Wittgenstein, Language, and the Trinity

Graham Floyd
{"title":"Wittgenstein, Language, and the Trinity","authors":"Graham Floyd","doi":"10.14428/thl.v8i1.74063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theistic religions differ in their conceptions of the nature of God. One philosophical-theological position, the Christian Trinity, stands out as unique amongst theistic religions. If such a position were demonstrated, it would significantly narrow the philosophical-theological gap in discussions of God’s nature. I proposed that such an argument in favor of the Christian Trinity can be found in Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language. It is argued that language is an essentially social phenomenon and that God is a language user requiring God to be an essentially social being. As a result, either polytheism or the Christian Trinity is true. I argue that this divine social nature is best explained by the Christian Trinity.","PeriodicalId":507361,"journal":{"name":"TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v8i1.74063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theistic religions differ in their conceptions of the nature of God. One philosophical-theological position, the Christian Trinity, stands out as unique amongst theistic religions. If such a position were demonstrated, it would significantly narrow the philosophical-theological gap in discussions of God’s nature. I proposed that such an argument in favor of the Christian Trinity can be found in Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language. It is argued that language is an essentially social phenomenon and that God is a language user requiring God to be an essentially social being. As a result, either polytheism or the Christian Trinity is true. I argue that this divine social nature is best explained by the Christian Trinity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维特根斯坦、语言与三位一体
有神论宗教对上帝本质的认识各不相同。在有神论宗教中,有一种哲学神学立场--基督教的三位一体--是独一无二的。如果能证明这种立场,就能大大缩小在讨论上帝本质时的哲学-神学差距。我建议从维特根斯坦的语言哲学中找到支持基督教三位一体论的论据。维特根斯坦认为,语言本质上是一种社会现象,而上帝是一种语言使用者,这就要求上帝本质上是一种社会存在。因此,无论是多神论还是基督教的三位一体论都是正确的。我认为,基督教的三位一体最能解释这种神圣的社会性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism The Love Argument for the Trinity Timelessness à la Leftow Defeating the Problem of Evil with Evil Defeating the Problem of Evil with Evil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1