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation","authors":"А. Revishvili, S. Golitsyn, S. Aksentiev, А. Amiraslanov, А. Artyukhina, D. Duplyakov, Е. Zubov, Е. Isaeva, А. Loginova, Т. Malkina, G. Miloserdov, А. Rivin, S. Teplykh, I. Tsygankova, Yu. Shvarts, Y. Yuricheva, S. Kanorsky, S. Sokolov","doi":"10.29296/25877305-2024-01-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new dosage form of lappaconitine hydrobromide has been created – the long-acting drug Allaforte®, which has fewer side effects compared to the traditional dosage form (Allapinin®).\nObjective. To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Allaforte® therapy in comparison with the drug Rytmonorm® in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).\nMaterial and methods. Patients who met the inclusion criteria and those who did not meet the non-inclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups: 1st (n=50) – \npatients received Allaforte® 25 mg 3 times a day with an increase in dose to \n50 mg 2 times a day when detected attack of AF; 2nd (n=50) – patients received Rytmonorm® 150 mg 3 times a day with an increase in dose to 300 mg 2 times a day if an attack of AF was detected.\nResults. The average time from the first dose of the drug to the development of AF paroxysm in the 1st group (Allaforte®) was 98.877±6.022 days, in the 2nd group (Rytmonorm®) – 98.808±5.876 days, the average time from the first dose of the drug to the completion of the study – 105.740±5.032 and 103.732±5.353 days, respectively. The drugs Allaforte® and Rytmonorm® equally improved the quality of life of patients. A comparative analysis in groups according to the severity of adverse events and their cause-and-effect relationship with the drug did not show significant differences.\nConclusion. The study drugs showed comparable effectiveness in preventing attacks of AF with similar safety and tolerability.","PeriodicalId":23748,"journal":{"name":"Vrach","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vrach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2024-01-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A new dosage form of lappaconitine hydrobromide has been created – the long-acting drug Allaforte®, which has fewer side effects compared to the traditional dosage form (Allapinin®).
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Allaforte® therapy in comparison with the drug Rytmonorm® in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
Material and methods. Patients who met the inclusion criteria and those who did not meet the non-inclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups: 1st (n=50) –
patients received Allaforte® 25 mg 3 times a day with an increase in dose to
50 mg 2 times a day when detected attack of AF; 2nd (n=50) – patients received Rytmonorm® 150 mg 3 times a day with an increase in dose to 300 mg 2 times a day if an attack of AF was detected.
Results. The average time from the first dose of the drug to the development of AF paroxysm in the 1st group (Allaforte®) was 98.877±6.022 days, in the 2nd group (Rytmonorm®) – 98.808±5.876 days, the average time from the first dose of the drug to the completion of the study – 105.740±5.032 and 103.732±5.353 days, respectively. The drugs Allaforte® and Rytmonorm® equally improved the quality of life of patients. A comparative analysis in groups according to the severity of adverse events and their cause-and-effect relationship with the drug did not show significant differences.
Conclusion. The study drugs showed comparable effectiveness in preventing attacks of AF with similar safety and tolerability.