Blame culture: The line between blame and accountability in policing

Kathryn Farrow
{"title":"Blame culture: The line between blame and accountability in policing","authors":"Kathryn Farrow","doi":"10.1093/police/paae034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Policing is a job characterised by high levels of blame risk, with the notion of blame becoming particularly prominent feature in law enforcement in recent years, with organisations often being quick to identify other external bodies as being cognisant in perpetuating this problem. This paper investigates the extent to which fear of blame exists within policing organisations, as well as the techniques utilised by staff to neutralise this particular hazard. I will utilise Hood’s concept of ‘the blame game’ to investigate such techniques and will also outline how engaging in such games leads the organisation and its staff to pit themselves against one another by engaging in framing contests designed to shift the blame away from themselves onto other individuals within the organisation. This paper thus examines the extent to which policing organisations themselves perpetuate blaming practises and preserve the never-ending cycle of blame by engaging in such processes.","PeriodicalId":516781,"journal":{"name":"Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policing is a job characterised by high levels of blame risk, with the notion of blame becoming particularly prominent feature in law enforcement in recent years, with organisations often being quick to identify other external bodies as being cognisant in perpetuating this problem. This paper investigates the extent to which fear of blame exists within policing organisations, as well as the techniques utilised by staff to neutralise this particular hazard. I will utilise Hood’s concept of ‘the blame game’ to investigate such techniques and will also outline how engaging in such games leads the organisation and its staff to pit themselves against one another by engaging in framing contests designed to shift the blame away from themselves onto other individuals within the organisation. This paper thus examines the extent to which policing organisations themselves perpetuate blaming practises and preserve the never-ending cycle of blame by engaging in such processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指责文化:警务工作中指责与问责之间的界限
警务工作的特点是指责风险较高,近年来,指责的概念在执法过程中变得尤为突出,各组织往往很快就会发现其他外部机构是造成这一问题的元凶。本文研究了警务组织内部对指责的恐惧程度,以及工作人员为消除这种特殊危险而使用的技巧。我将利用胡德(Hood)的 "指责游戏 "概念来研究此类技巧,并将概述参与此类游戏如何导致组织及其员工通过参与旨在将责任从自身转移到组织内其他个人身上的框架竞赛来相互指责。因此,本文探讨了警务组织本身在多大程度上通过参与此类过程延续了指责做法并保持了永无止境的指责循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proactive policing and traffic disturbances: A quasi-experiment in three Israeli cities Leveraging video evidence in domestic violence misdemeanour cases: Examination of case dispositions and case length Differentiating risk: The association between relationship type and risk of repeat victimization of domestic abuse Body-worn cameras and court proceedings: A qualitative study of police officers’ expectations Public expectations of police education in England and Wales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1