Prosecutorial Power: Ending Prosecutions Through Restorative Justice Principles

Faisol Faisol, Yandri Radhi Anadi
{"title":"Prosecutorial Power: Ending Prosecutions Through Restorative Justice Principles","authors":"Faisol Faisol, Yandri Radhi Anadi","doi":"10.21070/ijins.v25i.1037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This data article delves into the evolving landscape of criminal law enforcement through the lens of prosecutors' authority to terminate prosecutions using restorative justice principles. Utilizing a normative research approach, it scrutinizes Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020 on Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice alongside statutory regulations Number 11 of 2021 and the concept of restorative justice itself. The study reveals that prosecutors indeed possess the power to end prosecutions when cases are resolved outside the courtroom, as evidenced by the issuance of the Decree on Termination of Prosecution (SKPP). This approach, rooted in article 35 paragraph (1) letters c and J of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Law, signifies a delegation of authority from the Attorney General to the Public Prosecutor. These findings emphasize the compatibility of restorative justice practices with the fundamental objectives of criminal law enforcement. \nHighlights: \n \nProsecutor's Authority: Prosecutors have the authority to discontinue prosecution based on restorative justice principles. \nOut-of-Court Settlement: SKPP is issued after out-of-court settlement of criminal cases through restorative justice mechanisms. \nLegal Basis: The legal basis for such action is the Indonesian Prosecutor Law Article 35 paragraph (1) letter c and J, which confirms the delegation of authority from the Attorney General to the Public Prosecutor. \n \nKeywords: Termination of Prosecution, Criminal, Restorative Justice","PeriodicalId":486475,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"112 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v25i.1037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This data article delves into the evolving landscape of criminal law enforcement through the lens of prosecutors' authority to terminate prosecutions using restorative justice principles. Utilizing a normative research approach, it scrutinizes Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020 on Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice alongside statutory regulations Number 11 of 2021 and the concept of restorative justice itself. The study reveals that prosecutors indeed possess the power to end prosecutions when cases are resolved outside the courtroom, as evidenced by the issuance of the Decree on Termination of Prosecution (SKPP). This approach, rooted in article 35 paragraph (1) letters c and J of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Law, signifies a delegation of authority from the Attorney General to the Public Prosecutor. These findings emphasize the compatibility of restorative justice practices with the fundamental objectives of criminal law enforcement. Highlights: Prosecutor's Authority: Prosecutors have the authority to discontinue prosecution based on restorative justice principles. Out-of-Court Settlement: SKPP is issued after out-of-court settlement of criminal cases through restorative justice mechanisms. Legal Basis: The legal basis for such action is the Indonesian Prosecutor Law Article 35 paragraph (1) letter c and J, which confirms the delegation of authority from the Attorney General to the Public Prosecutor. Keywords: Termination of Prosecution, Criminal, Restorative Justice
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检察权:通过恢复性司法原则终止起诉
这篇数据文章通过检察官利用恢复性司法原则终止起诉的权力这一视角,深入探讨了不断变化的刑事执法情况。文章采用规范研究方法,仔细研究了 2020 年第 15 号总检察长条例《基于恢复性司法终止起诉》、2021 年第 11 号法定条例以及恢复性司法概念本身。研究表明,当案件在法庭外解决时,检察官确实拥有终止起诉的权力,《终止起诉法令》(SKPP)的颁布就是证明。这种做法植根于《印度尼西亚共和国检察官法》第 35 条第(1)款 c 和 J 项,意味着总检察长将权力下放给检察官。这些发现强调了恢复性司法实践与刑事执法基本目标的一致性。亮点: 检察官的权力:检察官有权根据恢复性司法原则中止起诉。庭外和解:通过恢复性司法机制对刑事案件进行庭外和解后,签发《犯罪现场保护方案》。法律依据:此类行动的法律依据是《印度尼西亚检察官法》第35条第(1)款c项和J项,其中确认了总检察长对检察官的授权。 关键词终止起诉、刑事、恢复性司法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovative Legal Approaches for Contemporary Challenges in Indonesia Luth Badila's Learning Time Multi-Factor Evaluation of RHL Success in Neniari Village, Indonesia Automated Rain-Sensing Window Closure Redefines Home Comfort Exploring Historical Traditions in Spatial Planning for Multi-Family Residential Buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1