Comparison of the Vertical and Horizontal Components of the Ground Reaction Force of Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Individuals during Walking

Mostafa Payandeh, Hassan Daneshmandi
{"title":"Comparison of the Vertical and Horizontal Components of the Ground Reaction Force of Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Individuals during Walking","authors":"Mostafa Payandeh, Hassan Daneshmandi","doi":"10.18502/ssu.v31i11.14789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this research was to compare the vertical, medial-lateral and anterior-posterior components of ground reaction force after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the healthy individuals during walking. \nMethods: This was an analytic cross sectional research. The participants of this research included 46 football and volleyball athletes, who were divided into two groups of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and healthy individuals. A force plate was employed to evaluate the components of the ground reaction force while walking.The data were statistically analysed using independent t test and SPSS version 16 software. \nResults: The results related to the vertical component of ground reaction force showed that the participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction applied more force to the ground during heel strike and toe-off compared to healthy individuals, although the difference between the two groups was not significant (p=0.09 and p=0.35), but this difference was greater during heel strike. Likewise, the results related to the horizontal components of the ground reaction force showed that participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction applied more force to the ground in all horizontal components of the ground reaction force, but the biggest difference between the two groups was in the first 20% of the stance phase and in the posterior (p<0.007) and lateral (p<0.02) directions. This difference between the two groups was significant. \nConclusion: The results of the research showed that the most important difference between the two groups occurred in the first 20% of the stance phase. Although among the 6 measured components, only the posterior (p < 0.007) and medial (p < 0.02) ground force components were significant.","PeriodicalId":17084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ssu.v31i11.14789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this research was to compare the vertical, medial-lateral and anterior-posterior components of ground reaction force after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the healthy individuals during walking. Methods: This was an analytic cross sectional research. The participants of this research included 46 football and volleyball athletes, who were divided into two groups of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and healthy individuals. A force plate was employed to evaluate the components of the ground reaction force while walking.The data were statistically analysed using independent t test and SPSS version 16 software. Results: The results related to the vertical component of ground reaction force showed that the participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction applied more force to the ground during heel strike and toe-off compared to healthy individuals, although the difference between the two groups was not significant (p=0.09 and p=0.35), but this difference was greater during heel strike. Likewise, the results related to the horizontal components of the ground reaction force showed that participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction applied more force to the ground in all horizontal components of the ground reaction force, but the biggest difference between the two groups was in the first 20% of the stance phase and in the posterior (p<0.007) and lateral (p<0.02) directions. This difference between the two groups was significant. Conclusion: The results of the research showed that the most important difference between the two groups occurred in the first 20% of the stance phase. Although among the 6 measured components, only the posterior (p < 0.007) and medial (p < 0.02) ground force components were significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前十字韧带重建患者与健康人行走时地面反作用力的垂直和水平分量比较
导言本研究旨在比较前交叉韧带重建后与健康人行走时地面反作用力的垂直、内侧-外侧和前侧-后侧分量。研究方法这是一项横断面分析研究。研究对象包括 46 名足球和排球运动员,他们被分为前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后和健康人两组。数据采用独立 t 检验和 SPSS 16 版软件进行统计分析。结果与地面反作用力垂直分量有关的结果显示,与健康人相比,前交叉韧带重建的参与者在脚跟着地和脚尖离开时对地面施加了更大的力,尽管两组之间的差异并不显著(P=0.09 和 P=0.35),但在脚跟着地时这种差异更大。同样,与地面反作用力的水平分量有关的结果显示,前交叉韧带重建的参与者在地面反作用力的所有水平分量上都对地面施加了更大的力,但两组之间最大的差异出现在站立阶段的前20%,以及后方(p<0.007)和侧方(p<0.02)。两组之间的差异显著。结论研究结果表明,两组之间最重要的差异出现在站立阶段的前 20%。虽然在测量的 6 个分量中,只有后侧(p < 0.007)和内侧(p < 0.02)的地力分量具有显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Damages of Freezing on the Development of Oocyte and Embryos Parental Acceptance of Dental Treatment Options for Primary Teeth Comparative Evaluation of Severity of Periodontitis in Patients with and without Dyssomnias Serum Resistin Levels in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in an Iranian Population Evaluation of the Personality Characteristics of Cardiovascular Patients and People with a History of Drug abuse with the Control Group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1