Multi-Factor Evaluation of RHL Success in Neniari Village, Indonesia

Elvira Lumapuy, Jhon. M. Matinahoru, F. latumahina
{"title":"Multi-Factor Evaluation of RHL Success in Neniari Village, Indonesia","authors":"Elvira Lumapuy, Jhon. M. Matinahoru, F. latumahina","doi":"10.21070/ijins.v25i3.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"General Background: Forest and land rehabilitation (RHL) is essential for addressing critical land conditions, aiming to transform unproductive lands into areas that can enhance community living standards through increased productivity. Specific Background: In Neniari Village, the RHL program has been implemented with mixed success, utilizing agroforestry systems and involving various species, including both timber and non-timber plants. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies often lack detailed analysis of the factors influencing RHL success at a community and ecological level. Aims: This study seeks to evaluate the overall success of the RHL program in Neniari Village by considering plant survival rates, environmental factors, and community participation. Results: The survival rate of plants averaged 70%, indicating a moderate level of rehabilitation success, which did not meet the targeted benchmarks. Novelty: This research uniquely combines biotic and abiotic factor analyses with community engagement levels to assess RHL outcomes. Implications: The findings highlight the need for enhanced community involvement and improved environmental condition management to boost RHL success rates, suggesting adjustments to future rehabilitation strategies.Highlights: \n \nCommunity Involvement: Higher levels of community participation are directly linked to the success of rehabilitation efforts, indicating the need for more focused engagement strategies. \nPlant Survival: An average survival rate of 70% among various plant species underlines the challenges of RHL in achieving its goals, pointing towards the necessity for improved environmental management. \nAgroforestry Benefits: Utilizing agroforestry systems has shown potential benefits in enhancing ecological diversity and economic returns, suggesting its suitability for RHL practices. \n \n \n \n \n \nKeywords: Forest Rehabilitation, Community Participation, Agroforestry Systems, Plant Survival Rates, Environmental Factors \n \n \n \n \n ","PeriodicalId":486475,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"45 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v25i3.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

General Background: Forest and land rehabilitation (RHL) is essential for addressing critical land conditions, aiming to transform unproductive lands into areas that can enhance community living standards through increased productivity. Specific Background: In Neniari Village, the RHL program has been implemented with mixed success, utilizing agroforestry systems and involving various species, including both timber and non-timber plants. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies often lack detailed analysis of the factors influencing RHL success at a community and ecological level. Aims: This study seeks to evaluate the overall success of the RHL program in Neniari Village by considering plant survival rates, environmental factors, and community participation. Results: The survival rate of plants averaged 70%, indicating a moderate level of rehabilitation success, which did not meet the targeted benchmarks. Novelty: This research uniquely combines biotic and abiotic factor analyses with community engagement levels to assess RHL outcomes. Implications: The findings highlight the need for enhanced community involvement and improved environmental condition management to boost RHL success rates, suggesting adjustments to future rehabilitation strategies.Highlights: Community Involvement: Higher levels of community participation are directly linked to the success of rehabilitation efforts, indicating the need for more focused engagement strategies. Plant Survival: An average survival rate of 70% among various plant species underlines the challenges of RHL in achieving its goals, pointing towards the necessity for improved environmental management. Agroforestry Benefits: Utilizing agroforestry systems has shown potential benefits in enhancing ecological diversity and economic returns, suggesting its suitability for RHL practices. Keywords: Forest Rehabilitation, Community Participation, Agroforestry Systems, Plant Survival Rates, Environmental Factors  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚 Neniari 村 RHL 成功的多因素评估
一般背景:森林和土地恢复(RHL)对于解决关键的土地状况至关重要,其目的是将非生产性土地转变为可通过提高生产力来提高社区生活水平的地区。具体背景:在 Neniari 村,森林和土地恢复计划利用农林系统实施,涉及多种物种,包括木材和非木材植物,取得了不同程度的成功。知识差距:现有研究往往缺乏对社区和生态层面影响 RHL 成功的因素的详细分析。目的:本研究旨在通过考虑植物存活率、环境因素和社区参与度,评估涅尼亚里村 RHL 计划的总体成功情况。研究结果植物存活率平均为 70%,表明恢复工作取得了中等程度的成功,但未达到目标基准。新颖性: 该研究独特地将生物和非生物因素分析与社区参与水平相结合,以评估 RHL 的成果。影响:研究结果强调了加强社区参与和改善环境条件管理以提高 RHL 成功率的必要性,并建议对未来的恢复策略进行调整: 社区参与:更高水平的社区参与与恢复工作的成功直接相关,这表明需要制定更有针对性的参与策略。植物存活率:各种植物物种的平均存活率为 70%,这凸显了恢复与健康工作在实现其目标方面所面临的挑战,表明有必要改进环境管理。农林业效益:利用农林业系统在提高生态多样性和经济收益方面显示出潜在的好处,这表明农林业系统适用于 RHL 实践。 关键词森林恢复 社区参与 农林系统 植物存活率 环境因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovative Legal Approaches for Contemporary Challenges in Indonesia Luth Badila's Learning Time Multi-Factor Evaluation of RHL Success in Neniari Village, Indonesia Automated Rain-Sensing Window Closure Redefines Home Comfort Exploring Historical Traditions in Spatial Planning for Multi-Family Residential Buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1