America’s “Narrative of Combating the COVID-19 Pandemic” in “Post-truth” Context

Shimi Xu, Xiao Han, Xueru Zhang
{"title":"America’s “Narrative of Combating the COVID-19 Pandemic” in “Post-truth” Context","authors":"Shimi Xu, Xiao Han, Xueru Zhang","doi":"10.5539/ass.v20n1p21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some US politicians and media, driven by the zero-sum Cold War mentality, ideological bias, and domestic political needs, have made no effort to politicize, stigmatize, and label the epidemic with the “post-truth” narrative logic of “promoting values and belittling the epidemic” in order to hide the institutional impotence and political incompetence exposed by the epidemic response and mitigate the impact of the comparison between “China’s governance” and “chaos in the United States.” The U.S. narrative of fighting COVID-19 was based on fabrications, fallacies, and hegemonic construction, which involved scapegoating others and assigning blame. The US “anti-epidemic narrative” is essentially a weapon to use fallacies to cut reality, fabricate history with lies, and suppress China with hegemony. The “anti-epidemic narrative” of the US is that it is dissatisfied with everything about China, regards China as being behind the times, and is hostile to both the Communist Party and Marxism. It is a denial of China’s strategy, direction, and system. The best method to combat the global public health crisis is to improve global public health governance, increase international cooperation against COVID-19, jointly build a “Silk Road for health,” and create a community of health for all people. Additionally, they contribute to revising the US “narrative against COVID-19.”","PeriodicalId":89741,"journal":{"name":"Asian social science","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian social science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v20n1p21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some US politicians and media, driven by the zero-sum Cold War mentality, ideological bias, and domestic political needs, have made no effort to politicize, stigmatize, and label the epidemic with the “post-truth” narrative logic of “promoting values and belittling the epidemic” in order to hide the institutional impotence and political incompetence exposed by the epidemic response and mitigate the impact of the comparison between “China’s governance” and “chaos in the United States.” The U.S. narrative of fighting COVID-19 was based on fabrications, fallacies, and hegemonic construction, which involved scapegoating others and assigning blame. The US “anti-epidemic narrative” is essentially a weapon to use fallacies to cut reality, fabricate history with lies, and suppress China with hegemony. The “anti-epidemic narrative” of the US is that it is dissatisfied with everything about China, regards China as being behind the times, and is hostile to both the Communist Party and Marxism. It is a denial of China’s strategy, direction, and system. The best method to combat the global public health crisis is to improve global public health governance, increase international cooperation against COVID-19, jointly build a “Silk Road for health,” and create a community of health for all people. Additionally, they contribute to revising the US “narrative against COVID-19.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后真相 "背景下的美国 "抗击 COVID-19 大流行叙事
美国一些政客和媒体在零和冷战思维、意识形态偏见和国内政治需要的驱使下,以 "弘扬价值观、贬低疫情 "的 "后真相 "叙事逻辑,不遗余力地将疫情政治化、污名化、标签化,以掩盖疫情应对所暴露出的制度无能和政治无能,减轻 "中国之治 "与 "美国之乱 "的对比影响。美国抗击 COVID-19 的叙事建立在捏造、谬误和霸权建构的基础之上,其中包括将他人作为替罪羊并嫁祸于人。美国的 "抗疫叙事 "本质上是以谬论割裂现实、以谎言编造历史、以霸权压制中国的武器。美国的 "反疫情叙事 "就是对中国的一切都不满意,认为中国落后于时代,敌视共产党,敌视马克思主义。这是对中国战略、方向和制度的否定。应对全球公共卫生危机的最佳方法是完善全球公共卫生治理,加强应对 COVID-19 的国际合作,共建 "健康丝绸之路",打造全民健康共同体。此外,他们还为修正美国 "反对 COVID-19 的论述 "做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Correlation Between the Participation of Flipped Classroom and the Pleasure and Boredom of Non-English Majors in Foreign Language Classroom Evaluation of Sustainable Strategic Value of Clothing Brand Based on Maxdiff Factors Impacting Employment Opportunities and Outcomes for Individuals with Disabilities in Nepal Unifying Historical-Research and Drama-Interpretation: A Methodological Exploration of Textile Historical Materials in Chinese Classical Dramatic Literature Adaptation Strategies Through Mining Compensation in Mabayi Commune, Burundi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1