Anatomical and functional results of femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty compared to microkeratome-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Daniela Chacón-Zambrano, Jaime Andrés Suárez-Garavito, José Leonardo Ramírez Casas, Shirley M. Rosenstiehl, Matilde Mora
{"title":"Anatomical and functional results of femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty compared to microkeratome-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty","authors":"Daniela Chacón-Zambrano, Jaime Andrés Suárez-Garavito, José Leonardo Ramírez Casas, Shirley M. Rosenstiehl, Matilde Mora","doi":"10.4103/pajo.pajo_98_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Femtosecond laser devices have been praised for their precision in corneal surgery; however, their performance in endothelial corneal graft surgery is still in development compared to the standard microkeratome technique. The purpose of this study is to describe the anatomical and functional differences in surgical outcomes between microkeratome (mk) and femtosecond laser (fs) assisted Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).\n \n \n \n This is an analytic, observational, pilot study of patients who underwent mk-DSAEK or fs-DSAEK. The data were obtained from the clinical records and the institutional transplant registry with a focus on graft measurements, survival, transparency, visual acuity and was further analyzed.\n \n \n \n A total of 37 participants were included in the study with 70.3% (n = 26) of them being female and 29.7% of them being male (n = 11). Of the 37 eyes, 23 (62.2%) of them underwent mk-DSAEK and 14 (37.8%) of them underwent fs-DSAEK. Optimized femtosecond laser parameters are reported. There was a statistically significant difference in donor graft thickness which was thinner in the fs-DSAEK group with a median of 110 mm interquartile range (IQR) (102.25–117.5) versus a median of 233 mm IQR (219–243.75) P = 0.00 in the mk-DSAEK group. There were no significant differences for other variables between techniques.\n \n \n \n Fs-DSAEK allowed significantly thinner graft obtention in comparison to mk-DSAEK; however, there were no significant differences between mk-DSAEK and fs-DSAEK in terms of transparency, graft survival, or visual acuity.\n","PeriodicalId":508483,"journal":{"name":"The Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/pajo.pajo_98_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Femtosecond laser devices have been praised for their precision in corneal surgery; however, their performance in endothelial corneal graft surgery is still in development compared to the standard microkeratome technique. The purpose of this study is to describe the anatomical and functional differences in surgical outcomes between microkeratome (mk) and femtosecond laser (fs) assisted Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). This is an analytic, observational, pilot study of patients who underwent mk-DSAEK or fs-DSAEK. The data were obtained from the clinical records and the institutional transplant registry with a focus on graft measurements, survival, transparency, visual acuity and was further analyzed. A total of 37 participants were included in the study with 70.3% (n = 26) of them being female and 29.7% of them being male (n = 11). Of the 37 eyes, 23 (62.2%) of them underwent mk-DSAEK and 14 (37.8%) of them underwent fs-DSAEK. Optimized femtosecond laser parameters are reported. There was a statistically significant difference in donor graft thickness which was thinner in the fs-DSAEK group with a median of 110 mm interquartile range (IQR) (102.25–117.5) versus a median of 233 mm IQR (219–243.75) P = 0.00 in the mk-DSAEK group. There were no significant differences for other variables between techniques. Fs-DSAEK allowed significantly thinner graft obtention in comparison to mk-DSAEK; however, there were no significant differences between mk-DSAEK and fs-DSAEK in terms of transparency, graft survival, or visual acuity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞秒激光辅助下的脱落斑剥离自动内皮角膜成形术与微角膜辅助下的脱落斑剥离自动内皮角膜成形术的解剖和功能效果比较
飞秒激光设备因其在角膜手术中的精确性而备受赞誉;然而,与标准的微角膜刀技术相比,飞秒激光设备在角膜内皮移植手术中的性能仍处于发展阶段。本研究的目的是描述微角膜刀(mk)和飞秒激光(fs)辅助德斯米剥离自动内皮角膜移植术(DSAEK)在手术效果上的解剖和功能差异。 这是一项分析性、观察性、试验性研究,研究对象是接受了 mk-DSAEK 或 fs-DSAEK 的患者。研究数据来自临床记录和移植机构登记处,重点关注移植物的测量、存活率、透明度、视力,并进行了进一步分析。 共有 37 名参与者参与了研究,其中女性占 70.3%(n = 26),男性占 29.7%(n = 11)。在 37 只眼睛中,23 只(62.2%)接受了 mk-DSAEK,14 只(37.8%)接受了 fs-DSAEK。报告了优化的飞秒激光参数。供体移植物厚度在统计学上有显著差异,fs-DSAEK 组更薄,中位数为 110 毫米,四分位数间距 (IQR) 为 102.25-117.5,而 mk-DSAEK 组的中位数为 233 毫米,四分位数间距 (IQR) 为 219-243.75,P = 0.00。不同技术之间的其他变量无明显差异。 与mk-DSAEK相比,Fs-DSAEK的移植物植入厚度明显更薄;但在透明度、移植物存活率或视力方面,mk-DSAEK和fs-DSAEK没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diurnal variation of corneal epithelium and stroma measured by optical coherence tomography Ocular sporotrichosis in a pregnant woman Analysis of the histopathological results of patients submitted to pterygium excision Orbital cellulitis with exudative retinal detachment: A rare finding Pediatric retinal detachment: Anatomical and visual outcomes from tertiary eye center in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1