Proximate, Dietary Fibre and Organoleptic Analysis of Mung Beans Yoghurt

Adisti Qamahadlina, Fatma Zuhrotun Nisa, Fasty Arum Utami
{"title":"Proximate, Dietary Fibre and Organoleptic Analysis of Mung Beans Yoghurt","authors":"Adisti Qamahadlina, Fatma Zuhrotun Nisa, Fasty Arum Utami","doi":"10.24940/theijst/2023/v11/i10/st2310-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mung beans have the potential to be processed into functional food. Mung beans are known as high-nutrition foods, especially protein and dietary fibre. One of the alternatives in processing mung beans is fermentation, which will produce mung bean yoghurt. The fermentation process can increase the nutritional value of mung beans. Besides that, the fermentation of mung bean yoghurt can also increase the consumer acceptability and economic value of mung bean. The objective of this research is to determine the ash content, water content, protein content, fat content, carbohydrate content, and dietary fibre content of mung bean yoghurt, and also to find out the results of organoleptic analysis of mung bean yoghurt. This is a cross-sectional study, measuring every variable at one time on mung bean yoghurt. Organoleptic test, include the colour, aroma, flavour and texture of yoghurt were measured among 30 semi-trained panelists. Mung bean yoghurt contains 84 (45%) of water, 0 (7%) of ash, 7 (26%) of protein, 0 (15%) of fat, 7 (44%) of carbohydrates and 3 (66%) of dietary fibre. For organoleptic analysis, the color of mung bean yoghurt does not differ significantly compare to commercial cow milk yoghurt. While for the aroma, flavour, and texture, mungbean yoghurt differs significantly from commercial cow milk yoghurt. This research can be concluded that the protein and dietary fibre content of mung beans yoghurt is higher than commercial cow milk yoghurt. However, mung bean yoghurt has less fat than commercial cow milk yoghurt. The aroma, flavour, colour of commercial cow milk yoghurt is preferable to mung bean yoghurt.","PeriodicalId":510026,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Science & Technoledge","volume":"247 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Science & Technoledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijst/2023/v11/i10/st2310-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mung beans have the potential to be processed into functional food. Mung beans are known as high-nutrition foods, especially protein and dietary fibre. One of the alternatives in processing mung beans is fermentation, which will produce mung bean yoghurt. The fermentation process can increase the nutritional value of mung beans. Besides that, the fermentation of mung bean yoghurt can also increase the consumer acceptability and economic value of mung bean. The objective of this research is to determine the ash content, water content, protein content, fat content, carbohydrate content, and dietary fibre content of mung bean yoghurt, and also to find out the results of organoleptic analysis of mung bean yoghurt. This is a cross-sectional study, measuring every variable at one time on mung bean yoghurt. Organoleptic test, include the colour, aroma, flavour and texture of yoghurt were measured among 30 semi-trained panelists. Mung bean yoghurt contains 84 (45%) of water, 0 (7%) of ash, 7 (26%) of protein, 0 (15%) of fat, 7 (44%) of carbohydrates and 3 (66%) of dietary fibre. For organoleptic analysis, the color of mung bean yoghurt does not differ significantly compare to commercial cow milk yoghurt. While for the aroma, flavour, and texture, mungbean yoghurt differs significantly from commercial cow milk yoghurt. This research can be concluded that the protein and dietary fibre content of mung beans yoghurt is higher than commercial cow milk yoghurt. However, mung bean yoghurt has less fat than commercial cow milk yoghurt. The aroma, flavour, colour of commercial cow milk yoghurt is preferable to mung bean yoghurt.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿豆酸奶的物理性质、膳食纤维和感官分析
绿豆具有加工成功能食品的潜力。绿豆是众所周知的高营养食品,尤其是蛋白质和膳食纤维。绿豆加工的替代方法之一是发酵,这将产生绿豆酸奶。发酵过程可以提高绿豆的营养价值。此外,发酵绿豆酸奶还能提高绿豆的消费者接受度和经济价值。本研究的目的是测定绿豆酸奶的灰分含量、水分含量、蛋白质含量、脂肪含量、碳水化合物含量和膳食纤维含量,并找出绿豆酸奶的感官分析结果。这是一项横断面研究,一次性测量绿豆酸奶的每个变量。感官测试包括酸奶的颜色、香气、风味和质地,由 30 名经过半培训的小组成员进行测量。绿豆酸奶含水 84(45%)、灰分 0(7%)、蛋白质 7(26%)、脂肪 0(15%)、碳水化合物 7(44%)和膳食纤维 3(66%)。在感官分析方面,绿豆酸奶的颜色与商业牛奶酸奶相比没有明显差异。而在香气、风味和质地方面,绿豆酸奶与商品牛乳酸奶有显著差异。这项研究得出的结论是,绿豆酸奶的蛋白质和膳食纤维含量高于商用牛奶酸奶。不过,绿豆酸奶的脂肪含量低于商品牛乳酸奶。商品牛乳酸奶的香气、味道和颜色都优于绿豆酸奶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drivers and Barriers of Timber for Building Construction in Nigeria: A Case Study of Akure, Ondo State Drivers and Barriers of Timber for Building Construction in Nigeria: A Case Study of Akure, Ondo State Chemical Profile, Amino Acid Characteristics and Phytochemical Study of Mentha Piperita Leaf Protein Concentrates The Role of Man on Land Cover Dynamics in the Jakiri Area, N.W. Region of Cameroon Determinants of New Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in Namibia: A Retrospective Observational Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1