Isolated greater trochanter fractures of the native hip: Is magnetic resonance imaging needed?

Kevin Heo, Jason A Shah, Nick Cantu, John M. Kopriva, Henry M Gass, Alexander R. Webb, Amoolya Vayalapalli, Thomas J Moore
{"title":"Isolated greater trochanter fractures of the native hip: Is magnetic resonance imaging needed?","authors":"Kevin Heo, Jason A Shah, Nick Cantu, John M. Kopriva, Henry M Gass, Alexander R. Webb, Amoolya Vayalapalli, Thomas J Moore","doi":"10.1177/22104917231208209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Isolated greater trochanter fractures represent a subset of hip fractures for which diagnostic work-up and treatment algorithms can vary. Magnetic resonance imaging has been described as the definitive method of evaluating fracture extension into the intertrochanteric region. While prophylactic fixation for those with fracture extension may prevent the propagation of the injury, treatment debates remain. This study aimed to assess adherence to protocols at our institution and evaluate outcomes in those whose care deviated from protocol. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, adult patients (≥18 years old) presenting with a greater trochanter fracture over a 7-year period (2015–2021) were identified. Patients were excluded if the injury was periprosthetic, had a ballistic mechanism, or had any concomitant fractures of the femoral head, neck, or shaft identified on plain radiographs. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment, and outcomes were tabulated via chart review. Results: In total, 57 isolated greater trochanter fracture patients were included. Of these, 52 patients (91%) had computed tomographic scans, yet only 41 patients (72%) had magnetic resonance imaging completed. In total, 10 of the 41 (24%) patients with magnetic resonance imaging showed <50% fracture line extension, and all of these patients were treated nonoperatively. In contrast, 24 of 41 magnetic resonance imaging patients (59%) showed >50% fracture line extension in both coronal and axial planes, of which 14 (58%) were treated operatively. However, the 10 nonoperative patients with significant fracture extension showed no increased hospital length-of-stay or fracture extension upon follow-up. Conclusions: Our study showed that institutional protocol for diagnostic workup and treatment evaluation for isolated greater trochanter fractures is not consistently followed. However, patients who deviated from treatment protocol showed no elevated risks of fracture propagation. Our study questions the need for magnetic resonance imaging in all isolated greater trochanter fractures, and suggests that protocols be revisited to ensure that workup is optimal for patients and costeffective for the healthcare system itself.","PeriodicalId":517288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231208209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Isolated greater trochanter fractures represent a subset of hip fractures for which diagnostic work-up and treatment algorithms can vary. Magnetic resonance imaging has been described as the definitive method of evaluating fracture extension into the intertrochanteric region. While prophylactic fixation for those with fracture extension may prevent the propagation of the injury, treatment debates remain. This study aimed to assess adherence to protocols at our institution and evaluate outcomes in those whose care deviated from protocol. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, adult patients (≥18 years old) presenting with a greater trochanter fracture over a 7-year period (2015–2021) were identified. Patients were excluded if the injury was periprosthetic, had a ballistic mechanism, or had any concomitant fractures of the femoral head, neck, or shaft identified on plain radiographs. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment, and outcomes were tabulated via chart review. Results: In total, 57 isolated greater trochanter fracture patients were included. Of these, 52 patients (91%) had computed tomographic scans, yet only 41 patients (72%) had magnetic resonance imaging completed. In total, 10 of the 41 (24%) patients with magnetic resonance imaging showed <50% fracture line extension, and all of these patients were treated nonoperatively. In contrast, 24 of 41 magnetic resonance imaging patients (59%) showed >50% fracture line extension in both coronal and axial planes, of which 14 (58%) were treated operatively. However, the 10 nonoperative patients with significant fracture extension showed no increased hospital length-of-stay or fracture extension upon follow-up. Conclusions: Our study showed that institutional protocol for diagnostic workup and treatment evaluation for isolated greater trochanter fractures is not consistently followed. However, patients who deviated from treatment protocol showed no elevated risks of fracture propagation. Our study questions the need for magnetic resonance imaging in all isolated greater trochanter fractures, and suggests that protocols be revisited to ensure that workup is optimal for patients and costeffective for the healthcare system itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性髋关节大转子孤立性骨折:是否需要磁共振成像?
背景:孤立的大转子骨折是髋部骨折的一个分支,其诊断工作和治疗方法各不相同。磁共振成像被认为是评估骨折延伸至转子间区域的明确方法。虽然对骨折扩展者进行预防性固定可防止损伤扩散,但治疗方面仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估本院对治疗方案的遵守情况,并对偏离治疗方案者的治疗效果进行评估。方法:在一项回顾性分析中,确定了7年间(2015-2021年)出现大转子骨折的成年患者(≥18岁)。如果患者的损伤是假体周围损伤、弹道机制损伤,或在平片上发现股骨头、股骨颈或股骨柄合并骨折,则排除在外。患者的人口统计学特征、并发症、治疗和结果均通过病历审查制成表格。结果:共纳入 57 例孤立性大转子骨骨折患者。其中,52 名患者(91%)进行了计算机断层扫描,但只有 41 名患者(72%)完成了磁共振成像。在 41 例(24%)磁共振成像患者中,共有 10 例(24%)在冠状面和轴面上均显示骨折线延伸 50%,其中 14 例(58%)接受了手术治疗。不过,10 名骨折明显延长的非手术患者在随访时并未显示住院时间延长或骨折延长。结论:我们的研究表明,机构对孤立性大转子骨折的诊断和治疗评估方案并未得到一致遵循。不过,偏离治疗方案的患者骨折扩展的风险并没有增加。我们的研究质疑了对所有孤立性大转子骨折进行磁共振成像检查的必要性,并建议重新审视治疗方案,以确保为患者提供最佳治疗,并为医疗系统本身节约成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retrospective evaluation of the short-term effectiveness of non-enzymatically isolated stromal vascular fraction cells in patients with knee osteoarthritis Comparison of Kleinert versus Saint John protocol in Zone I/II flexor tendon injuries: A retrospective study Factors affecting decreased walking ability in patients with conservatively treated fragility fracture of the pelvic ring Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia by orthopaedic surgeons in fixation of distal radius fracture Comparative outcome of different treatment options for acetabulum fractures in elderly individuals—a retrospective analysis of 207 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1