CRIMINAL LIABILITY AGAINST PERSONS OF AUTHENTIC DEED FORGERY (Study Decision Number: 1611/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Mks)

Devi Evany Aflinda, Sufirman Rahman, Hardianto Djanggih
{"title":"CRIMINAL LIABILITY AGAINST PERSONS OF AUTHENTIC DEED FORGERY (Study Decision Number: 1611/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Mks)","authors":"Devi Evany Aflinda, Sufirman Rahman, Hardianto Djanggih","doi":"10.52249/ilr.v4i1.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to (1) determine and analyze the forms of criminal responsibility and legal considerations of judges regarding the forgery of authentic deeds based on false statements in Makassar District Court Decision Number: 1611/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mks. (2) knowing and analyzing the legal consequences arising from authentic deeds that are based on false information. This research was conducted in Makassar, South Sulawesi Province, specifically at the Makassar District Court. This research was carried out by taking data from copies of decisions regarding the criminal act of ordering to place false information in authentic deeds. Apart from that, the author also conducted literature studies by reviewing books, literature and statutory regulations related to the problems. The result obtained is that the application of material law, in this case, is not appropriate because the element of the article being accused, namely Article 266 paragraph (1), which, in the author's opinion, is not appropriate the element of the use of the deed can cause harm, whereas the use of an authentic deed does not provide the damages alleged are selected by the Panel of Judges. Furthermore, the decision-making process carried out by the Panel of Judges, in the author's opinion, is not following the applicable legal rules because one of the elements in the article being charged is not following the facts in the trial. So, according to the author, imposing a crime on the defendant is inappropriate both in the Court of First Instance and the High Court.","PeriodicalId":500708,"journal":{"name":"IBLAM Law Review","volume":"277 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBLAM Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to (1) determine and analyze the forms of criminal responsibility and legal considerations of judges regarding the forgery of authentic deeds based on false statements in Makassar District Court Decision Number: 1611/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mks. (2) knowing and analyzing the legal consequences arising from authentic deeds that are based on false information. This research was conducted in Makassar, South Sulawesi Province, specifically at the Makassar District Court. This research was carried out by taking data from copies of decisions regarding the criminal act of ordering to place false information in authentic deeds. Apart from that, the author also conducted literature studies by reviewing books, literature and statutory regulations related to the problems. The result obtained is that the application of material law, in this case, is not appropriate because the element of the article being accused, namely Article 266 paragraph (1), which, in the author's opinion, is not appropriate the element of the use of the deed can cause harm, whereas the use of an authentic deed does not provide the damages alleged are selected by the Panel of Judges. Furthermore, the decision-making process carried out by the Panel of Judges, in the author's opinion, is not following the applicable legal rules because one of the elements in the article being charged is not following the facts in the trial. So, according to the author, imposing a crime on the defendant is inappropriate both in the Court of First Instance and the High Court.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伪造真实契约者的刑事责任 (研究决定编号:1611/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Mks)
本研究旨在:(1)确定并分析马卡萨地区法院第 1611/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mks 号判决中法官对基于虚假陈述伪造真实契约的刑事责任形式和法律考虑。(2) 了解并分析基于虚假信息的真实契约所产生的法律后果。本研究在南苏拉威西省的望加锡进行,特别是在望加锡地区法院。本研究通过从有关下令在真实契约中添加虚假信息的犯罪行为的判决副本中获取数据来进行。此外,作者还通过查阅与这些问题相关的书籍、文献和法律法规进行了文献研究。研究结果表明,在本案中适用物权法是不恰当的,因为被控条款的要件,即第 266 条第(1)款,在作者看来,使用契约会造成损害的要件是不恰当的,而使用真实契约并不能提供法官小组所选择的被指控的损害。此外,提交人认为,法官小组的决策过程没有遵循适用的法律规则,因为指控条款中的一个要素没有遵循审判中的事实。因此,提交人认为,在初审法院和高等法院对被告判罪都是不恰当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENEGAKAN SANKSI DISIPLIN BERAT TERHADAP PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL DI LINGKUNGAN KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindakan Pidana Illegal Loging Di Kawasan Hutan Indonesia HAK EKONOMI DALAM HAK CIPTA LAGU: ANALISIS KASUS KONTROVERSIAL ANTARA BAND DAN PARTAI POLITIK PEMBATASAN USIA TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DARI ANAK NARAPIDANA PEREMPUAN AUTHORITY OF NURSES TO INSTALL INFUSATIONS DURING THE PANDEMIC OUTSIDE OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1