Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for ECG Signal Analysis and Arrhythmia Detection: A Review

Fatemeh Kazemi Lichaee, A. Salari, Jalil Jalili, Sedigheh Beikmohammad Dalivand, Mahdis Roshanfekr Rad, Mohadeseh Mojarad
{"title":"Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for ECG Signal Analysis and Arrhythmia Detection: A Review","authors":"Fatemeh Kazemi Lichaee, A. Salari, Jalil Jalili, Sedigheh Beikmohammad Dalivand, Mahdis Roshanfekr Rad, Mohadeseh Mojarad","doi":"10.5812/intjcardiovascpract-143437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: With the widespread availability of portable electrocardiogram (ECG) devices, there is an increasing interest in utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) methods for ECG signal analysis and arrhythmia detection. The potential benefits of AI-assisted arrhythmia prognosis, early screening, and improved accuracy in arrhythmia classification are discussed. Evidence Acquisition: Artificial intelligence methods are a new way to classify different types of arrhythmias. For example, deep learning (DL) algorithms, including long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, convolutional neural networks (CNN), CNN-based autoencoders (AE), and convolutional recurrent neural networks (CRNN), have been extensively utilized for ECG signal analysis and arrhythmia detection. Results: This study explores different DL techniques for classifying arrhythmias. The two-dimensional (2D) CNN model achieved an accuracy of 97.42% in classifying five different arrhythmias. After classifying five types of ECG signals, an accuracy of 99.53% was achieved by the CNN-based AE and transfer learning (TL) models. The CNN-Bi-LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 98.0% in categorizing five categories of ECG signals. The CNN+LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 98.24% in classifying five classes of arrhythmias. The CNN-support vector machine (SVM) classifier model demonstrated an accuracy of 98.64% in detecting seventeen classes of heartbeats. The results indicated that the CNN-based AE and TL models perform exceptionally well with high accuracy in detecting ECG signals. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the growing interest in utilizing DL for ECG signal detection in medical and healthcare applications over the past decade. Deep learning models have been shown to outperform experienced cardiologists, delivering state-of-the-art and more accurate results.","PeriodicalId":502770,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/intjcardiovascpract-143437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: With the widespread availability of portable electrocardiogram (ECG) devices, there is an increasing interest in utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) methods for ECG signal analysis and arrhythmia detection. The potential benefits of AI-assisted arrhythmia prognosis, early screening, and improved accuracy in arrhythmia classification are discussed. Evidence Acquisition: Artificial intelligence methods are a new way to classify different types of arrhythmias. For example, deep learning (DL) algorithms, including long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, convolutional neural networks (CNN), CNN-based autoencoders (AE), and convolutional recurrent neural networks (CRNN), have been extensively utilized for ECG signal analysis and arrhythmia detection. Results: This study explores different DL techniques for classifying arrhythmias. The two-dimensional (2D) CNN model achieved an accuracy of 97.42% in classifying five different arrhythmias. After classifying five types of ECG signals, an accuracy of 99.53% was achieved by the CNN-based AE and transfer learning (TL) models. The CNN-Bi-LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 98.0% in categorizing five categories of ECG signals. The CNN+LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 98.24% in classifying five classes of arrhythmias. The CNN-support vector machine (SVM) classifier model demonstrated an accuracy of 98.64% in detecting seventeen classes of heartbeats. The results indicated that the CNN-based AE and TL models perform exceptionally well with high accuracy in detecting ECG signals. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the growing interest in utilizing DL for ECG signal detection in medical and healthcare applications over the past decade. Deep learning models have been shown to outperform experienced cardiologists, delivering state-of-the-art and more accurate results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在心电信号分析和心律失常检测方面的进展:综述
背景:随着便携式心电图(ECG)设备的普及,人们对利用人工智能(AI)方法进行心电图信号分析和心律失常检测的兴趣与日俱增。本文讨论了人工智能辅助心律失常预后、早期筛查和提高心律失常分类准确性的潜在益处。证据获取:人工智能方法是对不同类型心律失常进行分类的一种新方法。例如,深度学习(DL)算法,包括长短期记忆(LSTM)网络、卷积神经网络(CNN)、基于 CNN 的自动编码器(AE)和卷积递归神经网络(CRNN),已被广泛用于心电信号分析和心律失常检测。结果本研究探讨了用于心律失常分类的不同 DL 技术。二维(2D)CNN 模型对五种不同心律失常的分类准确率达到 97.42%。在对五种心电信号进行分类后,基于 CNN 的 AE 和迁移学习(TL)模型的准确率达到了 99.53%。CNN-Bi-LSTM 模型对五类心电信号进行分类的准确率达到 98.0%。CNN+LSTM 模型对五类心律失常的分类准确率达到 98.24%。CNN 支持向量机(SVM)分类器模型在检测十七类心跳方面的准确率为 98.64%。结果表明,基于 CNN 的 AE 和 TL 模型在检测心电信号方面表现出色,准确率很高。结论本研究表明,过去十年来,在医疗和保健应用中利用深度学习检测心电信号的兴趣与日俱增。事实证明,深度学习模型优于经验丰富的心脏病专家,能提供最先进、更准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cardiac Arrhythmia in COVID-19 Patients Evaluating the Predictive Value of a Cardiac Perfusion Scan for Cardiac Events in Chronic Kidney Disease Increasing Respiratory Diseases in African Countries Require Attention from Concerned Agencies Increasing Respiratory Diseases in African Countries Require Attention from Concerned Agencies Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for ECG Signal Analysis and Arrhythmia Detection: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1