A Performance Evaluation of Repetitive and Iterative Learning Algorithms for Periodic Tracking Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation System

E. Kurniawan, Enggar B. Pratiwi, H. Adinanta, Suryadi Suryadi, J. Prakosa, Purwowibowo Purwowibowo, S. Wijonarko, T. Maftukhah, D. Rustandi, Mahmudi Mahmudi
{"title":"A Performance Evaluation of Repetitive and Iterative Learning Algorithms for Periodic Tracking Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation System","authors":"E. Kurniawan, Enggar B. Pratiwi, H. Adinanta, Suryadi Suryadi, J. Prakosa, Purwowibowo Purwowibowo, S. Wijonarko, T. Maftukhah, D. Rustandi, Mahmudi Mahmudi","doi":"10.18196/jrc.v5i1.20705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a medical device that delivers electrical pulses to the muscle, allowing patients with spinal cord injuries to perform activities such as walking, cycling, and grasping. It is critical for the FES to generate stimuli with the appropriate controller so that the desired movements can be precisely tracked. By considering the repetitive nature of the movements, the learning-based control algorithms are utilized for regulating the FES. Iterative learning control (ILC) and repetitive control (RC) are two learning algorithms that can be used to accomplish accurate repetitive motions. This study investigates a variety of ILC and RC designs with distinct learning functions; this constitutes our contribution to the field. The FES model of ankle angle, which is in a class of discrete-time linear systems is considered in this study. Two learning functions, i.e., proportional, and zero-phase learning functions, are simulated for the second-order FES model running at a sampling time of 0.1 s. The results indicate the superior performance of the ILC and RC in terms of convergence rate using the zero-phase learning function. ILC and RC with a zero-phase learning function can reach a zero root-mean-square error in two iterations if the model of the plant is correct. This is faster than proportional-based ILC and RC, which takes about 40 iterations. This indicates that the zero-phase learning function requires two iterations to ensure that the patient's ankle angle precisely tracks the intended trajectory. However, the tracking performance is degraded for both control methods, especially when the model is subject to uncertainties. This specific problem can lead to future research directions.","PeriodicalId":443428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC)","volume":"30 9-10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v5i1.20705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a medical device that delivers electrical pulses to the muscle, allowing patients with spinal cord injuries to perform activities such as walking, cycling, and grasping. It is critical for the FES to generate stimuli with the appropriate controller so that the desired movements can be precisely tracked. By considering the repetitive nature of the movements, the learning-based control algorithms are utilized for regulating the FES. Iterative learning control (ILC) and repetitive control (RC) are two learning algorithms that can be used to accomplish accurate repetitive motions. This study investigates a variety of ILC and RC designs with distinct learning functions; this constitutes our contribution to the field. The FES model of ankle angle, which is in a class of discrete-time linear systems is considered in this study. Two learning functions, i.e., proportional, and zero-phase learning functions, are simulated for the second-order FES model running at a sampling time of 0.1 s. The results indicate the superior performance of the ILC and RC in terms of convergence rate using the zero-phase learning function. ILC and RC with a zero-phase learning function can reach a zero root-mean-square error in two iterations if the model of the plant is correct. This is faster than proportional-based ILC and RC, which takes about 40 iterations. This indicates that the zero-phase learning function requires two iterations to ensure that the patient's ankle angle precisely tracks the intended trajectory. However, the tracking performance is degraded for both control methods, especially when the model is subject to uncertainties. This specific problem can lead to future research directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于功能性电刺激系统周期性跟踪控制的重复学习算法和迭代学习算法的性能评估
功能性电刺激(FES)是一种向肌肉输送电脉冲的医疗设备,可让脊髓损伤患者进行行走、骑自行车和抓握等活动。对于 FES 而言,关键是要用适当的控制器产生刺激,以便精确跟踪所需的动作。考虑到运动的重复性,基于学习的控制算法可用于调节 FES。迭代学习控制(ILC)和重复控制(RC)是两种可用于完成精确重复运动的学习算法。本研究调查了各种具有不同学习功能的 ILC 和 RC 设计,这也是我们对该领域的贡献。本研究考虑了属于离散时间线性系统的踝关节角度 FES 模型。结果表明,使用零相学习函数的 ILC 和 RC 在收敛速度方面表现出色。如果电厂模型正确,使用零相学习函数的 ILC 和 RC 可以在两次迭代中达到均方根误差为零。这比基于比例的 ILC 和 RC 要快,后者大约需要 40 次迭代。这表明,零相学习功能需要两次迭代才能确保患者的踝关节角度精确跟踪预定轨迹。然而,这两种控制方法的跟踪性能都会下降,尤其是当模型存在不确定性时。这一具体问题可为今后的研究指明方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient Path Planning Algorithm for Mobile Robots Performing Floor Cleaning Like Operations Adaptive Cruise Control of the Autonomous Vehicle Based on Sliding Mode Controller Using Arduino and Ultrasonic Sensor Development of Microclimate Data Recorder on Coffee-Pine Agroforestry Using LoRaWAN and IoT Technology Using Learning Focal Point Algorithm to Classify Emotional Intelligence Enhanced Trajectory Tracking of 3D Overhead Crane Using Adaptive Sliding-Mode Control and Particle Swarm Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1