Formation Damage in CO2 Storage Wells – The Same, But Different

M. Byrne, R. Gilbert, R. Anderson
{"title":"Formation Damage in CO2 Storage Wells – The Same, But Different","authors":"M. Byrne, R. Gilbert, R. Anderson","doi":"10.2118/217859-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In many respects formation damage challenges in CO2 storage wells are similar to those in conventional oil and gas production wells and water and gas injection wells. But there are some differences from \"conventional\" well formation damage challenges. This paper outlines some issues specific to CO2 injection wells and proposes changes in focus prior to and during drilling and completion of these wells.\n CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) store can generally be split in to two categories – saline aquifers and depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs. Wells drilled and/or completed in these stores share some well injectivity challenges with conventional wells but also have some challenges specific to the store properties. In conventional injection wells it is generally accepted that well clean-up or back production prior to injection is beneficial as formation damage necessarily induced during well drilling and clean-up may be partially or fully removed. For saline aquifers and depleted hydrocarbon stores, well clean-up is normally not possible or practical. Direct injection after well completion is often required.\n A new workflow capturing the key steps required to assure optimum well injectivity over the well life cycle has been developed and will be outlined in the paper. This includes but is not limited to: detailed analysis of CO2 phase behaviour in and beyond the lower completion; lower completion selection criteria specific to CO2 stores; laboratory testing and modelling focussed on CO2 store formation damage challenges; direct injection challenges and successful mitigations; ice scale and hydrate challenges in CO2 storage wells.\n With increasing focus on CO2 storage globally, the workflow outlined presents an integrated approach to formation damage challenges. It demonstrates that although many of the challenges are similar to those in conventional wells, there are also some that are different and unique – the same, but different!","PeriodicalId":518997,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, February 21, 2024","volume":"1197 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, February 21, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217859-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many respects formation damage challenges in CO2 storage wells are similar to those in conventional oil and gas production wells and water and gas injection wells. But there are some differences from "conventional" well formation damage challenges. This paper outlines some issues specific to CO2 injection wells and proposes changes in focus prior to and during drilling and completion of these wells. CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) store can generally be split in to two categories – saline aquifers and depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs. Wells drilled and/or completed in these stores share some well injectivity challenges with conventional wells but also have some challenges specific to the store properties. In conventional injection wells it is generally accepted that well clean-up or back production prior to injection is beneficial as formation damage necessarily induced during well drilling and clean-up may be partially or fully removed. For saline aquifers and depleted hydrocarbon stores, well clean-up is normally not possible or practical. Direct injection after well completion is often required. A new workflow capturing the key steps required to assure optimum well injectivity over the well life cycle has been developed and will be outlined in the paper. This includes but is not limited to: detailed analysis of CO2 phase behaviour in and beyond the lower completion; lower completion selection criteria specific to CO2 stores; laboratory testing and modelling focussed on CO2 store formation damage challenges; direct injection challenges and successful mitigations; ice scale and hydrate challenges in CO2 storage wells. With increasing focus on CO2 storage globally, the workflow outlined presents an integrated approach to formation damage challenges. It demonstrates that although many of the challenges are similar to those in conventional wells, there are also some that are different and unique – the same, but different!
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化碳封存井的地层破坏--相同但不同
在许多方面,二氧化碳封存井所面临的地层破坏挑战与常规油气生产井和注水注气井类似。但与 "常规 "井的地层损害挑战也有一些不同之处。本文概述了 CO2 注水井特有的一些问题,并提出了在钻井和完井前以及钻井和完井过程中应重点关注的变化。CCS(碳捕集与封存)存储一般可分为两类--含盐含水层和枯竭碳氢化合物储层。在这些储层中钻探和/或完工的油井与常规油井一样,都会面临一些油井注入方面的挑战,但也会面临一些储层特性所特有的挑战。在常规注水井中,人们普遍认为在注水前进行油井清理或回采是有益的,因为在钻井和清理过程中必然引起的地层损害可能会部分或全部消除。对于含盐含水层和枯竭碳氢化合物储藏,通常不可能或不可能进行油井清理。通常需要在完井后直接注入。我们开发了一种新的工作流程,其中包含了在油井生命周期内确保最佳油井注入率所需的关键步骤,本文将对此进行概述。这包括但不限于:对下部完井内和完井后的二氧化碳相行为进行详细分析;针对二氧化碳封存的下部完井选择标准;针对二氧化碳封存地层破坏挑战的实验室测试和建模;直接注入挑战和成功的缓解措施;二氧化碳封存井中的冰垢和水合物挑战。随着全球对二氧化碳封存的关注日益增加,所概述的工作流程提出了应对地层损害挑战的综合方法。它表明,虽然许多挑战与常规井中的挑战相似,但也有一些不同和独特的挑战--相同但不同!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic Modeling of Wellbore Integrity During CO2 Injection in Deep Saline Aquifers Mechanisms of Degradation of Cement in CO2 Injection Wells: Maintaining the Integrity of CO2 Seals Formation Damage in CO2 Storage Wells – The Same, But Different Long-term Coreflood Testing with Biopolymers—A Laboratory Investigation Showing How Return Permeability Improves From 0 to 100 Percent by Getting a Critical Parameter Right Lessons Learned During Sand Control Operations in the Gulf of Mexico where Bridging is a Strong Possibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1