Development of Personas and Journey Maps for School EdTech Purchase Decision-Making

Seonghye Yoon, J. Kong
{"title":"Development of Personas and Journey Maps for School EdTech Purchase Decision-Making","authors":"Seonghye Yoon, J. Kong","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.2.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aims to explore ways to support evidence-based and rational decision-making in EdTech purchases within the context of public education in South Korea. This will be achieved by analyzing the deci-sion-making experiences of teachers involved in EdTech procurement in the field of public education. \nMethods To understand the educators' experiences related to EdTech purchase decision-making, this study con-ducted in-depth interviews with seven primary and secondary school teachers involved in their schools’ EdTech procurement processes. For the interview, participant selection was carried out using purposeful sampling. Based on the results of the interview, this study developed personas and journey maps, aligning them with the stages of the consumer behavior model proposed by Blackwell, Miniard, and Engel(2006). Additionally, a validity assess-ment was conducted with three experts to validate the developed personas and journey maps. \nResults This study examined the EdTech purchase decision-making process within the consumer behavior framework, as Blackwell, Miniard, and Engel(2006) proposed. This study identified four distinct educator persona types and created persona-based EdTech purchase decision journey maps. \nConclusions According to the research findings, the EdTech purchase decision-making process in school settings can be categorized into bottom-top and top-bottom motivation based on the recognition of need, and it varies even among schools within the same grade level. This result indicates the need for a systematic data-based, or generalized decision-making framework within school environments. Based on these findings, this study dis-cusses the importance of fostering a culture of open EdTech utilization and the necessity of related policies and practical support to promote evidence-based EdTech decision-making.","PeriodicalId":414671,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":"64 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.2.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to explore ways to support evidence-based and rational decision-making in EdTech purchases within the context of public education in South Korea. This will be achieved by analyzing the deci-sion-making experiences of teachers involved in EdTech procurement in the field of public education. Methods To understand the educators' experiences related to EdTech purchase decision-making, this study con-ducted in-depth interviews with seven primary and secondary school teachers involved in their schools’ EdTech procurement processes. For the interview, participant selection was carried out using purposeful sampling. Based on the results of the interview, this study developed personas and journey maps, aligning them with the stages of the consumer behavior model proposed by Blackwell, Miniard, and Engel(2006). Additionally, a validity assess-ment was conducted with three experts to validate the developed personas and journey maps. Results This study examined the EdTech purchase decision-making process within the consumer behavior framework, as Blackwell, Miniard, and Engel(2006) proposed. This study identified four distinct educator persona types and created persona-based EdTech purchase decision journey maps. Conclusions According to the research findings, the EdTech purchase decision-making process in school settings can be categorized into bottom-top and top-bottom motivation based on the recognition of need, and it varies even among schools within the same grade level. This result indicates the need for a systematic data-based, or generalized decision-making framework within school environments. Based on these findings, this study dis-cusses the importance of fostering a culture of open EdTech utilization and the necessity of related policies and practical support to promote evidence-based EdTech decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为学校教育技术购买决策制定人物角色和旅程地图
研究目的 本研究旨在探讨如何在韩国公共教育领域的教育技术采购中支持循证和合理的决策。这将通过分析参与公共教育领域教育技术采购的教师的决策经验来实现。方法 为了了解教育工作者在教育技术采购决策方面的经验,本研究对参与学校教育技术采购过程的七名中小学教师进行了深入访谈。在访谈中,我们采用了有目的的抽样方法来选择参与者。在访谈结果的基础上,本研究根据 Blackwell、Miniard 和 Engel(2006 年)提出的消费者行为模型的各个阶段,开发了 "角色 "和 "旅程图"。此外,还与三位专家进行了有效性评估,以验证所开发的 "角色 "和 "旅程图"。结果 本研究根据 Blackwell、Miniard 和 Engel(2006 年)提出的消费者行为框架,对教育技术购买决策过程进行了研究。本研究确定了四种不同的教育者角色类型,并绘制了基于角色的教育技术购买决策旅程图。结论 根据研究结果,学校环境中的教育技术购买决策过程可根据对需求的认识分为自下而上和自上而下两种动机,即使在同一年级的不同学校中也存在差异。这一结果表明,在学校环境中需要一个基于数据的系统化或通用化决策框架。基于这些发现,本研究讨论了培养开放式教育技术应用文化的重要性,以及相关政策和实际支持对促进循证教育技术决策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding social discourse and current status of liberal arts subjects in colleges through text mining-based data analysis Exploring the MSCI Participation Experience of Secondary School Preparatory Career Teachers and Ways to Apply it to Schools: Focusing on the Experience of Program Participants Enrolled in a Career Counseling Minor Training Course Exploring the Perception of Characteristics between MZ Generation and Established Generation Kindergarten Teachers The Development of Instructional Design Principles for Convergence Education with EduTech A Study on the Development and Validation of Scale of CSFT(College Student of Failure Tolerance): Structural relationship of Failure Tolerance, Grit and Academic amotivation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1