Unlocking Reservoir Potential: Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Reservoir Properties and Sweet Spots Identification

M. Khan, A. A. Bery, S. S. Ali, S. Awfi, Y. Bashir
{"title":"Unlocking Reservoir Potential: Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Reservoir Properties and Sweet Spots Identification","authors":"M. Khan, A. A. Bery, S. S. Ali, S. Awfi, Y. Bashir","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23557-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir properties prediction and sweet spots identification from seismic and well data is an essential process of hydrocarbon exploration and production. This study aims to develop a robust and reliable approach to predict reservoir properties such as acoustic impedance and porosity of a fluvio-deltaic depositional system from 3D seismic and well data using Machine Learning techniques and compare the results with conventional stochastic inversion.\n A comprehensive machine learning methodology has been applied to predict reservoir properties in both log-to-log and log-to-seismic domains. First, 1D predictive models were created using an Ensemble modelling process which consists of 4 models each from Random Forest, XGBoost and Neural Networks. This was used to predict missing logs for eight wells. Subsequently, a 3D time model with 2ms temporal thickness was built and a seismic stack volume, seismic attributes volumes (envelope, sweetness, RMS Amplitude etc.) and low frequency model were resampled to the model resolution. The conventional post-stack stochastic inversion process is executed in the model to generate acoustic impedance, which is subsequently utilized to compute porosity through the acoustic impedance versus porosity transform. 3D predictive models are then created by incorporating seismic attributes, low frequency model and the target acoustic impedance log (AI) to establish a relationship and predict the 3D acoustic impedance property within the model. Additionally, another regression function is generated, employing the predicted acoustic impedance versus porosity, to forecast the 3D porosity property.\n Machine Learning 1D predictive models enabled the prediction of partial or full missing logs such as gamma ray, density, compression sonic, neutron porosity, acoustic impedance (AI), and porosity (PHIE) to complete the full logs coverage on eight wells in the reservoir zones. XGBoost 1D models produced the best results for training with R^2 score of 0.93 and validation score of 0.87. The stochastic inversion approach enabled the generation of high-resolution acoustic impedance and porosity properties in the 3D model. 3D predictive models established a relationship of seismic attributes volumes with well logs (AI) at well locations and predicted the acoustic impedance property in the whole 3D volumes away from the wells. To assess the prediction accuracy, we employed a randomly-selected blind wells approach, and the optimal model achieved an 82% validation accuracy. Notably, Neural Networks exhibited superior performance in proximity to the well locations, with a decline in quality observed as we moved away from the wells. On the other hand, Random Forest and XGBoost consistently produced continuous results. The predictive properties of AI and porosity were combined to train an unsupervised Neural Network model for facies prediction. This process aided in identifying sweet spots associated with the optimal reservoir sand saturated with hydrocarbons.\n Machine learning prediction produced quick and satisfactory results that are comparable with conventional seismic inversion output but with minimum intervention of an interpreter and demonstrated the ability to handle large datasets. The applied approach allows the generation of multiple models using various seismic attributes to identify the best sand reservoir sweet spots for well placement and field developments projects. This approach can be used at an early stage of exploration where few wells are available. The output reservoir properties can be directly included in a 3D static model.","PeriodicalId":518539,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","volume":"254 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23557-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reservoir properties prediction and sweet spots identification from seismic and well data is an essential process of hydrocarbon exploration and production. This study aims to develop a robust and reliable approach to predict reservoir properties such as acoustic impedance and porosity of a fluvio-deltaic depositional system from 3D seismic and well data using Machine Learning techniques and compare the results with conventional stochastic inversion. A comprehensive machine learning methodology has been applied to predict reservoir properties in both log-to-log and log-to-seismic domains. First, 1D predictive models were created using an Ensemble modelling process which consists of 4 models each from Random Forest, XGBoost and Neural Networks. This was used to predict missing logs for eight wells. Subsequently, a 3D time model with 2ms temporal thickness was built and a seismic stack volume, seismic attributes volumes (envelope, sweetness, RMS Amplitude etc.) and low frequency model were resampled to the model resolution. The conventional post-stack stochastic inversion process is executed in the model to generate acoustic impedance, which is subsequently utilized to compute porosity through the acoustic impedance versus porosity transform. 3D predictive models are then created by incorporating seismic attributes, low frequency model and the target acoustic impedance log (AI) to establish a relationship and predict the 3D acoustic impedance property within the model. Additionally, another regression function is generated, employing the predicted acoustic impedance versus porosity, to forecast the 3D porosity property. Machine Learning 1D predictive models enabled the prediction of partial or full missing logs such as gamma ray, density, compression sonic, neutron porosity, acoustic impedance (AI), and porosity (PHIE) to complete the full logs coverage on eight wells in the reservoir zones. XGBoost 1D models produced the best results for training with R^2 score of 0.93 and validation score of 0.87. The stochastic inversion approach enabled the generation of high-resolution acoustic impedance and porosity properties in the 3D model. 3D predictive models established a relationship of seismic attributes volumes with well logs (AI) at well locations and predicted the acoustic impedance property in the whole 3D volumes away from the wells. To assess the prediction accuracy, we employed a randomly-selected blind wells approach, and the optimal model achieved an 82% validation accuracy. Notably, Neural Networks exhibited superior performance in proximity to the well locations, with a decline in quality observed as we moved away from the wells. On the other hand, Random Forest and XGBoost consistently produced continuous results. The predictive properties of AI and porosity were combined to train an unsupervised Neural Network model for facies prediction. This process aided in identifying sweet spots associated with the optimal reservoir sand saturated with hydrocarbons. Machine learning prediction produced quick and satisfactory results that are comparable with conventional seismic inversion output but with minimum intervention of an interpreter and demonstrated the ability to handle large datasets. The applied approach allows the generation of multiple models using various seismic attributes to identify the best sand reservoir sweet spots for well placement and field developments projects. This approach can be used at an early stage of exploration where few wells are available. The output reservoir properties can be directly included in a 3D static model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挖掘储层潜力:机器学习驱动的储层属性预测和甜点识别
从地震和油井数据中预测储层属性并识别甜点是油气勘探和生产的重要过程。本研究旨在开发一种稳健可靠的方法,利用机器学习技术从三维地震和油井数据中预测储层属性,如流体三角洲沉积系统的声阻抗和孔隙度,并将结果与传统的随机反演进行比较。在测井到测井和测井到地震领域,应用了一种全面的机器学习方法来预测储层属性。首先,使用集合建模过程创建一维预测模型,该过程由随机森林、XGBoost 和神经网络各 4 个模型组成。该模型用于预测 8 口井的缺失测井。随后,建立了一个时间厚度为 2 毫秒的三维时间模型,并根据模型分辨率对地震叠加体积、地震属性体积(包络、甜度、RMS 振幅等)和低频模型进行了重采样。在模型中执行传统的叠后随机反演过程,生成声阻抗,随后通过声阻抗与孔隙度转换计算孔隙度。然后,结合地震属性、低频模型和目标声阻抗记录(AI)创建三维预测模型,在模型中建立关系并预测三维声阻抗属性。此外,利用预测的声阻抗与孔隙度关系生成另一个回归函数,以预测三维孔隙度属性。机器学习 1D 预测模型能够预测部分或全部缺失的测井资料,如伽马射线、密度、压缩声波、中子孔隙度、声阻抗 (AI) 和孔隙度 (PHIE),以完成储层区 8 口井的全测井资料覆盖。XGBoost 1D 模型的训练结果最好,R^2 得分为 0.93,验证得分为 0.87。随机反演方法能够在三维模型中生成高分辨率声阻抗和孔隙度属性。三维预测模型建立了地震属性体积与井位测井记录(AI)之间的关系,并预测了远离油井的整个三维体积的声阻抗属性。为了评估预测精度,我们采用了随机选择盲井的方法,最优模型的验证精度达到了 82%。值得注意的是,神经网络在靠近油井位置时表现出卓越的性能,而当我们远离油井时,则观察到其质量有所下降。另一方面,随机森林(Random Forest)和 XGBoost 始终能产生连续的结果。将人工智能和孔隙度的预测特性结合起来,训练出一个无监督的神经网络模型,用于岩相预测。这一过程有助于确定与碳氢化合物饱和的最佳储层砂相关的甜点。机器学习预测产生了快速而令人满意的结果,可与传统地震反演输出相媲美,但解释人员的干预最少,并展示了处理大型数据集的能力。所应用的方法可利用各种地震属性生成多个模型,为油井布置和油田开发项目确定最佳的砂储层甜点。这种方法可用于勘探早期阶段,即油井较少的阶段。输出的储层属性可直接纳入三维静态模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unlocking Reservoir Potential: Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Reservoir Properties and Sweet Spots Identification High-Resolution Characterization of Carbonate Source Reservoir Heterogeneity for Enhanced Production Optimization Modeling the Effect of Transient Viscous Forces on Sucker Rod Pump Performance and Run Lift Application of Representative Stochastic Models to Guide Development Decision Making in Large Unconventional Projects with Variable Fluid Composition Predicting Interfacial Tension in CO2/Brine Systems: A Data-Driven Approach and Its Implications for Carbon Geostorage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1