The impact of marketization on school segregation and educational equity and effectiveness: Evidence from Australia and Canada

Laura B. Perry, Ee-Seul Yoon, M. Sciffer, Christopher Lubienski
{"title":"The impact of marketization on school segregation and educational equity and effectiveness: Evidence from Australia and Canada","authors":"Laura B. Perry, Ee-Seul Yoon, M. Sciffer, Christopher Lubienski","doi":"10.1177/00207152241227810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While marketization has been promoted as a mechanism for improving educational equity and effectiveness, substantial evidence suggests that it may have the opposite effect. We contribute to this debate by examining educational equity and effectiveness in two similar countries that have embraced educational marketization to different degrees. Drawing on data from the Program for International Student Assessment and a causal-comparative design, we show that Australian schooling has more choice and competition, is more socially segregated, has larger school stratification of human and material resources, and has greater inequalities of educational outcomes and overall lower effectiveness than Canadian schooling. Our findings suggest that educational marketization reduces educational equity and effectiveness by increasing school social segregation and stratification of resources.","PeriodicalId":508754,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","volume":"58 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152241227810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While marketization has been promoted as a mechanism for improving educational equity and effectiveness, substantial evidence suggests that it may have the opposite effect. We contribute to this debate by examining educational equity and effectiveness in two similar countries that have embraced educational marketization to different degrees. Drawing on data from the Program for International Student Assessment and a causal-comparative design, we show that Australian schooling has more choice and competition, is more socially segregated, has larger school stratification of human and material resources, and has greater inequalities of educational outcomes and overall lower effectiveness than Canadian schooling. Our findings suggest that educational marketization reduces educational equity and effectiveness by increasing school social segregation and stratification of resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场化对学校隔离以及教育公平和有效性的影响:澳大利亚和加拿大的证据
虽然市场化一直被宣传为提高教育公平和效率的机制,但大量证据表明,它可能会产生相反的效果。我们通过研究两个在不同程度上接受了教育市场化的类似国家的教育公平和效率,为这一争论做出了贡献。我们利用国际学生评估项目(Program for International Student Assessment)的数据和因果比较设计,表明澳大利亚的学校教育比加拿大的学校教育有更多的选择和竞争,社会隔离程度更高,学校的人力和物力资源分层更大,教育结果的不平等程度更高,总体效率更低。我们的研究结果表明,教育市场化加剧了学校的社会隔离和资源分层,从而降低了教育的公平性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seeking asylum during a pandemic: A postcolonial media discourse analysis The urban logic of dispossession and nomadism in neoliberal Bangladesh A virtuous cycle? Migrant integration policies, attitudes toward immigration, and populist radical right voting in Europe Multiple scripts, multiple institutions: Introducing complexity into the understanding of women’s empowerment Introduction to the special issue of the International Journal of Comparative Sociology on “National identity, nationalism, patriotism, and globalization”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1