Being Essential and Feeling Expendable: Black Female Clinicians’ Narratives About Working in the U.S. During Dual Pandemics

Heath H. Hightower
{"title":"Being Essential and Feeling Expendable: Black Female Clinicians’ Narratives About Working in the U.S. During Dual Pandemics","authors":"Heath H. Hightower","doi":"10.29333/ajqr/14097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically and in the present day, Black women’s positionality in the U.S. has paradoxically situated them in a society where they are both intrinsically essential and treated as expendable. This positionality, known as gendered racism, manifests commonly in professional environments and results in myriad harms. In response, Black women have developed, honed, and practiced a range of coping styles to mitigate the insidious effects of gendered racism. While often effective in the short-term, these techniques frequently complicate Black women’s well-being. For Black female clinicians who experience gendered racism and work on the frontlines of community mental health, myriad bio-psycho-social-spiritual harms compound. This project provided an opportunity for Black female clinicians from across the U.S. to share their experiences during the dual pandemics of COVID-19 and anti-Black violence. I conducted in-depth interviews with clinicians (n=14) between the ages of 30 and 58. Using the Listening Guide voice-centered approach to data generation and analysis, I identified four voices to help answer this project’s central question: How do you experience being a Black female clinician in the U.S.? The voices of self, pride, vigilance, and mediating narrated the complex ways participants experienced their workplaces. This complexity seemed to be context-specific, depending on whether the clinicians worked in predominantly White workplaces (PWW), a mix of PWW and private practice, or private practice exclusively. Participants who worked only in PWW experienced the greatest stress, oppression, and burnout risk, while participants who worked exclusively in private practice reported more joy, more authenticity, and more job satisfaction. These findings have implications for mentoring, supporting, and retaining Black female clinicians.","PeriodicalId":93517,"journal":{"name":"American journal of qualitative research","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of qualitative research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically and in the present day, Black women’s positionality in the U.S. has paradoxically situated them in a society where they are both intrinsically essential and treated as expendable. This positionality, known as gendered racism, manifests commonly in professional environments and results in myriad harms. In response, Black women have developed, honed, and practiced a range of coping styles to mitigate the insidious effects of gendered racism. While often effective in the short-term, these techniques frequently complicate Black women’s well-being. For Black female clinicians who experience gendered racism and work on the frontlines of community mental health, myriad bio-psycho-social-spiritual harms compound. This project provided an opportunity for Black female clinicians from across the U.S. to share their experiences during the dual pandemics of COVID-19 and anti-Black violence. I conducted in-depth interviews with clinicians (n=14) between the ages of 30 and 58. Using the Listening Guide voice-centered approach to data generation and analysis, I identified four voices to help answer this project’s central question: How do you experience being a Black female clinician in the U.S.? The voices of self, pride, vigilance, and mediating narrated the complex ways participants experienced their workplaces. This complexity seemed to be context-specific, depending on whether the clinicians worked in predominantly White workplaces (PWW), a mix of PWW and private practice, or private practice exclusively. Participants who worked only in PWW experienced the greatest stress, oppression, and burnout risk, while participants who worked exclusively in private practice reported more joy, more authenticity, and more job satisfaction. These findings have implications for mentoring, supporting, and retaining Black female clinicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人女临床医生关于在双重大流行病期间在美国工作的叙述:黑人女性临床医生关于在双重流行病期间在美国工作的叙述
在历史上和今天,黑人妇女在美国的地位使她们处于一个矛盾的社会中,在这个社会中,她们既是固有的基本要素,又被视为消耗品。这种被称为 "性别种族主义 "的地位在职业环境中表现得十分普遍,并造成了无数伤害。为此,黑人女性发展、磨练并实践了一系列应对方式,以减轻性别种族主义的阴险影响。虽然这些技巧通常在短期内有效,但经常会使黑人女性的福祉复杂化。对于经历过性别种族主义并在社区心理健康第一线工作的黑人女临床医生来说,无数的生物-心理-社会-精神伤害会加重她们的负担。本项目为来自美国各地的黑人女性临床医生提供了一个机会,让她们分享在 COVID-19 和反黑人暴力双重流行期间的经历。我对年龄在 30 岁至 58 岁之间的临床医生(14 人)进行了深入访谈。通过使用 "倾听指南 "以声音为中心的数据生成和分析方法,我确定了四种声音来帮助回答本项目的中心问题:作为一名美国黑人女性临床医生,您有怎样的体验?自我的声音、自豪的声音、警惕的声音和调解的声音叙述了参与者体验工作场所的复杂方式。这种复杂性似乎是因环境而异的,这取决于临床医生是在白人占主导地位的工作场所(PWW)工作,还是在白人占主导地位的工作场所和私人诊所混合工作,或者只在私人诊所工作。只在白人工作场所工作的参与者经历了最大的压力、压迫和职业倦怠风险,而只在私人诊所工作的参与者则报告了更多的快乐、更多的真实性和更多的工作满意度。这些发现对指导、支持和留住黑人女性临床医生具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Adapting to a New Reality”: Older Adults’ Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic Adult ESL Learners’ Perceptions of Participatory Teaching Methods: A Narrative Inquiry Being Essential and Feeling Expendable: Black Female Clinicians’ Narratives About Working in the U.S. During Dual Pandemics ‘White Trash’ in the Academy: Working-class Women Professors Discuss their Backgrounds and Education The Difficulty of Bearing Witness: Experiences of Educators and Therapists with Childhood Trauma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1