Associations between social anxiety, physiological reactivity, and speech disfluencies in autistic young adults and controls

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106425
Veera Pirinen , Kurt Eggers , Katja Dindar , Terhi Helminen , Aija Kotila , Sanna Kuusikko-Gauffin , Leena Mäkinen , Hanna Ebeling , Tuula Hurtig , Mirjami Mäntymaa , Soile Loukusa
{"title":"Associations between social anxiety, physiological reactivity, and speech disfluencies in autistic young adults and controls","authors":"Veera Pirinen ,&nbsp;Kurt Eggers ,&nbsp;Katja Dindar ,&nbsp;Terhi Helminen ,&nbsp;Aija Kotila ,&nbsp;Sanna Kuusikko-Gauffin ,&nbsp;Leena Mäkinen ,&nbsp;Hanna Ebeling ,&nbsp;Tuula Hurtig ,&nbsp;Mirjami Mäntymaa ,&nbsp;Soile Loukusa","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine possible associations of social anxiety (SA) and speaking-related physiological reactivity with the frequencies of a) total disfluencies, b) typical disfluencies, and c) stuttering-like disfluencies, as well as d) stuttering-severity in autistic young adults and controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-two autistic young adults and 35 controls participated in this study. Participants were presented with video clips (viewing condition) and were then asked to talk about the videos (narrating condition). SA was measured by the self-report <em>Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory</em> (SPAI). Speaking-related physiological reactivity was measured by the electrodermal activity (EDA), an index of emotional arousal. The speech samples from the narrating condition were analyzed for type and frequency of speech disfluencies and used for determining the stuttering severity. SA and speaking-related physiological reactivity were compared between the groups. Correlation between SA, physiological reactivity, disfluency frequencies, and stuttering severity were tested separately for both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No between-group differences were found in the overall SA, yet differences were found in SPAI subscales of social interaction, group interaction, and avoidance, as well as in agoraphobia. Both groups had higher physiological arousal in narrating condition in comparison to the video viewing condition, yet there was no between-group difference in the reactivity. No associations were found between SPAI measures, physiological reactivity, disfluency frequencies, and stuttering severity in the autistic group. In the control group, a negative association was found between physiological reactivity and total and typical disfluency frequencies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SA or speaking-related physiological reactivity were not associated with disfluency frequencies or stuttering severity in autistic persons. Negative association between physiological reactivity and disfluency frequencies found in the control group may indicate that the physiological arousal may impact the speech production process by reducing the overt disfluencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 106425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992424000212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to examine possible associations of social anxiety (SA) and speaking-related physiological reactivity with the frequencies of a) total disfluencies, b) typical disfluencies, and c) stuttering-like disfluencies, as well as d) stuttering-severity in autistic young adults and controls.

Methods

Thirty-two autistic young adults and 35 controls participated in this study. Participants were presented with video clips (viewing condition) and were then asked to talk about the videos (narrating condition). SA was measured by the self-report Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI). Speaking-related physiological reactivity was measured by the electrodermal activity (EDA), an index of emotional arousal. The speech samples from the narrating condition were analyzed for type and frequency of speech disfluencies and used for determining the stuttering severity. SA and speaking-related physiological reactivity were compared between the groups. Correlation between SA, physiological reactivity, disfluency frequencies, and stuttering severity were tested separately for both groups.

Results

No between-group differences were found in the overall SA, yet differences were found in SPAI subscales of social interaction, group interaction, and avoidance, as well as in agoraphobia. Both groups had higher physiological arousal in narrating condition in comparison to the video viewing condition, yet there was no between-group difference in the reactivity. No associations were found between SPAI measures, physiological reactivity, disfluency frequencies, and stuttering severity in the autistic group. In the control group, a negative association was found between physiological reactivity and total and typical disfluency frequencies.

Conclusions

SA or speaking-related physiological reactivity were not associated with disfluency frequencies or stuttering severity in autistic persons. Negative association between physiological reactivity and disfluency frequencies found in the control group may indicate that the physiological arousal may impact the speech production process by reducing the overt disfluencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症青少年与对照组在社交焦虑、生理反应和言语不流畅之间的关系
简介:本研究旨在探讨社交焦虑(SA)和与说话相关的生理反应与自闭症青少年和对照组中 a) 总口吃、b) 典型口吃、c) 口吃样口吃以及 d) 口吃严重程度的频率之间可能存在的关联。研究人员向受试者播放视频短片(观看条件),然后要求受试者讲述视频内容(讲述条件)。自闭症通过自我报告社交恐惧症和焦虑量表(SPAI)进行测量。与说话相关的生理反应性通过皮电活动(EDA)进行测量,这是一种情绪唤醒指数。对叙述状态下的言语样本进行分析,以确定言语不流畅的类型和频率,并用于确定口吃的严重程度。对各组之间的口吃症状和与说话相关的生理反应进行了比较。结果 在总体口吃症状方面没有发现组间差异,但在社会交往、群体交往和回避等 SPAI 子量表以及广场恐惧症方面发现了差异。与观看视频的条件相比,两组受试者在叙述条件下的生理唤醒程度都更高,但在反应性方面却没有组间差异。在自闭症组中,SPAI测量值、生理反应性、不流利频率和口吃严重程度之间没有关联。在对照组中,生理反应与总的和典型的口吃频率之间呈负相关。在对照组中发现的生理反应与口吃频率之间的负相关可能表明,生理唤醒可能会通过减少明显的口吃来影响言语生成过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic assessment of word learning as a predictor of response to vocabulary intervention Editorial Board Shifting from a female-dominated profession: The perceptions and experiences of male students in communication sciences and disorders Cognitive processing biases of social anxiety in adults who do and do not stutter Linguistic factors associated with stuttering-like disfluencies in Japanese preschool and school-aged children who stutter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1