“We know what we do”: an agency-structure analysis of political vigilantism in Ghana

P. Osei-Kufuor, Richard Ametefe, Sabina Appiah-Boateng, Kaderi Noagah Bukar, Alexander Quarshie
{"title":"“We know what we do”: an agency-structure analysis of political vigilantism in Ghana","authors":"P. Osei-Kufuor, Richard Ametefe, Sabina Appiah-Boateng, Kaderi Noagah Bukar, Alexander Quarshie","doi":"10.4314/ajosi.v6i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political vigilantism has come out as an offshoot of the violence that characterises multi-party elections in Ghana. Several studies on political vigilantism give primacy to the role of structural factors in explaining the phenomenon in Ghana. However, such a notion deprives political vigilantes of any sense of agency and further evades how the understanding of the interaction between agency and structure can offer deeper insights into the phenomenon of political vigilantism. The paper argues that political vigilantes should be characterised as agents who can make decisions about the actions that they undertake and not solely determined by the constraints of structure. The actions of political vigilantes are mediated through social structures that shape the options available to them. Using purposive and snowball sampling techniques, 41 key informants were selected for the study in Accra, Kumasi and Tamale. The study employed both primary and secondary data sources. Whereas secondary data was sourced from desk reviews, primary data was collected through interviews and focus group discussions. The narratives were thematically analysed. The study findings show that members of political vigilante groups are conscious agents and for that matter decide and act either autonomously or relationally despite existing pressures from social structures. In addition, the paper shows that the exercise of agency among the vigilantes is inseparable from structure as the structure is reproduced and changed through the actions of the political vigilantes who in turn are shaped through the structures that they occupy. Therefore, policy responses to political violence should consider the two sides of the equation by working simultaneously on the behaviour of political actors and resolving the circumstances that facilitate political violence.","PeriodicalId":516757,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Social Issues","volume":"56 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajosi.v6i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political vigilantism has come out as an offshoot of the violence that characterises multi-party elections in Ghana. Several studies on political vigilantism give primacy to the role of structural factors in explaining the phenomenon in Ghana. However, such a notion deprives political vigilantes of any sense of agency and further evades how the understanding of the interaction between agency and structure can offer deeper insights into the phenomenon of political vigilantism. The paper argues that political vigilantes should be characterised as agents who can make decisions about the actions that they undertake and not solely determined by the constraints of structure. The actions of political vigilantes are mediated through social structures that shape the options available to them. Using purposive and snowball sampling techniques, 41 key informants were selected for the study in Accra, Kumasi and Tamale. The study employed both primary and secondary data sources. Whereas secondary data was sourced from desk reviews, primary data was collected through interviews and focus group discussions. The narratives were thematically analysed. The study findings show that members of political vigilante groups are conscious agents and for that matter decide and act either autonomously or relationally despite existing pressures from social structures. In addition, the paper shows that the exercise of agency among the vigilantes is inseparable from structure as the structure is reproduced and changed through the actions of the political vigilantes who in turn are shaped through the structures that they occupy. Therefore, policy responses to political violence should consider the two sides of the equation by working simultaneously on the behaviour of political actors and resolving the circumstances that facilitate political violence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我们知道我们在做什么":对加纳政治私刑的机构-结构分析
政治私刑是加纳多党选举暴力的一个分支。一些关于政治私刑的研究将结构性因素在解释加纳政治私刑现象中的作用放在首位。然而,这种观念剥夺了政治义警的任何能动性,并进一步回避了对能动性与结构之间相互作用的理解如何为政治义警现象提供更深刻的见解。本文认为,政治义警应被定性为能够对其所采取的行动做出决定的代理人,而不仅仅是由结构的限制所决定的。政治义警的行动受到社会结构的影响,而社会结构决定了他们的选择。本研究采用目的性抽样和滚雪球抽样技术,在阿克拉、库马西和塔马利选取了 41 名关键信息提供者。研究同时采用了第一手数据和第二手数据来源。二级数据来源于案头审查,一级数据则通过访谈和焦点小组讨论收集。对叙述进行了专题分析。研究结果表明,政治民团成员是有意识的行为主体,因此,尽管存在来自社会结构的压力,他们仍可自主或通过关系做出决定并采取行动。此外,本文还表明,民团成员行使代理权与结构密不可分,因为结构通过政治民团成员的行动而再生产和改变,而政治民团成员的行动又通过他们所占据的结构而形成。因此,应对政治暴力的政策应考虑到等式的两个方面,既要解决政治行为者的行为问题,又要解决助长政治暴力的环境问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Religious values and poverty in Douala Corporate visual identity change vs corporate reputation: the case of a Pan-African Bank Navigating campus life in a pandemic: the social and academic realities of students in Ghana’s public universities during covid-19 We shall live: the experiences and responses of women to marginality in the ongoing Alavanyo - Nkonya land conflict in Ghana Entrepreneurship education and new business creation among Ebonyi State University Graduates (2014-2020)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1