Morality is Non-Binary: Building a Pluralist Moral Sentence Embedding Space using Contrastive Learning

Findings Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2401.17228
Jeongwoo Park, Enrico Liscio, P. Murukannaiah
{"title":"Morality is Non-Binary: Building a Pluralist Moral Sentence Embedding Space using Contrastive Learning","authors":"Jeongwoo Park, Enrico Liscio, P. Murukannaiah","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2401.17228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in NLP show that language models retain a discernible level of knowledge in deontological ethics and moral norms. However, existing works often treat morality as binary, ranging from right to wrong. This simplistic view does not capture the nuances of moral judgment. Pluralist moral philosophers argue that human morality can be deconstructed into a finite number of elements, respecting individual differences in moral judgment. In line with this view, we build a pluralist moral sentence embedding space via a state-of-the-art contrastive learning approach. We systematically investigate the embedding space by studying the emergence of relationships among moral elements, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Our results show that a pluralist approach to morality can be captured in an embedding space. However, moral pluralism is challenging to deduce via self-supervision alone and requires a supervised approach with human labels.","PeriodicalId":508951,"journal":{"name":"Findings","volume":"39 1","pages":"654-673"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Findings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.17228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in NLP show that language models retain a discernible level of knowledge in deontological ethics and moral norms. However, existing works often treat morality as binary, ranging from right to wrong. This simplistic view does not capture the nuances of moral judgment. Pluralist moral philosophers argue that human morality can be deconstructed into a finite number of elements, respecting individual differences in moral judgment. In line with this view, we build a pluralist moral sentence embedding space via a state-of-the-art contrastive learning approach. We systematically investigate the embedding space by studying the emergence of relationships among moral elements, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Our results show that a pluralist approach to morality can be captured in an embedding space. However, moral pluralism is challenging to deduce via self-supervision alone and requires a supervised approach with human labels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道德是非二元的:利用对比学习构建多元道德句子嵌入空间
近来在 NLP 方面取得的进展表明,语言模型在 "义务论 "伦理学和道德规范方面保留了一定程度的知识。然而,现有的著作通常将道德视为二元对立,从对到错。这种简单化的观点无法捕捉道德判断的细微差别。多元主义道德哲学家认为,人类道德可以解构为有限的几个要素,尊重道德判断的个体差异。根据这一观点,我们通过最先进的对比学习方法构建了一个多元道德句子嵌入空间。我们通过定量和定性研究道德元素之间关系的出现,对嵌入空间进行了系统研究。我们的研究结果表明,道德多元化方法可以在嵌入空间中得到体现。然而,仅通过自我监督来推导道德多元化是具有挑战性的,需要使用带有人类标签的监督方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in Traffic Jams and Injuries Impact on Acceptability of Automated Vehicles: A Strong Curvilinear Relation with no signs of Loss Aversion. Day-of-Week, Month, and Seasonal Demand Variations: Comparing Flow Estimates Across New Travel Data Sources Human Mobility Patterns during the 2024 Total Solar Eclipse in Canada Substituting Car Trips: Does Intermodal Mobility Decrease External Costs and How Does It Affect Travel Times? An Analysis Based on GPS Tracking Data Revealed Preferences for Utilitarian Cycling Energy Expenditure versus Travel Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1