A decade of Indonesian EFL students’ voices toward peer feedback practices during synchronous and asynchronous periods: A systematic literature review

Firda Rohmatul Aimah, Eko Suhartoyo
{"title":"A decade of Indonesian EFL students’ voices toward peer feedback practices during synchronous and asynchronous periods: A systematic literature review","authors":"Firda Rohmatul Aimah, Eko Suhartoyo","doi":"10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion regarding the utilization of peer feedback necessitates careful consideration, particularly within the university context. However, the impact of using peer feedback remains indeterminate. This study investigated Indonesian EFL students' perceptions of implementing peer feedback during synchronous and asynchronous periods. A systematic literature review (SLR) method was applied in this study. The data were gathered using the Lens database, evaluated using PRISMA, and coded based on the research questions. The data were separated into two parts over ten years: synchronous (2012-2018) and asynchronous (2019-2022). The findings indicated positive and negative comments. In terms of positive comments, students claimed they got a better understanding; however, in terms of negative comments, students mentioned that the feedback was questionable. The students implemented peer feedback via online and offline media. For online media, students use social media, such as Instagram, Facebook, and websites. In terms of offline media, students used papers. The students also implemented some types of peer feedback, such as support comments, knowledge sharing, negotiation, appreciation, and criticism. The current research limitations and suggestions underscore the need for broader investigations across diverse educational levels and geographical contexts, emphasizing the imperative to enhance the study's generalizability and validity.","PeriodicalId":31243,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discussion regarding the utilization of peer feedback necessitates careful consideration, particularly within the university context. However, the impact of using peer feedback remains indeterminate. This study investigated Indonesian EFL students' perceptions of implementing peer feedback during synchronous and asynchronous periods. A systematic literature review (SLR) method was applied in this study. The data were gathered using the Lens database, evaluated using PRISMA, and coded based on the research questions. The data were separated into two parts over ten years: synchronous (2012-2018) and asynchronous (2019-2022). The findings indicated positive and negative comments. In terms of positive comments, students claimed they got a better understanding; however, in terms of negative comments, students mentioned that the feedback was questionable. The students implemented peer feedback via online and offline media. For online media, students use social media, such as Instagram, Facebook, and websites. In terms of offline media, students used papers. The students also implemented some types of peer feedback, such as support comments, knowledge sharing, negotiation, appreciation, and criticism. The current research limitations and suggestions underscore the need for broader investigations across diverse educational levels and geographical contexts, emphasizing the imperative to enhance the study's generalizability and validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼英语学生在同步和异步学习期间对同伴反馈做法的十年心声:系统性文献综述
关于利用同伴反馈的讨论需要认真考虑,特别是在大学环境中。然而,使用同伴反馈的影响仍未确定。本研究调查了印度尼西亚 EFL 学生在同步和异步学习期间对实施同伴反馈的看法。本研究采用了系统文献综述(SLR)方法。使用 Lens 数据库收集数据,使用 PRISMA 进行评估,并根据研究问题进行编码。数据分为两部分,历时十年:同步(2012-2018 年)和异步(2019-2022 年)。研究结果显示了积极和消极的评论。在正面评价方面,学生们声称他们对知识有了更好的理解;但在负面评价方面,学生们提到反馈是有问题的。学生们通过在线和离线媒体实施同伴反馈。在网络媒体方面,学生们使用 Instagram、Facebook 和网站等社交媒体。在离线媒体方面,学生们使用了纸张。学生们还实施了一些类型的同伴反馈,如支持评论、知识共享、协商、赞赏和批评。当前研究的局限性和建议强调了在不同教育水平和地理背景下进行更广泛调查的必要性,强调了增强研究的普遍性和有效性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Indonesian EFL teachers’ attitudes toward the differentiated curriculum in junior high schools and factors contributing to their attitudes Uncovering EFL students’ frequent difficulties in academic writing and the coping strategies: The case of a college in Indonesia Exploring influential factors and strategies for addressing speech delay of a child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in English (L2) language acquisition A decade of Indonesian EFL students’ voices toward peer feedback practices during synchronous and asynchronous periods: A systematic literature review EFL students’ engagement in the post-pandemic teaching: Does technology matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1