Modern doctors' view on the problem of diagnostics and treatment of asthenic syndrome in different regions of the Russian Federation

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Research Results in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.18413/rrpharmacology.10.398
Y. Belousova, A. M. Tynterova, V. Rafalskiy
{"title":"Modern doctors' view on the problem of diagnostics and treatment of asthenic syndrome in different regions of the Russian Federation","authors":"Y. Belousova, A. M. Tynterova, V. Rafalskiy","doi":"10.18413/rrpharmacology.10.398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The problem of asthenic disorders is determined by their high prevalence, the lack of diagnostic criteria and recommendations for therapy, and the absence of unified principles of coding in ICD-10. The aim of the study was to evaluate the current practice of neurologists and physicians of the Russian Federation (RF) in the diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of asthenic syndrome (AS).\nMaterials and Methods: An anonymous author-developed questionnaire survey of physicians on the issues of diagnostics and treatment of asthenia was conducted on the Google forms platform.\nResults: Total 238 specialists from 23 regions of the RF, 62.5% of neurologists and 37.5% of physicians, took part in the survey. Women suffer from AS more often than men. AS is most frequently verified at the age of 40-60 (65.5%) and under 40 (39.6%). Doctors use the codes G90.8 – other disorders of the autonomic nervous system – and I67.8 – other specified cerebral vascular lesions. The main causes of AS are affective disorders in 67.2% of patients and infectious diseases in 70% of patients. Almost 67% of doctors use anxiety and depression assessment scale, and only 13% of respondents use MFI-20 scale. The choice of therapy depended on the psychopathologic syndrome in 73.9% of cases. Most doctors favored nootropic drugs, metabolic action drugs, and B vitamins.\nConclusion: The current medical practice of diagnosing and treating AS was studied and informative data were obtained with regard to understanding the clinical-typological structure and nosological affiliation of AS. The results demonstrate the expediency of developing a unified algorithm for the management of patients with various manifestations of AS.","PeriodicalId":21030,"journal":{"name":"Research Results in Pharmacology","volume":"142 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Results in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18413/rrpharmacology.10.398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The problem of asthenic disorders is determined by their high prevalence, the lack of diagnostic criteria and recommendations for therapy, and the absence of unified principles of coding in ICD-10. The aim of the study was to evaluate the current practice of neurologists and physicians of the Russian Federation (RF) in the diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of asthenic syndrome (AS). Materials and Methods: An anonymous author-developed questionnaire survey of physicians on the issues of diagnostics and treatment of asthenia was conducted on the Google forms platform. Results: Total 238 specialists from 23 regions of the RF, 62.5% of neurologists and 37.5% of physicians, took part in the survey. Women suffer from AS more often than men. AS is most frequently verified at the age of 40-60 (65.5%) and under 40 (39.6%). Doctors use the codes G90.8 – other disorders of the autonomic nervous system – and I67.8 – other specified cerebral vascular lesions. The main causes of AS are affective disorders in 67.2% of patients and infectious diseases in 70% of patients. Almost 67% of doctors use anxiety and depression assessment scale, and only 13% of respondents use MFI-20 scale. The choice of therapy depended on the psychopathologic syndrome in 73.9% of cases. Most doctors favored nootropic drugs, metabolic action drugs, and B vitamins. Conclusion: The current medical practice of diagnosing and treating AS was studied and informative data were obtained with regard to understanding the clinical-typological structure and nosological affiliation of AS. The results demonstrate the expediency of developing a unified algorithm for the management of patients with various manifestations of AS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代医生对俄罗斯联邦不同地区衰弱综合征诊断和治疗问题的看法
导言:气喘病的问题在于其发病率高、缺乏诊断标准和治疗建议,以及 ICD-10 缺乏统一的编码原则。本研究的目的是评估俄罗斯联邦(RF)神经科医生和内科医生目前在气喘综合征(AS)诊断和药物治疗方面的实践情况:在谷歌表格平台上对医生进行了匿名问卷调查:来自俄罗斯联邦 23 个地区的 238 名专家参加了调查,其中 62.5%为神经科医生,37.5%为内科医生。女性比男性更易患强直性脊柱炎。强直性脊柱炎的高发年龄为 40-60 岁(65.5%)和 40 岁以下(39.6%)。医生使用的代码是 G90.8 - 其他自律神经系统疾病和 I67.8 - 其他特定脑血管病变。导致强直性脊柱炎的主要原因是情感障碍(占 67.2%)和感染性疾病(占 70%)。近 67% 的医生使用焦虑和抑郁评估量表,只有 13% 的受访者使用 MFI-20 量表。在 73.9% 的病例中,治疗方法的选择取决于精神病理综合征。大多数医生倾向于使用促智药物、代谢作用药物和 B 族维生素:对目前诊断和治疗强直性脊柱炎的医疗实践进行了研究,并获得了有关了解强直性脊柱炎的临床类型学结构和疾病分类的信息数据。研究结果表明,为治疗有各种表现的强直性脊柱炎患者制定统一的算法是很有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Results in Pharmacology
Research Results in Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Исследование влияния полипренолов пихты сибирской на обучаемость и память мышей с экспериментальной моделью болезни Альцгеймера Chemoproteomic analysis of the promising candidate molecule of the indole derivative with lab code SV-1010 and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs An effective way for targeting EGFR-mediated carcinogenesis: an in vitro study Protective effects of thymogen analogues, modified by D-alanine, in hydrazine liver damage Assessment of VEGF and TNF-alpha levels in patients with an unexpectedly poor and suboptimal response during the treatment of infertility using ART methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1