Echinochloa spp response to preemergence and postemergence herbicides in California rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Rohith Vulchi, Taiyu Guan, Troy Clark, Whitney Brim-DeForest
{"title":"Echinochloa spp response to preemergence and postemergence herbicides in California rice (Oryza sativa L.)","authors":"Rohith Vulchi, Taiyu Guan, Troy Clark, Whitney Brim-DeForest","doi":"10.3389/fagro.2024.1349008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, herbicides were used for Echinochloa spp control in California rice production which led to the selection of herbicide-resistant biotypes. Field surveys were conducted across the seven major rice-growing counties in 2020 and Echinochloa spp samples including barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.Beauv.), junglerice (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link), late watergrass (Echinochloa oryzicola (Vasinger) Vasinger) and coast cockspur (Echinochloa walteri (Pursh) Heller) were collected. Greenhouse experiments were carried out to determine their suspected resistance to common preemergence and postemergence rice herbicides used in California in Fall and Winter of 2021. A total of 62 and 63 samples were characterized for suspected resistance to four preemergence granular and three postemergence foliar-applied herbicides, respectively. When granular herbicides were evaluated, samples suspected of resistance in Winter were a subset of samples that were suspected of resistance in Fall. Results indicate >90% of Echinochloa spp samples were resistant to thiobencarb, benzobicyclon + halosulfuron and penoxsulam when combined across species and counties. Cross-resistance between benzobicyclon + halosulfuron and penoxsulam was observed in >90% of the samples when combined across species and counties. Suspected clomazone resistance was observed in <75% of the samples when combined across species and counties. Suspected resistance to cyhalofop and propanil was observed in <50% of the samples when averaged across both runs. Multiple-resistance to foliar herbicides ranged from 48-60% of the samples across species and experimental runs. These results indicate the necessity for rotating herbicides during alternate cropping seasons and emphasizing integrating non-chemical strategies for Echinochloa spp control in California rice production.","PeriodicalId":505893,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Agronomy","volume":"209 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2024.1349008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, herbicides were used for Echinochloa spp control in California rice production which led to the selection of herbicide-resistant biotypes. Field surveys were conducted across the seven major rice-growing counties in 2020 and Echinochloa spp samples including barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.Beauv.), junglerice (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link), late watergrass (Echinochloa oryzicola (Vasinger) Vasinger) and coast cockspur (Echinochloa walteri (Pursh) Heller) were collected. Greenhouse experiments were carried out to determine their suspected resistance to common preemergence and postemergence rice herbicides used in California in Fall and Winter of 2021. A total of 62 and 63 samples were characterized for suspected resistance to four preemergence granular and three postemergence foliar-applied herbicides, respectively. When granular herbicides were evaluated, samples suspected of resistance in Winter were a subset of samples that were suspected of resistance in Fall. Results indicate >90% of Echinochloa spp samples were resistant to thiobencarb, benzobicyclon + halosulfuron and penoxsulam when combined across species and counties. Cross-resistance between benzobicyclon + halosulfuron and penoxsulam was observed in >90% of the samples when combined across species and counties. Suspected clomazone resistance was observed in <75% of the samples when combined across species and counties. Suspected resistance to cyhalofop and propanil was observed in <50% of the samples when averaged across both runs. Multiple-resistance to foliar herbicides ranged from 48-60% of the samples across species and experimental runs. These results indicate the necessity for rotating herbicides during alternate cropping seasons and emphasizing integrating non-chemical strategies for Echinochloa spp control in California rice production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Echinochloa spp 对加州水稻(Oryza sativa L.)播前和播后除草剂的反应
加州水稻生产历来使用除草剂来控制稗草,这导致了抗除草剂生物型的出现。2020 年在七个主要水稻种植县进行了实地调查,并收集了稗草(Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.Beauv.)、稗草(Echinochloa colona (L.) Link)、晚熟禾(Echinochloa oryzicola (Vasinger) Vasinger)和海岸鸡冠花(Echinochloa walteri (Pursh) Heller)等稗草样本。进行了温室实验,以确定它们对 2021 年秋冬在加利福尼亚使用的常见水稻苗前和苗后除草剂的抗性。共有 62 和 63 个样本分别对四种芽前颗粒除草剂和三种芽后叶面喷施除草剂产生了疑似抗药性。在评估颗粒除草剂时,冬季疑似抗药性样本是秋季疑似抗药性样本的子集。结果表明,在不同的物种和县中,超过 90% 的越橘属样本对噻苯隆、苯并双环嘧啶+氟磺隆和五氟磺草胺具有抗药性。如果将不同物种和不同地区的样本合并计算,则有超过 90% 的样本对苯唑双环+氟磺隆和五氟磺草胺产生交叉抗性。在不同物种和县的样本中,发现小于 75% 的样本对克芜踪产生了疑似抗药性。如果对两次试验进行平均,则在小于 50% 的样本中观察到疑似对氰氟草酯和丙溴磷的抗药性。对叶面除草剂的多重抗药性在不同物种和实验运行的样本中占 48-60% 不等。这些结果表明,有必要在交替种植季节轮换使用除草剂,并强调在加利福尼亚水稻生产中采用非化学策略控制越橘属植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of integrated fertilizer and plant density management on yield, root characteristic and photosynthetic parameters in maize on the semiarid Loess Plateau Smart connected farms and networked farmers to improve crop production, sustainability and profitability Editorial: Methods in climate-smart agronomy Is Trichoderma ear rot on maize really a new dangerous plant disease? Enhancing crop yield and conserving soil moisture through mulching practices in dryland agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1