Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Distinguishing Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions

Kanza Afzal, Nadia Gul, Khalid Mehmood, Sobia Jawwad, Bushra Iqbal
{"title":"Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Distinguishing Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions","authors":"Kanza Afzal, Nadia Gul, Khalid Mehmood, Sobia Jawwad, Bushra Iqbal","doi":"10.37185/lns.1.1.416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions, keeping histopathology as the gold standard.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, POF th th Hospital, Wah Cantt, Pakistan over a period of six months from 11th  July 2021 to 11th January 2022.Methods: A total of 200 women presenting with suspicion of breast malignancy were selected consecutively from the outpatient department, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis(DBT) was performed, followed by a biopsy of the specimen to confirm the findings on histopathology. Results: The average age of the sample was 48.3 + 7.1 years, ranging between 35 and 60 years. Palpable breast lump was recorded in 44.5%, pain in 33%, and nipple discharge in 35.5%. Family history of breast Ca was present in 25.5. On Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), 58.5% of lesions were labeled as malignant, while 53.5% were labeled as malignant on follow-up histopathology. On applying the formulae for calculation, the sensitivity of DBT was found to be 86% and specificity 73.1%. The positive predictive value of the DBT is 78.6%, and the negative predictive value is 81.9%.Conclusion: In conclusion, Digital Breast Tomosynthesisis a significantly sensitive and specific tool for detecting malignant breast lesions in women suspected of breast carcinoma.How to cite this: Afzal K, Gul N, Mehmood K, Jawwad S, Iqbal B. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Distinguishing Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 3-8. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.416 \n ","PeriodicalId":516717,"journal":{"name":"Life and Science","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions, keeping histopathology as the gold standard.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, POF th th Hospital, Wah Cantt, Pakistan over a period of six months from 11th  July 2021 to 11th January 2022.Methods: A total of 200 women presenting with suspicion of breast malignancy were selected consecutively from the outpatient department, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis(DBT) was performed, followed by a biopsy of the specimen to confirm the findings on histopathology. Results: The average age of the sample was 48.3 + 7.1 years, ranging between 35 and 60 years. Palpable breast lump was recorded in 44.5%, pain in 33%, and nipple discharge in 35.5%. Family history of breast Ca was present in 25.5. On Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), 58.5% of lesions were labeled as malignant, while 53.5% were labeled as malignant on follow-up histopathology. On applying the formulae for calculation, the sensitivity of DBT was found to be 86% and specificity 73.1%. The positive predictive value of the DBT is 78.6%, and the negative predictive value is 81.9%.Conclusion: In conclusion, Digital Breast Tomosynthesisis a significantly sensitive and specific tool for detecting malignant breast lesions in women suspected of breast carcinoma.How to cite this: Afzal K, Gul N, Mehmood K, Jawwad S, Iqbal B. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Distinguishing Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 3-8. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.416  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估数字乳腺断层扫描在区分乳腺恶性和良性病变方面的诊断准确性
研究目的研究旨在确定数字乳腺断层扫描在诊断恶性和良性病变方面的诊断准确性,并将组织病理学作为金标准:横断面研究:研究地点和时间:2021 年 7 月 11 日至 2022 年 1 月 11 日,为期 6 个月,在巴基斯坦 Wah Cantt 市 POF th th 医院放射诊断部进行:方法:从门诊部连续选取 200 名怀疑患有乳腺恶性肿瘤的妇女,进行数字乳腺断层扫描(DBT),然后对标本进行活检,以确认组织病理学检查结果。结果样本的平均年龄为 48.3 + 7.1 岁,介于 35 岁和 60 岁之间。可触及乳房肿块的占 44.5%,疼痛的占 33%,乳头溢液的占 35.5%。25.5%的患者有乳腺癌家族史。在数字乳腺断层扫描(DBT)中,58.5%的病变被标记为恶性,而在后续组织病理学检查中,53.5%的病变被标记为恶性。根据计算公式,DBT 的灵敏度为 86%,特异度为 73.1%。DBT的阳性预测值为78.6%,阴性预测值为81.9%:总之,数字乳腺断层扫描是检测疑似乳腺癌妇女乳腺恶性病变的敏感性和特异性都很高的工具:Afzal K, Gul N, Mehmood K, Jawwad S, Iqbal B. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Distinguishing Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.生命与科学》。2024; 5(1):3-8. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.416
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Awareness of the Green Dentistry Concept among Dental Professionals in Tertiary Care Dental Hospital, Rawalpindi Impact of Short-Term Arsenic Exposure on Hormonal Balance and Fibrosis in Sprague Dawley Rats Prevalence of Obesity with its Associated Modifiable Risk Factors among Adolescents of Aged 17-24 Years: Cross-Sectional Study Frequency of Self Medication Among Health Science Students in Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan Hepatoprotective Effect of Aqueous Neem Leaves Extract on Hepatocytes and Nuclear Diameter of Albino Wistar Rats Induced with Erythromycin Toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1