Russian Religious Reformation Process of Early 20th Century through Prism of Ideological Quests of Fr. Mikhail (Semenov)

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nauchnyi Dialog Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-275-296
D. A. Golovushkin
{"title":"Russian Religious Reformation Process of Early 20th Century through Prism of Ideological Quests of Fr. Mikhail (Semenov)","authors":"D. A. Golovushkin","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-275-296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the development of views on the reform of Russian Orthodoxy in the early 20th century by one of the prominent and unconventional religious thinkers of that time, Father Mikhail (Pavel Vasilievich Semenov, 1873-1916). It traces his journey from official Orthodoxy to the movement for religious renewal, and then to the Belokrinitskaya (or Austrian) Old Believer hierarchy, after which he becomes the main ideologist of “Golgotha Christianity” — a unique religious-reformist movement advocating for the revival of social and moral ideals of the early Christian community. As contemporaries noted, these “oscillations” of Father Mikhail (Semenov) became a natural expression of his intense quest for the kerygma of Christianity, capable of overturning the social ontology of the Orthodox Church — finding an Orthodox formula for individualizing faith and making the world the goal of salvation. The author concludes that the life path and ideological quests of Father Mikhail (Semenov) reflect an important regularity of the Russian reformation process. This regularity lies in the fact that the search for “foundations” of faith, theological foundations of doctrine, or religious foundations of culture and society is simultaneously associated with the actualization of a fundamentalist impulse in religion and to some extent with the modernization of the religious complex (this is a kind of religious swing: “fundamentalism — modernism,” “Old Believers — religious renewal,” etc.).","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-275-296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the development of views on the reform of Russian Orthodoxy in the early 20th century by one of the prominent and unconventional religious thinkers of that time, Father Mikhail (Pavel Vasilievich Semenov, 1873-1916). It traces his journey from official Orthodoxy to the movement for religious renewal, and then to the Belokrinitskaya (or Austrian) Old Believer hierarchy, after which he becomes the main ideologist of “Golgotha Christianity” — a unique religious-reformist movement advocating for the revival of social and moral ideals of the early Christian community. As contemporaries noted, these “oscillations” of Father Mikhail (Semenov) became a natural expression of his intense quest for the kerygma of Christianity, capable of overturning the social ontology of the Orthodox Church — finding an Orthodox formula for individualizing faith and making the world the goal of salvation. The author concludes that the life path and ideological quests of Father Mikhail (Semenov) reflect an important regularity of the Russian reformation process. This regularity lies in the fact that the search for “foundations” of faith, theological foundations of doctrine, or religious foundations of culture and society is simultaneously associated with the actualization of a fundamentalist impulse in religion and to some extent with the modernization of the religious complex (this is a kind of religious swing: “fundamentalism — modernism,” “Old Believers — religious renewal,” etc.).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从米哈伊尔(谢苗诺夫)神父的思想追求看 20 世纪初俄罗斯宗教改革进程
这篇文章探讨了当时杰出的非传统宗教思想家米哈伊尔神父(Pavel Vasilievich Semenov,1873-1916 年)对 20 世纪初俄罗斯东正教改革观点的发展。该书追溯了他从官方东正教到宗教复兴运动,再到 Belokrinitskaya(或奥地利)老信徒等级制度的历程,之后他成为了 "各各他基督教 "的主要思想家--这是一场独特的宗教改革运动,主张复兴早期基督教团体的社会和道德理想。正如同时代的人所指出的那样,米哈伊尔(谢苗诺夫)神父的这些 "摇摆 "是他对基督教圣谕的强烈追求的自然表现,这种追求能够颠覆东正教会的社会本体论--找到一种将信仰个人化并将世界作为救赎目标的东正教公式。作者的结论是,米哈伊尔(谢苗诺夫)神父的人生道路和思想追求反映了俄罗斯改革进程的一个重要规律性。这种规律性在于,对信仰的 "基础"、教义的神学基础或文化和社会的宗教基础的探索,同时与宗教中原教旨主义冲动的实现以及在某种程度上与宗教综合体的现代化联系在一起(这是一种宗教摇摆:"原教旨主义--现代主义"、"旧信徒--宗教革新 "等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nauchnyi Dialog
Nauchnyi Dialog HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
215
期刊最新文献
Development of Gold Mining Industry in Yakutia in 1920s Relations between Siberian and Kazakh Khanates in 15th-16th Centuries Features of Sheriff Court in Scotland in Early 19th Century (Exemplified by Selkirkshire County) Legal Historians of Russian Diaspora in 1920s—1930s Iran in South Caucasus: Foreign Policy Strategy and Regional Relations with Russia (1991—2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1