Artistic referencing and emergent standards of peer recognition in Hollywood, 1930–2000

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101887
Katharina Burgdorf
{"title":"Artistic referencing and emergent standards of peer recognition in Hollywood, 1930–2000","authors":"Katharina Burgdorf","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How does an artwork's referencing of creative content affect its peer recognition? Artists constantly seek to balance the tension between originality and conformity. Previous research argues that peers tend to reward socially well-embedded artists that signal community involvement and literacy of established conventions. Another stream of sociological research argues that the criteria for peer recognition are not fixed but depend on a cultural field's legitimacy. This paper examines the emerging and shifting standards of peer recognition throughout 70 years in U.S. American filmmaking. I ask whether and to what extent a film's referencing of artistic content from earlier films, such as snippets of dialog or camera shots, conditions its chances of being referenced. I analyze reference styles of 5,555 U.S. American movies released between 1930 and 1995 and show how artistic standards emerged during the New Hollywood movement in the 1960s. While films of the New Hollywood (1960–1979) and Blockbuster Era (1980–1995) were rewarded for signaling cultural literacy and openness in their reference styles, these standards did not apply yet to Golden Age filmmakers (1930–1959). These findings offer new insights for sociologists of culture and organizations who ask how an artwork's embeddedness into the cultural space affects its recognition by contemporary peer audiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 101887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X24000263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does an artwork's referencing of creative content affect its peer recognition? Artists constantly seek to balance the tension between originality and conformity. Previous research argues that peers tend to reward socially well-embedded artists that signal community involvement and literacy of established conventions. Another stream of sociological research argues that the criteria for peer recognition are not fixed but depend on a cultural field's legitimacy. This paper examines the emerging and shifting standards of peer recognition throughout 70 years in U.S. American filmmaking. I ask whether and to what extent a film's referencing of artistic content from earlier films, such as snippets of dialog or camera shots, conditions its chances of being referenced. I analyze reference styles of 5,555 U.S. American movies released between 1930 and 1995 and show how artistic standards emerged during the New Hollywood movement in the 1960s. While films of the New Hollywood (1960–1979) and Blockbuster Era (1980–1995) were rewarded for signaling cultural literacy and openness in their reference styles, these standards did not apply yet to Golden Age filmmakers (1930–1959). These findings offer new insights for sociologists of culture and organizations who ask how an artwork's embeddedness into the cultural space affects its recognition by contemporary peer audiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1930-2000 年好莱坞的艺术参考和新出现的同行认可标准
艺术品对创作内容的引用如何影响其同行认可度?艺术家们一直在努力平衡原创性与一致性之间的矛盾。以往的研究认为,同行倾向于奖励那些具有良好社会根基的艺术家,因为他们标志着对社区的参与和对既定惯例的了解。另一种社会学研究则认为,同行认可的标准并不固定,而是取决于文化领域的合法性。本文探讨了美国美国电影制作 70 年间新出现的和不断变化的同行认可标准。我的问题是,一部电影是否以及在多大程度上参考了早期电影的艺术内容,如对话片段或摄影镜头,这是否会影响其被参考的机会。我分析了 1930 年至 1995 年间上映的 5,555 部美国电影的借鉴风格,并展示了艺术标准是如何在 20 世纪 60 年代的新好莱坞运动中出现的。虽然新好莱坞(1960-1979 年)和大片时代(1980-1995 年)的电影因其参考风格中体现出的文化素养和开放性而受到奖励,但这些标准还不适用于黄金时代(1930-1959 年)的电影制作人。这些研究结果为文化和组织社会学家提供了新的见解,他们会问,艺术作品在文化空间中的嵌入程度如何影响当代同行观众对其的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
Reconfiguring “Heritage hip-hop” From the scenes: Rightful youth rebellion and localised authenticity in the Huxiang Flow The role of hope and fear in the impact of climate fiction on climate action intentions: Evidence from India and USA Divergences and convergences across European musical preferences: How taste varies within and between countries Designed for success or failure: Differences in funding and rejection in the space of applications to the Danish Art Foundation among craftsmen and designers Mapping knowledge: Topic analysis of science locates researchers in disciplinary landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1