{"title":"Health impact pathways related to air quality changes: testing two health risk methodologies over a local traffic case study","authors":"Carlos Silveira, Joana Ferreira, Ana I. Miranda","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01504-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Air pollution causes damage and imposes risks on human health, especially in cities, where the pollutant load is a major concern, although the extent of these effects is still largely unknown. Thus, taking the busiest road traffic area in Portugal as a local case study (600 m × 600 m domain, 4 m<sup>2</sup> spatial resolution), the objective of this work was to investigate two health risk methodologies (linear and nonlinear), which were applied for estimating short-term health impacts related to daily variations of high-resolution ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations modelled for winter and summer periods. Both approaches are based on the same general equation and health input metrics, differing only in the relative risk calculation. Health outcomes, translated into the total number of cases and subsequent damage costs, were compared, and their associated uncertainties and challenges for health impact modelling were addressed. Overall, for the winter and summer periods, health outcomes considering the whole simulation domain were lower using the nonlinear methodology (less 27% and 28%, respectively). Spatially, these differences are more noticeable in locations with higher NO<sub>2</sub> and population values, where the highest health estimates were obtained. When the daily NO<sub>2</sub> exposure was less than 6 µg.m<sup>−3</sup>, a fact that occurred in 95% of the domain cells and in both periods, relatively small differences between approaches were found. Analysing the seasonality effect, total health impacts derived from the linear and nonlinear applications were greater in summer (around 18% in both approaches). This happens due to the magnitude and spatial variability of NO<sub>2</sub>, as the other health input metrics remained constant. This exploratory research in local scale health impact assessment (HIA) demonstrated that the use of refined input data could contribute to more accurate health estimates and that the nonlinear approach is probably the most suitable for characterising air pollution episodes, thus providing important support in HIA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 5","pages":"1077 - 1089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01504-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Air pollution causes damage and imposes risks on human health, especially in cities, where the pollutant load is a major concern, although the extent of these effects is still largely unknown. Thus, taking the busiest road traffic area in Portugal as a local case study (600 m × 600 m domain, 4 m2 spatial resolution), the objective of this work was to investigate two health risk methodologies (linear and nonlinear), which were applied for estimating short-term health impacts related to daily variations of high-resolution ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations modelled for winter and summer periods. Both approaches are based on the same general equation and health input metrics, differing only in the relative risk calculation. Health outcomes, translated into the total number of cases and subsequent damage costs, were compared, and their associated uncertainties and challenges for health impact modelling were addressed. Overall, for the winter and summer periods, health outcomes considering the whole simulation domain were lower using the nonlinear methodology (less 27% and 28%, respectively). Spatially, these differences are more noticeable in locations with higher NO2 and population values, where the highest health estimates were obtained. When the daily NO2 exposure was less than 6 µg.m−3, a fact that occurred in 95% of the domain cells and in both periods, relatively small differences between approaches were found. Analysing the seasonality effect, total health impacts derived from the linear and nonlinear applications were greater in summer (around 18% in both approaches). This happens due to the magnitude and spatial variability of NO2, as the other health input metrics remained constant. This exploratory research in local scale health impact assessment (HIA) demonstrated that the use of refined input data could contribute to more accurate health estimates and that the nonlinear approach is probably the most suitable for characterising air pollution episodes, thus providing important support in HIA.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.