Impact of Virtual Simulation to Teach EMS Personnel Respiratory Failure Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ayanna Walker, Keegan McNally, L. Ganti, Nubaha Elahi, C. Van Dillen, Parth Patel, Ariel Vera
{"title":"Impact of Virtual Simulation to Teach EMS Personnel Respiratory Failure Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Ayanna Walker, Keegan McNally, L. Ganti, Nubaha Elahi, C. Van Dillen, Parth Patel, Ariel Vera","doi":"10.62186/001c.91500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a unique way to provide simulation education to paramedics during the Coronavirus pandemic, without some of the logistical concerns that accompany traditional in-person simulation. Our county EMS personnel were divided in groups of 3-6 for the virtual simulation conducted by a physician facilitator who was remotely broadcasted to the EMS team performing tasks on a mannequin. A post-simulation survey was conducted to determine how the simulation affected their comfort level with managing respiratory failure in both suspected COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The 42 EMS personnel responding to the survey felt an increased comfort level in managing respiratory failure in a suspected or known COVID-19 patient after the virtual simulation. There was an increase in “extremely comfortable” responses from 24% to 43% before and after the simulation, and a decrease in “somewhat uncomfortable” responses from 10% to 0%. Respondents had extensive prior EMS experience, with 95% stating 2+ years working in EMS, and 33% with more than 10 year’s experience. Only 12% of the responders stated they underwent simulation training once a month or more, with 64% stating “a few times per year”. 86% of the responders felt the video platform was easy to use. The most common technical difficulty involved audio problems. EMS personnel undergoing a virtual simulation and debrief in the management of respiratory failure in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic felt more comfortable in their management of these patients after their sessions. The majority recommended continuing this type of training in the future.","PeriodicalId":516872,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine & Surgery","volume":"125 1-3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62186/001c.91500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a unique way to provide simulation education to paramedics during the Coronavirus pandemic, without some of the logistical concerns that accompany traditional in-person simulation. Our county EMS personnel were divided in groups of 3-6 for the virtual simulation conducted by a physician facilitator who was remotely broadcasted to the EMS team performing tasks on a mannequin. A post-simulation survey was conducted to determine how the simulation affected their comfort level with managing respiratory failure in both suspected COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The 42 EMS personnel responding to the survey felt an increased comfort level in managing respiratory failure in a suspected or known COVID-19 patient after the virtual simulation. There was an increase in “extremely comfortable” responses from 24% to 43% before and after the simulation, and a decrease in “somewhat uncomfortable” responses from 10% to 0%. Respondents had extensive prior EMS experience, with 95% stating 2+ years working in EMS, and 33% with more than 10 year’s experience. Only 12% of the responders stated they underwent simulation training once a month or more, with 64% stating “a few times per year”. 86% of the responders felt the video platform was easy to use. The most common technical difficulty involved audio problems. EMS personnel undergoing a virtual simulation and debrief in the management of respiratory failure in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic felt more comfortable in their management of these patients after their sessions. The majority recommended continuing this type of training in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟仿真对在 COVID-19 大流行期间教授急救人员呼吸衰竭处理方法的影响
本研究提出了一种独特的方法,在冠状病毒大流行期间为护理人员提供模拟教育,而无需考虑传统的现场模拟所带来的一些后勤问题。我们县的急救人员被分成 3-6 人一组,由一名医生主持进行虚拟模拟,医生通过远程广播向急救小组传达在人体模型上执行任务的情况。模拟后进行了一项调查,以确定模拟对他们处理疑似 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 患者呼吸衰竭的舒适度有何影响。参与调查的 42 名急救人员认为,虚拟模拟后,他们在处理疑似或已知 COVID-19 患者呼吸衰竭时的舒适度有所提高。模拟前后,"非常舒适 "的比例从 24% 上升到 43%,"有点不舒适 "的比例从 10% 下降到 0%。受访者具有丰富的急救经验,95% 的受访者表示有 2 年以上的急救工作经验,33% 的受访者有 10 年以上的工作经验。只有 12% 的受访者表示他们每月接受一次或更多次模拟训练,64% 的受访者表示 "每年几次"。86% 的受访者认为视频平台易于使用。最常见的技术问题是音频问题。在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,接受呼吸衰竭管理虚拟模拟和汇报培训的急救人员在培训后感觉在管理这些病人时更加得心应手。大多数人建议今后继续开展此类培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rupture of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm The Brilliance, Attitude, Leadership and Materials (BALM) framework of clinical excellence: an adoptable model for sub-Saharan Africa A Geriatric Patient with Fewer Classical Symptoms of Hyperthyroidism Four Common Upper Body Injuries in Tennis Players: Prevention, Description, and Treatment History of the Ultrasound Machine in Obstetrics and Gynecology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1