Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia by orthopaedic surgeons in fixation of distal radius fracture

Chun Lok Chow, Y. Siu, C. Ma, T. Lui
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia by orthopaedic surgeons in fixation of distal radius fracture","authors":"Chun Lok Chow, Y. Siu, C. Ma, T. Lui","doi":"10.1177/22104917241232087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The technique of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has demonstrated satisfactory efficacy and safety in fixation of various fractures. There are limited studies performed concerning the applicability of a surgeon self-performed ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a self-performed ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia by surgeon for distal radius fracture fixation in terms of intraoperative and post-operative characteristics. Material and Methods: Patients with distal radius fracture who underwent surgery under the surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia were evaluated in this retrospective study. A total of 12 patients (2 male/10 female) with a mean age of 60.6 were evaluated for the type of injury by AO classification, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA), intraoperative visual analog scale pain (VAS) scores, duration of operation, post-operative pain control, complications and duration of hospitalisation. Result: Average age of the study population was 60.6, of which four of them were of ASA I, six of them ASA II and two of them ASA III. We provided complete pain control during the operation with all of the patient experience no pain (VAS  =  0) throughout the operation. Average operative time was 77.5 min. Average blood loss was 7.7 mL. Early post-operative pain control at 6 h after operation was well with majority of patients experience pain of VAS 1. Average post-operative hospital length of stay is 2.08 days. There was no complication arising from the application of regional anesthesia. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia can provide excellent efficacy and pain control during and after operation. Occurrence of complication was well avoided. Distal radius fracture fixation can be performed safely by orthopaedic surgeons under this technique.","PeriodicalId":517288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":" 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917241232087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The technique of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has demonstrated satisfactory efficacy and safety in fixation of various fractures. There are limited studies performed concerning the applicability of a surgeon self-performed ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a self-performed ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia by surgeon for distal radius fracture fixation in terms of intraoperative and post-operative characteristics. Material and Methods: Patients with distal radius fracture who underwent surgery under the surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia were evaluated in this retrospective study. A total of 12 patients (2 male/10 female) with a mean age of 60.6 were evaluated for the type of injury by AO classification, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA), intraoperative visual analog scale pain (VAS) scores, duration of operation, post-operative pain control, complications and duration of hospitalisation. Result: Average age of the study population was 60.6, of which four of them were of ASA I, six of them ASA II and two of them ASA III. We provided complete pain control during the operation with all of the patient experience no pain (VAS  =  0) throughout the operation. Average operative time was 77.5 min. Average blood loss was 7.7 mL. Early post-operative pain control at 6 h after operation was well with majority of patients experience pain of VAS 1. Average post-operative hospital length of stay is 2.08 days. There was no complication arising from the application of regional anesthesia. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia can provide excellent efficacy and pain control during and after operation. Occurrence of complication was well avoided. Distal radius fracture fixation can be performed safely by orthopaedic surgeons under this technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨科医生在超声引导下进行桡骨远端骨折固定的区域麻醉
超声引导下区域麻醉技术在各种骨折的固定中表现出令人满意的疗效和安全性。关于外科医生自行实施超声引导下区域麻醉的适用性研究有限。本研究旨在从术中和术后特征方面评估外科医生自行实施超声引导区域麻醉用于桡骨远端骨折固定术的疗效。材料与方法:这项回顾性研究评估了在外科医生超声引导下进行区域麻醉的桡骨远端骨折患者。共对 12 名患者(2 男/10 女)(平均年龄 60.6 岁)进行了评估,评估内容包括 AO 分类、美国麻醉医师协会分类(ASA)、术中视觉模拟评分疼痛(VAS)评分、手术时间、术后疼痛控制、并发症和住院时间。研究结果研究对象的平均年龄为 60.6 岁,其中 4 人为 ASA I 级,6 人为 ASA II 级,2 人为 ASA III 级。我们在手术过程中完全控制了疼痛,所有患者在整个手术过程中均无疼痛感(VAS = 0)。平均手术时间为 77.5 分钟。平均失血量为 7.7 毫升。术后 6 小时的早期疼痛控制良好,大多数患者的疼痛程度为 VAS 1。术后平均住院时间为 2.08 天。应用区域麻醉时未出现并发症。结论超声引导下区域麻醉可在手术过程中和手术后提供出色的疗效和疼痛控制。很好地避免了并发症的发生。骨科外科医生可以使用这种技术安全地进行桡骨远端骨折固定术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retrospective evaluation of the short-term effectiveness of non-enzymatically isolated stromal vascular fraction cells in patients with knee osteoarthritis Comparison of Kleinert versus Saint John protocol in Zone I/II flexor tendon injuries: A retrospective study Factors affecting decreased walking ability in patients with conservatively treated fragility fracture of the pelvic ring Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia by orthopaedic surgeons in fixation of distal radius fracture Comparative outcome of different treatment options for acetabulum fractures in elderly individuals—a retrospective analysis of 207 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1