Comparison of Efficacy between Myo-Inositol versus Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Nurmeen Latif, Seema Rajar, Mehreen Yousuf, Sadaf Imtiaz, Sidrah Abbas, Zara Jamali
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy between Myo-Inositol versus Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome","authors":"Nurmeen Latif, Seema Rajar, Mehreen Yousuf, Sadaf Imtiaz, Sidrah Abbas, Zara Jamali","doi":"10.37185/lns.1.1.486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effectiveness of myo-inositol versus metformin in treating women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Department of Gynae Unit II, Dr. Ruth. K.M. Pfau th th Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan from 7 February 2019 to 6 August 2019.Methods: All eligible patients who visited the hospital were enrolled. The group-Aincluded females who received myo-inositol (n=35), whereas the group-B included females who received metformin (n=35). Females in the myo-inositol group were administered 1 gram of myo-inositol twice daily, while those in the metformin group were administered 500 mg of metformin twice daily. Regular follow-up visits were scheduled every two months, and the efficacy of the treatment was assessed after six months. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of the normalization of menstrual cycles and the achievement of ovulation.Results: The mean age in the myo-inositol and metformin groups was 23.92±3.70 and 23.68±4.23, respectively. The mean weight in the myoinositol and metformin groups was 59.23±2.07 and 61.79±5.92, respectively. Notably, the efficacy rates for the myo-inositol and metformin groups were 68.57% and 20%, respectively with p-value=0.001.Conclusion: Myo-inositol was found to demonstrate significant superiority over metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome.How to cite this: Latif N, Rajar S, Yousuf M, Imtiaz S, Abbas S, Jamali Z. Comparison of Efficacy Between Myo-Inositol versus Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 48-53. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.486","PeriodicalId":516717,"journal":{"name":"Life and Science","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of myo-inositol versus metformin in treating women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Department of Gynae Unit II, Dr. Ruth. K.M. Pfau th th Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan from 7 February 2019 to 6 August 2019.Methods: All eligible patients who visited the hospital were enrolled. The group-Aincluded females who received myo-inositol (n=35), whereas the group-B included females who received metformin (n=35). Females in the myo-inositol group were administered 1 gram of myo-inositol twice daily, while those in the metformin group were administered 500 mg of metformin twice daily. Regular follow-up visits were scheduled every two months, and the efficacy of the treatment was assessed after six months. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of the normalization of menstrual cycles and the achievement of ovulation.Results: The mean age in the myo-inositol and metformin groups was 23.92±3.70 and 23.68±4.23, respectively. The mean weight in the myoinositol and metformin groups was 59.23±2.07 and 61.79±5.92, respectively. Notably, the efficacy rates for the myo-inositol and metformin groups were 68.57% and 20%, respectively with p-value=0.001.Conclusion: Myo-inositol was found to demonstrate significant superiority over metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome.How to cite this: Latif N, Rajar S, Yousuf M, Imtiaz S, Abbas S, Jamali Z. Comparison of Efficacy Between Myo-Inositol versus Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 48-53. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.486
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌醇与二甲双胍对多囊卵巢综合征妇女的疗效比较
研究目的比较肌醇与二甲双胍治疗多囊卵巢综合征妇女的效果:横断面研究:研究地点和时间:研究在鲁思博士(Dr. Ruth. K.M. Pfau th.K.M. Pfau th th Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan from 7 February 2019 to 6 August 2019.Methods:所有到医院就诊的符合条件的患者均被纳入。A组包括接受肌醇治疗的女性(35人),B组包括接受二甲双胍治疗的女性(35人)。肌醇组女性每天服用两次肌醇,每次1克;二甲双胍组女性每天服用两次二甲双胍,每次500毫克。每两个月进行一次定期随访,六个月后对疗效进行评估。疗效根据月经周期是否正常和是否排卵进行评估:肌醇组和二甲双胍组的平均年龄分别为(23.92±3.70)岁和(23.68±4.23)岁。肌醇组和二甲双胍组的平均体重分别为(59.23±2.07)和(61.79±5.92)。值得注意的是,肌醇组和二甲双胍组的有效率分别为 68.57% 和 20%,P 值=0.001:在治疗多囊卵巢综合征方面,肌醇明显优于二甲双胍:Latif N, Rajar S, Yousuf M, Imtiaz S, Abbas S, Jamali Z.肌醇与二甲双胍对多囊卵巢综合征妇女的疗效比较》。生命与科学2024; 5(1):48-53. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.486
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Awareness of the Green Dentistry Concept among Dental Professionals in Tertiary Care Dental Hospital, Rawalpindi Impact of Short-Term Arsenic Exposure on Hormonal Balance and Fibrosis in Sprague Dawley Rats Prevalence of Obesity with its Associated Modifiable Risk Factors among Adolescents of Aged 17-24 Years: Cross-Sectional Study Frequency of Self Medication Among Health Science Students in Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan Hepatoprotective Effect of Aqueous Neem Leaves Extract on Hepatocytes and Nuclear Diameter of Albino Wistar Rats Induced with Erythromycin Toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1