Reconstructing Practical Knowledge in Initial Training. A Qualitative Study

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Qualitative Methods Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/16094069241244862
María José Mayorga-Fernández, Mª del Pilar Sepúlveda-Ruiz, Elena García-Vila
{"title":"Reconstructing Practical Knowledge in Initial Training. A Qualitative Study","authors":"María José Mayorga-Fernández, Mª del Pilar Sepúlveda-Ruiz, Elena García-Vila","doi":"10.1177/16094069241244862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practical knowledge, acquired subconsciously, requires analysis and reflection for reconstruction, fostering its evolution into practical thinking. This study explored the practical knowledge of 104 first-year students in the early childhood education programme at the University of Malaga, aiming to scrutinise how it evolves through the lens of practical thinking following their participation in Lesson Study (LS) training. Using qualitative research methods, the data collection involved reflexive drawing, narratives, and discussion groups. The findings revealed that students’ practical knowledge predominantly revolved around teaching as cultural transmission, highlighting master classes and teacher-centric teaching-learning processes, with an adult-centric view of childhood and an underestimation of student capacities. Following the LS experience, significant reconfiguration occurred. Students developed a newfound appreciation for mentorship, recognising discrepancies between conceptualisations and implementations, and acknowledging the pivotal role of children. The study highlights the efficacy of reflexive drawing and discussion as tools for uncovering subconscious thoughts and facilitating reconstruction. To facilitate this evolution, training programs and participatory strategies are imperative for transforming practical knowledge.","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241244862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practical knowledge, acquired subconsciously, requires analysis and reflection for reconstruction, fostering its evolution into practical thinking. This study explored the practical knowledge of 104 first-year students in the early childhood education programme at the University of Malaga, aiming to scrutinise how it evolves through the lens of practical thinking following their participation in Lesson Study (LS) training. Using qualitative research methods, the data collection involved reflexive drawing, narratives, and discussion groups. The findings revealed that students’ practical knowledge predominantly revolved around teaching as cultural transmission, highlighting master classes and teacher-centric teaching-learning processes, with an adult-centric view of childhood and an underestimation of student capacities. Following the LS experience, significant reconfiguration occurred. Students developed a newfound appreciation for mentorship, recognising discrepancies between conceptualisations and implementations, and acknowledging the pivotal role of children. The study highlights the efficacy of reflexive drawing and discussion as tools for uncovering subconscious thoughts and facilitating reconstruction. To facilitate this evolution, training programs and participatory strategies are imperative for transforming practical knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初始培训中重构实用知识。定性研究
实践知识是在潜意识中获得的,需要通过分析和反思来重建,从而促进其向实践思维的演变。本研究探讨了马拉加大学幼儿教育专业 104 名一年级学生的实践知识,旨在通过他们参加课程学习(LS)培训后的实践思维视角,审视实践知识是如何演变的。数据收集采用定性研究方法,包括反思性绘画、叙述和小组讨论。研究结果表明,学生的实践知识主要围绕作为文化传播的教学,突出了大师班和以教师为中心的教学过程,以及以成人为中心的童年观和对学生能力的低估。通识教育经历之后,发生了重大的重组。学生们对导师制有了新的认识,认识到概念和实施之间的差异,并承认儿童的关键作用。这项研究强调了反思性绘画和讨论作为揭示潜意识想法和促进重建的工具的功效。为促进这一演变,培训计划和参与式战略对于转化实用知识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
International Journal of Qualitative Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Highlights Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus Launched In: 2002 Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC) Submit here International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
期刊最新文献
Investigating Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity: How Meta-Ethnography Contributes to the Study of Collaborative Research Practices Applying the Visual-Verbal Video Analysis Framework to Understand How Mental Illness is Represented in the TV Show Euphoria “Navigating the In-Between: A Cross-Cultural Researcher’s Fluid Positionality in West Africa” Dealing With Scam in Online Qualitative Research: Strategies and Ethical Considerations Participatory Health Research With Women From Refugee, Asylum-Seeker, and Migrant Backgrounds Living in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1