Shifting Modes of Labor Regulation in Global Supply Chains

IF 1.3 Asia Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1353/asp.2024.a918873
S. Kuruvilla
{"title":"Shifting Modes of Labor Regulation in Global Supply Chains","authors":"S. Kuruvilla","doi":"10.1353/asp.2024.a918873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"executive summary: This essay outlines the changing modes of regulation of labor conditions in global apparel supply chains, which are mostly concentrated in Asia; assesses the effectiveness of 25 years of private voluntary regulation by global firms; and examines critically the implications of new European regulation now mandating what was previously a voluntary corporate activity. main argumentAsia is the global center of apparel production, with Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Vietnam all being major exporters. Since the 1990s, activist pressure in developed country markets has forced global apparel and footwear companies to adopt voluntary methods to ensure that their products are not made under sweatshop conditions. Companies developed codes of conduct for the first-tier factories in their supply chains and found ways to audit whether supplier factories were in compliance. However, this voluntary private-regulation model has not been adequate to alleviate labor and workplace concerns in global apparel supply chains. A shift from private regulation to public regulation—the beginning of which may be currently underway in the European Union with the recent introduction of mandatory due diligence legislation—may prove to be a more effective means of bettering labor rights and conditions. policy implications• If the recent EU legislation allows global companies to be legally liable for violations of mandatory due diligence requirements regarding labor rights and conditions in supply chains, a sea change in worker rights and labor practices could occur. • The new legislation would require global companies to adopt more responsible purchasing practices so that their practices are not responsible for labor violations. • The EU legislation could have an impact on sourcing locations, as companies compete for locations that are more likely to provide institutional environments with lower risk of violations. Global suppliers would have a greater incentive to take the high road in terms of employment practices to obtain more business from European buyers. National governments in apparel-exporting countries may be motivated to improve enforcement of labor regulations.","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2024.a918873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

executive summary: This essay outlines the changing modes of regulation of labor conditions in global apparel supply chains, which are mostly concentrated in Asia; assesses the effectiveness of 25 years of private voluntary regulation by global firms; and examines critically the implications of new European regulation now mandating what was previously a voluntary corporate activity. main argumentAsia is the global center of apparel production, with Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Vietnam all being major exporters. Since the 1990s, activist pressure in developed country markets has forced global apparel and footwear companies to adopt voluntary methods to ensure that their products are not made under sweatshop conditions. Companies developed codes of conduct for the first-tier factories in their supply chains and found ways to audit whether supplier factories were in compliance. However, this voluntary private-regulation model has not been adequate to alleviate labor and workplace concerns in global apparel supply chains. A shift from private regulation to public regulation—the beginning of which may be currently underway in the European Union with the recent introduction of mandatory due diligence legislation—may prove to be a more effective means of bettering labor rights and conditions. policy implications• If the recent EU legislation allows global companies to be legally liable for violations of mandatory due diligence requirements regarding labor rights and conditions in supply chains, a sea change in worker rights and labor practices could occur. • The new legislation would require global companies to adopt more responsible purchasing practices so that their practices are not responsible for labor violations. • The EU legislation could have an impact on sourcing locations, as companies compete for locations that are more likely to provide institutional environments with lower risk of violations. Global suppliers would have a greater incentive to take the high road in terms of employment practices to obtain more business from European buyers. National governments in apparel-exporting countries may be motivated to improve enforcement of labor regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球供应链中劳工监管模式的转变
内容提要:本文概述了全球服装供应链(主要集中在亚洲)中不断变化的劳动条件监管模式;评估了全球企业 25 年来的私人自愿监管的有效性;并批判性地研究了欧洲新法规的影响,这些法规现在强制要求企业开展以前属于自愿性质的活动。 主要论点 亚洲是全球服装生产的中心,孟加拉国、柬埔寨、中国、印度、印度尼西亚、巴基斯坦和越南都是主要的出口国。自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,发达国家市场上的激进分子施加压力,迫使全球服装和鞋类公司采取自愿方法,确保其产品不是在血汗工厂条件下生产的。各公司为其供应链中的一级工厂制定了行为准则,并想方设法审核供应商工厂是否遵守准则。然而,这种自愿性的私人监管模式并不足以缓解全球服装供应链中的劳工和工作场所问题。从私人监管到公共监管的转变--欧盟最近出台的强制性尽职调查立法可能是这一转变的开端--可能被证明是改善劳工权利和条件的更有效手段。 政策影响--如果欧盟最近的立法允许全球性公司对违反供应链中有关劳工权利和条件的强制性尽职调查要求的行为承担法律责任,那么工人权利和劳工实践可能会发生巨变。- 新立法将要求全球公司采取更负责任的采购行为,从而使其行为不对侵犯劳工权益的行为负责。- 欧盟立法可能会对采购地点产生影响,因为公司会竞相选择更有可能提供制度环境且违法风险较低的地点。全球供应商将有更大的动力在就业实践方面采取高标准,以从欧洲买家那里获得更多的业务。服装出口国家的政府可能会有动力改善劳动法规的执行情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
期刊最新文献
In the Middle of It All: Unpacking South Korea's Foreign Policy Priorities Shifting Modes of Labor Regulation in Global Supply Chains Can South Korea Really Develop a Grand Strategy? Subnational Powerhouses or Setbacks? The Roles of Chinese Local Governments in U.S.-China Technological Competition Space-Based Missile Warning: An Opportunity to Deepen U.S.-Japan Security Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1