When Law Is Silent: How to Compensate for the Harm to the Health or Property in the Absence of a Particular Harm-Doer?

A. Ryzhenkov, A. Anisimov
{"title":"When Law Is Silent: How to Compensate for the Harm to the Health or Property in the Absence of a Particular Harm-Doer?","authors":"A. Ryzhenkov, A. Anisimov","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Legal rules aimed at compensation for the harm caused by a particular state, individual, or legal entity (for example, oil pollution of the sea due to a tanker accident) are well studied and constantly used in scientific literature and international law practice. Meanwhile, every year, the number of cases of harm when the particular guilty party cannot be established grows; this is why it is almost impossible to compensate for the harm caused. Such cases include collisions of satellites causing space debris; the consequences of climate change for agriculture, forestry, and the health of citizens; and the pollution of the World Ocean with plastic debris, ballast water, and abandoned nets.\n There are more such cases at the national level. After studying acts of international environmental law, national legislation, and several examples from judicial practice, we show that compensation for the harm caused to life, health, or property in the absence of a particular harm-doer is difficult or impossible to prove. This is why actions that can prevent subjectless environmental harm are taken at the national level in certain countries by developing measures to mitigate and adapt to climate change, licensing space activities, and taking preventive measures against the formation of plastic debris and its pollution of the seas, etc. This trend should be continued, and the experience gained by certain states should be used in developing new acts of international environmental law. This will ensure the next step towards preventing environmental harm where it is impossible to establish the doer’s name.","PeriodicalId":503760,"journal":{"name":"German Law Journal","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal rules aimed at compensation for the harm caused by a particular state, individual, or legal entity (for example, oil pollution of the sea due to a tanker accident) are well studied and constantly used in scientific literature and international law practice. Meanwhile, every year, the number of cases of harm when the particular guilty party cannot be established grows; this is why it is almost impossible to compensate for the harm caused. Such cases include collisions of satellites causing space debris; the consequences of climate change for agriculture, forestry, and the health of citizens; and the pollution of the World Ocean with plastic debris, ballast water, and abandoned nets. There are more such cases at the national level. After studying acts of international environmental law, national legislation, and several examples from judicial practice, we show that compensation for the harm caused to life, health, or property in the absence of a particular harm-doer is difficult or impossible to prove. This is why actions that can prevent subjectless environmental harm are taken at the national level in certain countries by developing measures to mitigate and adapt to climate change, licensing space activities, and taking preventive measures against the formation of plastic debris and its pollution of the seas, etc. This trend should be continued, and the experience gained by certain states should be used in developing new acts of international environmental law. This will ensure the next step towards preventing environmental harm where it is impossible to establish the doer’s name.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当法律保持沉默时:在没有具体伤害者的情况下,如何补偿对健康或财产造成的伤害?
在科学文献和国际法实践中,旨在对特定国家、个人或法律实体造成的损害(例如,油轮事故造成的海洋石油污染)进行赔偿的法律规则得到了充分的研究和不断的应用。与此同时,无法确定具体责任方的损害案件数量每年都在增加,这就是为什么几乎不可能对所造成的损害进行赔偿。这些案例包括卫星碰撞造成的空间碎片;气候变化对农业、林业和公民健康造成的后果;以及塑料碎片、压舱水和废弃渔网对世界海洋造成的污染。在国家层面还有更多这样的案例。在研究了国际环境法、国家立法和司法实践中的一些案例后,我们发现,在没有特定损害者的情况下,对生命、健康或财产造成的损害进行赔偿是很难或不可能证明的。正因为如此,某些国家在国家层面上采取了能够防止无主体环境损害的行动,如制定减缓和适应气候变化的措施、为空间活动颁发许可证、采取预防措施防止塑料碎片的形成及其对海洋的污染等。应继续保持这一趋势,并在制定新的国际环境法时利用某些国家取得的经验。这将确保下一步在无法确定行为人姓名的情况下防止环境损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Odious Debt Doctrine: The Equitable Rule Crime and Sanctions: Beyond Sanctions as a Foreign Policy Tool – ERRATUM Trust and the Procedural Requirements of Article 7(2) TEU: When More than One Bad Apple Spoils the Barrel Trust and the Exchange of EU Classified Information: The Example of Absolute Originator Control Impeding Joint Parliamentary Scrutiny at Europol Balancing Interests: Criminal Proceedings & Private Life Interference Under Martial Law in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1