Religious Dissociation and Liberal Separation: Inside a Christian Brotherhood and a Masonic Lodge

Graham Hill
{"title":"Religious Dissociation and Liberal Separation: Inside a Christian Brotherhood and a Masonic Lodge","authors":"Graham Hill","doi":"10.1017/s0003975623000577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent years have seen a flourishing of everyday experimentations with the category of religion: the “spiritual but not religious,” “religionless” Christians, and many more. Why is there such proliferation of popular experimentation with—and often distancing from—the category of religion? This article explores two such cases of experimentation, a religion-disavowing evangelical Christian brotherhood in Mexico and a Masonic lodge in Switzerland, and shows how, in these two cases, disavowing religion is in part a response to problems associated with a founding principle of liberalism, the separation of private conscience from public citizenship. Subjects of liberal separation are vulnerable to feelings of cloistered conscience and hollow citizenship, problems that are inherent to liberal separation, as evidenced by Freemasonry’s age-old experimentations. These problems are also, however, exacerbated by dwindling popular faith in the institutions of religion and liberal democracy, as evidenced by contemporary evangelical trends of which the Christian brotherhood is exemplary. Such experimentations can be distinguished between those that collapse conscience and citizenship and those that defend the separation while still looking for indirect connections. This contrast is also highlighted by the comparison of religion-disavowing evangelical Christians and Freemasonry.","PeriodicalId":508778,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sociology","volume":"57 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975623000577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have seen a flourishing of everyday experimentations with the category of religion: the “spiritual but not religious,” “religionless” Christians, and many more. Why is there such proliferation of popular experimentation with—and often distancing from—the category of religion? This article explores two such cases of experimentation, a religion-disavowing evangelical Christian brotherhood in Mexico and a Masonic lodge in Switzerland, and shows how, in these two cases, disavowing religion is in part a response to problems associated with a founding principle of liberalism, the separation of private conscience from public citizenship. Subjects of liberal separation are vulnerable to feelings of cloistered conscience and hollow citizenship, problems that are inherent to liberal separation, as evidenced by Freemasonry’s age-old experimentations. These problems are also, however, exacerbated by dwindling popular faith in the institutions of religion and liberal democracy, as evidenced by contemporary evangelical trends of which the Christian brotherhood is exemplary. Such experimentations can be distinguished between those that collapse conscience and citizenship and those that defend the separation while still looking for indirect connections. This contrast is also highlighted by the comparison of religion-disavowing evangelical Christians and Freemasonry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教分离与自由分离:基督教兄弟会和共济会小屋内幕
近年来,对宗教范畴的日常实验蓬勃发展:"有灵性但无宗教信仰"、"无宗教信仰 "的基督徒等等。为什么流行的宗教实验如此之多,而且往往与宗教保持距离?本文探讨了两个这样的实验案例--墨西哥的一个摒弃宗教的福音派基督教兄弟会和瑞士的一个共济会会所,并说明了在这两个案例中,摒弃宗教在某种程度上是对与自由主义创始原则相关问题的回应,即私人良知与公共公民身份的分离。自由主义分离的主体很容易产生隐匿的良知和空洞的公民意识,这些问题是自由主义分离所固有的,共济会的长期实验就是证明。然而,由于民众对宗教和自由民主制度的信心日益减少,这些问题也变得更加严重,基督教兄弟会就是其中的典范。这种实验可以区分为将良知与公民权相分离的实验和维护这种分离但仍在寻找间接联系的实验。将摒弃宗教的福音派基督徒与共济会进行比较也凸显了这种对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marked by a Criminal Record? Socioeconomic Differences in the Relationship Between Early Criminal Justice Contacts and Adult Life Outcomes Welfare Elites and State Reconfiguration Evidence from the Transformation of French Social Security Disenchanted With the Immigrant Dream: The Sociological Formation of Ex-Immigrant Subjectivity Leveraging uncertainty, market-power, and fiscal opacity: The growth of financial security states Bridging the gaping hole: central bank economists’ role in the rise of macro-finance post-crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1