ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE & PRACTICES ON FIRE SAFETY AMONG HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS IN CLINICAL LABORATORY OF TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN NORTH INDIA - A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

S. Suneja
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE & PRACTICES ON FIRE SAFETY AMONG HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS IN CLINICAL LABORATORY OF TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN NORTH INDIA - A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY","authors":"S. Suneja","doi":"10.36106/gjra/2401001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Fire safety is of paramount importance in healthcare settings, particularly in clinical\nlaboratories where hazardous substances, ammable materials, and complex equipment are frequently\npresent. Knowledge and practices of health care workers about re safety prevention is essential to ensure the well-being of\npatients, staff, and the preservation of critical healthcare services. Material & Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out\nin clinical biochemistry laboratory of Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, during from April 2023 to August 2023. Study participants\nincluded the doctors, paramedical technical staff and group IV people. A questionnaire with close ended and open ended\nquestions was used for assessment. The data was tabulated in Microsoft MS-Excel data sheet and analysis was done using\nSPSS 27 version of statistical software. Categorical variables were presented as number, percentage and median. Qualitative\nvariables were compared using Chi-Square test and quantitative variables using Kruskal Wallis test. For statistical\nsignicance, p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically signicant. 63 HCWs Results participated in the study which\ngave a 100% response rate. Most of the participants were Doctors (42.86%) and Laboratory technicians (44.44%) with variable\nyears of work experience ranging from <1 year to >9 years. The results indicate that participants have a mean knowledge\nscore of 7.94 ± 1.4 and median of 8 whereas the mean practice score was 7.24 ± 1.28 with a median of 7 towards re safety.\nConclusion: The present hospital based study revealed that the majority of healthcare workers had signicant knowledge\nabout re safety but still considering the important role of every employee in a re accident, there is need to give re safety\ntraining to all health care workers at timely intervals.","PeriodicalId":12664,"journal":{"name":"Global journal for research analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal for research analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/2401001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Fire safety is of paramount importance in healthcare settings, particularly in clinical laboratories where hazardous substances, ammable materials, and complex equipment are frequently present. Knowledge and practices of health care workers about re safety prevention is essential to ensure the well-being of patients, staff, and the preservation of critical healthcare services. Material & Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in clinical biochemistry laboratory of Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, during from April 2023 to August 2023. Study participants included the doctors, paramedical technical staff and group IV people. A questionnaire with close ended and open ended questions was used for assessment. The data was tabulated in Microsoft MS-Excel data sheet and analysis was done using SPSS 27 version of statistical software. Categorical variables were presented as number, percentage and median. Qualitative variables were compared using Chi-Square test and quantitative variables using Kruskal Wallis test. For statistical signicance, p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically signicant. 63 HCWs Results participated in the study which gave a 100% response rate. Most of the participants were Doctors (42.86%) and Laboratory technicians (44.44%) with variable years of work experience ranging from <1 year to >9 years. The results indicate that participants have a mean knowledge score of 7.94 ± 1.4 and median of 8 whereas the mean practice score was 7.24 ± 1.28 with a median of 7 towards re safety. Conclusion: The present hospital based study revealed that the majority of healthcare workers had signicant knowledge about re safety but still considering the important role of every employee in a re accident, there is need to give re safety training to all health care workers at timely intervals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度北部三级医院临床实验室医护人员消防安全知识和实践评估--一项横断面研究
目标 消防安全在医疗机构中至关重要,尤其是在经常出现危险物质、 易燃材料和复杂设备的诊所实验室中。医护人员有关  消防安全的知识和实践对于确保患者、员工的健康和重要医疗服务的维护至关重要。材料与方法 一项横断面研究于 2023 年 4 月至 2023 年 8 月在新德里 Safdarjung 医院临床生化实验室进行。研究参与者包括医生、辅助医务技术人员和第四组人员。研究采用了包含封闭式和开放式问题的问卷进行评估。数据在 Microsoft MS-Excel 数据表中制表,并使用 SPSS 27 版统计软件进行分析。分类变量以数量、百分比和中位数表示。定性变量的比较采用 Chi-Square 检验,定量变量的比较采用 Kruskal Wallis 检验。在统计意义上,P 值小于 0.05 即为显著。63 名医务工作者参与了研究,回复率为 100%。大多数参与者是医生(42.86%)和实验室技术人员(44.44%),工作年限从 9 年不等。结果表明,参与者对 re 安全的平均认知分数为 7.94 ± 1.4,中位数为 8,而平均实践分数为 7.24 ± 1.28,中位数为 7。结论:这项以医院为基础的研究表明,大多数医护人员对,但考虑到每个员工在,因此有必要及时对所有医护人员进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RELEVANCE OF NURSE PRACTITIONER MIDWIVES IN INDIAN STATES INCLUDING ASSAM PAROXYSMAL SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIAS AND PRE-EXCITATION SYNDROMES: COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW A CLINICO-HEMATOLOGICAL PROFILE OF MICROCYTIC HYPOCHROMIC ANEMIA IN CHILDREN: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY INSURGENCY AND THE QUESTION OF STABILITY IN ASSAM COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TEAR FILM IN DIGITAL SCREEN USERS VERSUS NON-USERS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1