Streaming for good: Streamer-viewer interaction, beneficiary focus, and donation progress

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1002/nvsm.1849
Shaojung Sharon Wang
{"title":"Streaming for good: Streamer-viewer interaction, beneficiary focus, and donation progress","authors":"Shaojung Sharon Wang","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.1849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores how perceived viewer–streamer interactions elicit various types of social support in charity streaming, based on parasocial interaction (PSI). It further integrates accountability and goal-setting theories to address the question of how the different types of beneficiary focus and levels of donation progress that are usually embedded in charity streaming settings harness PSI's effects to increase donations. Experiment 1 (<i>N</i> = 100) showed that high PSI (vs. low) contributed to higher intentions from viewers to provide emotional and financial support to the streamers. Experiment 2 (<i>N</i> = 241) demonstrated that viewers who experienced high PSI (vs. low) were more likely to purchase product and donate to the charity that benefits human (vs. animal and environment). Experiment 3 (<i>N</i> = 315) found that high PSI (vs. low) and donation progress close (vs. far) to the goal were more likely to evoke donation to the human (vs. environment)-focused charity. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how perceived viewer–streamer interactions elicit various types of social support in charity streaming, based on parasocial interaction (PSI). It further integrates accountability and goal-setting theories to address the question of how the different types of beneficiary focus and levels of donation progress that are usually embedded in charity streaming settings harness PSI's effects to increase donations. Experiment 1 (N = 100) showed that high PSI (vs. low) contributed to higher intentions from viewers to provide emotional and financial support to the streamers. Experiment 2 (N = 241) demonstrated that viewers who experienced high PSI (vs. low) were more likely to purchase product and donate to the charity that benefits human (vs. animal and environment). Experiment 3 (N = 315) found that high PSI (vs. low) and donation progress close (vs. far) to the goal were more likely to evoke donation to the human (vs. environment)-focused charity. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流媒体为善:流媒体与观众的互动、受益人的关注点和捐赠进度
本研究以寄生社会互动(PSI)为基础,探讨了在慈善流媒体中,观众与流媒体的互动如何引发各种类型的社会支持。研究进一步结合了责任和目标设定理论,以解决慈善流媒体环境中通常包含的不同类型的受益人关注点和捐赠进展水平如何利用 PSI 的效应来增加捐赠的问题。实验 1(N = 100)表明,高 PSI(与低 PSI 相比)有助于提高观众向流媒体提供情感和经济支持的意愿。实验 2(N = 241)表明,体验过高 PSI(与低 PSI 相比)的观众更有可能购买产品并向造福人类(与造福动物和环境相比)的慈善机构捐款。实验 3(N = 315)发现,高 PSI(相对于低 PSI)和捐赠进度接近(相对于远离)目标更有可能唤起人们向以人类(相对于环境)为重点的慈善机构捐赠。本文还讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Corporate Artification to Artification in the Third Sector The Stepwise Artification Process in Luxury Fashion: Strategic Integration With the Arts and Collaboration With Non-Profit Institutions Evolution of the “Hierarchy of Engagement” Model Over a Decade: Examining Social Media Use to Inform, Activate, and Create Community Issue Information Going Beyond Philanthropy: A Dual Process Approach to Examine How Consumers Punish Brand Misanthropy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1