Efficacy and safety of bexagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin as an adjunct to metformin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-04-07 DOI:10.1111/1753-0407.13526
Lingding Xie, Jie Han, Zhifeng Cheng, Dexue Liu, Jie Liu, Chunrong Xu, Wenli Sun, Qingju Li, Fang Bian, Wei Zhang, Jinyu Chen, Qian Zhu, Tara K. Thurber, J. Paul Lock, Bo Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of bexagliflozin compared with dapagliflozin as an adjunct to metformin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial","authors":"Lingding Xie,&nbsp;Jie Han,&nbsp;Zhifeng Cheng,&nbsp;Dexue Liu,&nbsp;Jie Liu,&nbsp;Chunrong Xu,&nbsp;Wenli Sun,&nbsp;Qingju Li,&nbsp;Fang Bian,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Jinyu Chen,&nbsp;Qian Zhu,&nbsp;Tara K. Thurber,&nbsp;J. Paul Lock,&nbsp;Bo Zhang","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.13526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Bexagliflozin and dapagliflozin are sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. No direct comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in a randomized controlled trial has been reported to date.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial comparing bexagliflozin to dapagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults with disease inadequately controlled by metformin. Subjects (<i>n</i> = 406) were randomized to receive bexagliflozin (20 mg) or dapagliflozin (10 mg) plus metformin. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of bexagliflozin to dapagliflozin for the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included intergroup differences in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h-postprandial glucose (PPG), body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to week 24. The trial also evaluated the safety profiles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The model-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 24 HbA1c was −1.08% for bexagliflozin and −1.10% for dapagliflozin. The intergroup difference of 0.03% (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.14% to 0.19%) was below the prespecified margin of 0.4%, confirming the noninferiority of bexagliflozin. The changes from baseline in FPG, PPG, body weight, and SBP were −1.95 mmol/L, −3.24 mmol/L, −2.52 kg, and −6.4 mm Hg in the bexagliflozin arm and −1.87 mmol/L, −3.07 mmol/L, −2.22 kg, and −6.3 mm Hg in the dapagliflozin arm. Adverse events were experienced in 62.6% and 65.0% and serious adverse events affected 4.4% and 3.5% of subjects in the bexagliflozin and dapagliflozin arm, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Bexagliflozin showed nearly identical effects and a similar safety profile to dapagliflozin when used in Chinese patients on metformin.</p>\n \n <div>\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.13526","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-0407.13526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bexagliflozin and dapagliflozin are sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. No direct comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors in a randomized controlled trial has been reported to date.

Methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial comparing bexagliflozin to dapagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults with disease inadequately controlled by metformin. Subjects (n = 406) were randomized to receive bexagliflozin (20 mg) or dapagliflozin (10 mg) plus metformin. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of bexagliflozin to dapagliflozin for the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included intergroup differences in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h-postprandial glucose (PPG), body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to week 24. The trial also evaluated the safety profiles.

Results

The model-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 24 HbA1c was −1.08% for bexagliflozin and −1.10% for dapagliflozin. The intergroup difference of 0.03% (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.14% to 0.19%) was below the prespecified margin of 0.4%, confirming the noninferiority of bexagliflozin. The changes from baseline in FPG, PPG, body weight, and SBP were −1.95 mmol/L, −3.24 mmol/L, −2.52 kg, and −6.4 mm Hg in the bexagliflozin arm and −1.87 mmol/L, −3.07 mmol/L, −2.22 kg, and −6.3 mm Hg in the dapagliflozin arm. Adverse events were experienced in 62.6% and 65.0% and serious adverse events affected 4.4% and 3.5% of subjects in the bexagliflozin and dapagliflozin arm, respectively.

Conclusions

Bexagliflozin showed nearly identical effects and a similar safety profile to dapagliflozin when used in Chinese patients on metformin.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝沙格列净与达帕格列净作为二甲双胍的辅助药物在中国2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项为期24周的随机、双盲、主动对照3期试验
背景 Bexagliflozin 和 dapagliflozin 是钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2(SGLT2)抑制剂。迄今为止,还没有在随机对照试验中对 SGLT2 抑制剂进行直接比较的报道。 方法 这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、主动对照试验,比较贝沙格列净和达帕格列净治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的成人 2 型糖尿病。受试者(n = 406)被随机分配接受贝沙格列净(20 毫克)或达帕格列净(10 毫克)加二甲双胍治疗。主要研究终点是,就糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从基线到第24周的变化而言,贝沙格列净的非劣效性优于达帕格列净。次要终点包括从基线到第24周空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)、餐后2小时血糖(PPG)、体重和收缩压(SBP)的组间差异。试验还对安全性进行了评估。 结果 经模型调整后,从基线到第24周,贝沙格列净的HbA1c平均变化率为-1.08%,达帕格列净为-1.10%。组间差异为0.03%(95% 置信区间 [CI] -0.14%至0.19%),低于0.4%的预设差值,证实了贝沙格列净的非劣效性。贝沙格列净治疗组的FPG、PPG、体重和SBP与基线相比的变化分别为-1.95毫摩尔/升、-3.24毫摩尔/升、-2.52千克和-6.4毫米汞柱;达帕格列净治疗组的FPG、PPG、体重和SBP与基线相比的变化分别为-1.87毫摩尔/升、-3.07毫摩尔/升、-2.22千克和-6.3毫米汞柱。贝沙格列净治疗组和达帕格列净治疗组分别有62.6%和65.0%的受试者出现不良事件,严重不良事件的发生率分别为4.4%和3.5%。 结论 贝沙格列净用于服用二甲双胍的中国患者时,与达帕格列净显示出几乎相同的效果和相似的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes
Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes (JDB) devotes itself to diabetes research, therapeutics, and education. It aims to involve researchers and practitioners in a dialogue between East and West via all aspects of epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes, including the molecular, biochemical, and physiological aspects of diabetes. The Editorial team is international with a unique mix of Asian and Western participation. The Editors welcome submissions in form of original research articles, images, novel case reports and correspondence, and will solicit reviews, point-counterpoint, commentaries, editorials, news highlights, and educational content.
期刊最新文献
Long noncoding RNAs and metabolic memory associated with continued progression of diabetic retinopathy Structural and functional alterations of the hippocampal subfields in T2DM with mild cognitive impairment and insulin resistance: A prospective study Subcellular mass spectrometric detection unveils hyperglycemic memory in the diabetic heart Associations of maternal serum ferritin levels across gestation with gestational diabetes mellitus: A longitudinal cohort study Clinical characteristics, treatment, and treatment switch after molecular-genetic classification in individuals with maturity-onset diabetes of the young: Insights from the multicenter real-world DPV registry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1