Psychometric Analysis of the Indian Version of the Patient Safety Culture Tool (I-HSOPSC 2.0) Validation

A. J., Pushpanjali K, Frank Federico, Lallu Joseph, U. Manjunath
{"title":"Psychometric Analysis of the Indian Version of the Patient Safety Culture Tool (I-HSOPSC 2.0) Validation","authors":"A. J., Pushpanjali K, Frank Federico, Lallu Joseph, U. Manjunath","doi":"10.1177/09720634231216564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient safety, which is both an overarching principle and a key factor in determining the quality of healthcare, continues to be a priority in healthcare systems on a global scale. A cross-sectional study in accredited Indian hospitals aimed to evaluate the HSOPSC V-2 (Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture). 1,603 healthcare professionals participated, assessing psychometric features using confirmatory factor analysis in SMART PLS 4. The average composite positive response rate was 64.8%. High positive responses (79%) were seen in ‘teamwork’, ‘communication about error’, and ‘hospital management support for patient safety’. However, ‘staffing and work pace’ (30%), ‘response to error’ (50%), ‘communication openness’, and ‘reporting patient safety events’ (both 59%) had lower positive responses, indicating room for improvement. Findings suggest I-HOSPSC 2.0’s content validity, reliability, and construct validity in measuring patient safety culture in Indian hospitals. It can aid administrators in assessing safety culture and improving patient safety and treatment efficacy. Notably, this is the inaugural HSOPSC V-2 validation research in the Indian healthcare context. Future research should explore the tool’s psychometric properties based on care setting levels due to substantial differences between public and private healthcare setups in India.","PeriodicalId":509705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634231216564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient safety, which is both an overarching principle and a key factor in determining the quality of healthcare, continues to be a priority in healthcare systems on a global scale. A cross-sectional study in accredited Indian hospitals aimed to evaluate the HSOPSC V-2 (Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture). 1,603 healthcare professionals participated, assessing psychometric features using confirmatory factor analysis in SMART PLS 4. The average composite positive response rate was 64.8%. High positive responses (79%) were seen in ‘teamwork’, ‘communication about error’, and ‘hospital management support for patient safety’. However, ‘staffing and work pace’ (30%), ‘response to error’ (50%), ‘communication openness’, and ‘reporting patient safety events’ (both 59%) had lower positive responses, indicating room for improvement. Findings suggest I-HOSPSC 2.0’s content validity, reliability, and construct validity in measuring patient safety culture in Indian hospitals. It can aid administrators in assessing safety culture and improving patient safety and treatment efficacy. Notably, this is the inaugural HSOPSC V-2 validation research in the Indian healthcare context. Future research should explore the tool’s psychometric properties based on care setting levels due to substantial differences between public and private healthcare setups in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度版患者安全文化工具(I-HSOPSC 2.0)验证的心理计量分析
患者安全既是一项总体原则,也是决定医疗质量的关键因素,在全球范围内一直是医疗系统的优先考虑事项。一项在获得认证的印度医院开展的横断面研究旨在评估 HSOPSC V-2(医院患者安全文化调查)。共有 1603 名医护专业人员参与,使用 SMART PLS 4 中的确证因子分析对心理测量特征进行了评估。团队合作"、"错误沟通 "和 "医院管理层对患者安全的支持 "的正面回答率较高(79%)。然而,"人员配备和工作节奏"(30%)、"对差错的反应"(50%)、"沟通的开放性 "和 "报告患者安全事件"(均为 59%)的正面回答率较低,表明还有改进的余地。研究结果表明,I-HOSPSC 2.0 在衡量印度医院患者安全文化方面具有内容有效性、可靠性和构建有效性。它可以帮助管理者评估安全文化,改善患者安全和治疗效果。值得注意的是,这是 HSOPSC V-2 在印度医疗环境中的首次验证研究。由于印度公立和私立医疗机构之间存在巨大差异,未来的研究应根据医疗机构的级别来探索该工具的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient Satisfaction: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Challenges for Cancer Patients Seeking Medical Care During COVID-19 Lockdown in India: A Narrative Review Socio-economic and Demographic Factors Influencing the Nutritional Status of Lactating Mothers in Delhi, India Using Crowdsourced Data to Assess the Impact 
of Shelter-in-Place Orders (SIPO) during COVID-19: Lessons from a Small Island 
Developing State Impact of Government Funded Health Insurance Scheme on OOP and Quality of Health Care: 
A Study of Maternal Health Care in Rajasthan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1