首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Diabetes最新文献

英文 中文
Comparative Analysis of AI Tools for Disseminating ADA 2025 Diabetes Care Standards: Implications for Cardiovascular Physicians
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70072
Tengfei Zheng
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly used in clinical practice, including medical education and the dissemination of updated clinical guidelines. In this study, we evaluated four AI tools—ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-o1, ChatGPT-o3Mini, and DeepSeek—to assess their ability to summarize the <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025</i> from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for cardiovascular physicians in primary care settings [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Using a standardized prompt, we compared the AI-generated summaries across 10 key metrics, including accuracy (alignment with ADA 2025 guidelines), completeness (inclusion of core topics such as glycemic targets, blood pressure management, lipid control, and pharmacologic strategies), clarity (readability and conciseness for cardiovascular physicians), clinical relevance (utility for real-world cardiovascular practice), consistency (logical coherence and uniformity in recommendations), evidence support (reference to supporting studies and ADA standards), ethics (neutral and evidence-based recommendations), timeliness (inclusion of the latest ADA updates), actionability (practical guidance for cardiovascular physicians), and fluency (professional language and structure). Each AI tool was rated on a 0–5 scale for each category, yielding a total possible score of 50 points. All summaries were anonymized to remove identifiers. Each model (ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-o1, ChatGPT-o3Mini, and DeepSeek) was then tasked with evaluating all four anonymized summaries, including its own output, using the predefined 10 metrics. For each model, the four scores assigned by the evaluators (including self-evaluation) were averaged to calculate the final score per metric.</p><p>Our evaluation showed that ChatGPT-o1 performed best (48.3/50), excelling in completeness (5.0), clinical relevance (5.0), and actionability (5.0), with comprehensive coverage of diabetes screening, cardiovascular risk assessment, hypertension/lipid management, and multidisciplinary collaboration (Table 1). However, its evidence support (4.0) required improvement. ChatGPT-4o (45.5/50) demonstrated strengths in clarity (4.8) and structure but had limitations in timeliness (4.5) and evidence support (3.3), as it failed to incorporate 2025 guideline updates and lacked specific research references. The free models, O3Mini (47.3/50) and DeepSeek (47.3/50), performed comparably to paid tools. O3Mini excelled in consistency (5.0) and CKD/heart failure monitoring, while DeepSeek prioritized concise cardiovascular risk management (clarity: 5.0). Both free models, however, scored lower in completeness (O3Mini: 4.8; DeepSeek: 4.5) and evidence support (O3Mini: 4.0; DeepSeek: 3.8), reflecting insufficient integration of 2025 updates and trial data (Table 1).</p><p>Among the most critical takeaways for cardiovascular physicians were the importance of individualized glycemic targets, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists for cardiovascu
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of AI Tools for Disseminating ADA 2025 Diabetes Care Standards: Implications for Cardiovascular Physicians","authors":"Tengfei Zheng","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70072","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly used in clinical practice, including medical education and the dissemination of updated clinical guidelines. In this study, we evaluated four AI tools—ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-o1, ChatGPT-o3Mini, and DeepSeek—to assess their ability to summarize the &lt;i&gt;Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025&lt;/i&gt; from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for cardiovascular physicians in primary care settings [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using a standardized prompt, we compared the AI-generated summaries across 10 key metrics, including accuracy (alignment with ADA 2025 guidelines), completeness (inclusion of core topics such as glycemic targets, blood pressure management, lipid control, and pharmacologic strategies), clarity (readability and conciseness for cardiovascular physicians), clinical relevance (utility for real-world cardiovascular practice), consistency (logical coherence and uniformity in recommendations), evidence support (reference to supporting studies and ADA standards), ethics (neutral and evidence-based recommendations), timeliness (inclusion of the latest ADA updates), actionability (practical guidance for cardiovascular physicians), and fluency (professional language and structure). Each AI tool was rated on a 0–5 scale for each category, yielding a total possible score of 50 points. All summaries were anonymized to remove identifiers. Each model (ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-o1, ChatGPT-o3Mini, and DeepSeek) was then tasked with evaluating all four anonymized summaries, including its own output, using the predefined 10 metrics. For each model, the four scores assigned by the evaluators (including self-evaluation) were averaged to calculate the final score per metric.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our evaluation showed that ChatGPT-o1 performed best (48.3/50), excelling in completeness (5.0), clinical relevance (5.0), and actionability (5.0), with comprehensive coverage of diabetes screening, cardiovascular risk assessment, hypertension/lipid management, and multidisciplinary collaboration (Table 1). However, its evidence support (4.0) required improvement. ChatGPT-4o (45.5/50) demonstrated strengths in clarity (4.8) and structure but had limitations in timeliness (4.5) and evidence support (3.3), as it failed to incorporate 2025 guideline updates and lacked specific research references. The free models, O3Mini (47.3/50) and DeepSeek (47.3/50), performed comparably to paid tools. O3Mini excelled in consistency (5.0) and CKD/heart failure monitoring, while DeepSeek prioritized concise cardiovascular risk management (clarity: 5.0). Both free models, however, scored lower in completeness (O3Mini: 4.8; DeepSeek: 4.5) and evidence support (O3Mini: 4.0; DeepSeek: 3.8), reflecting insufficient integration of 2025 updates and trial data (Table 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Among the most critical takeaways for cardiovascular physicians were the importance of individualized glycemic targets, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists for cardiovascu","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70072","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Glycaemia Risk Index With Indices of Atherosclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70065
Keiichi Torimoto, Yosuke Okada, Tomoya Mita, Kenichi Tanaka, Fumiya Sato, Naoto Katakami, Hidenori Yoshii, Keiko Nishida, Yoshiya Tanaka, Ryota Ishii, Masahiko Gosho, Iichiro Shimomura, Hirotaka Watada

Aims

This study determined the association of the glycaemia risk index (GRI), a novel comprehensive metric derived from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

We evaluated the relationship between GRI and intima-media thickness (IMT), gray-scale median (GSM), tissue characteristics of the carotid artery wall, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), using baseline data from a multicenter prospective cohort study of 1000 Japanese patients with T2DM free of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Results

The study subjects were 999 patients (age: 64.6 ± 9.6 years, mean ± SD, 60.9% males, body mass index: 24.6 ± 3.9 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.1% ± 0.8%, TIR 78.9% ± 18.6%) with T2DM (duration of 12.9 ± 8.5 years). A higher GRI was associated with a longer duration of diabetes, a higher HbA1c level, a mean glucose level, and baPWV, and lower mean GSM. No association was noted between GRI and mean IMT. GRI was significantly associated with mean GSM (regression coefficient, β = −0.1277; 95% confidence interval: CI: −0.2165 to −0.0390, p = 0.005) and baPWV (regression coefficient, β = −3.1568; 95% CI: 1.5058 to 4.8079, p < 0.001) after adjustment for various cardiovascular risk factors.

Conclusions

GRI is a potentially useful predictor of atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM. Our findings suggest that GRI, a marker of the risk of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, may serve as a clinically useful tool for the assessment of the risk of CVD in patients with T2DM, independent of the classical cardiovascular risk factors.

{"title":"Association of Glycaemia Risk Index With Indices of Atherosclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Keiichi Torimoto,&nbsp;Yosuke Okada,&nbsp;Tomoya Mita,&nbsp;Kenichi Tanaka,&nbsp;Fumiya Sato,&nbsp;Naoto Katakami,&nbsp;Hidenori Yoshii,&nbsp;Keiko Nishida,&nbsp;Yoshiya Tanaka,&nbsp;Ryota Ishii,&nbsp;Masahiko Gosho,&nbsp;Iichiro Shimomura,&nbsp;Hirotaka Watada","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aims</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study determined the association of the glycaemia risk index (GRI), a novel comprehensive metric derived from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We evaluated the relationship between GRI and intima-media thickness (IMT), gray-scale median (GSM), tissue characteristics of the carotid artery wall, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), using baseline data from a multicenter prospective cohort study of 1000 Japanese patients with T2DM free of cardiovascular disease (CVD).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study subjects were 999 patients (age: 64.6 ± 9.6 years, mean ± SD, 60.9% males, body mass index: 24.6 ± 3.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, HbA1c 7.1% ± 0.8%, TIR 78.9% ± 18.6%) with T2DM (duration of 12.9 ± 8.5 years). A higher GRI was associated with a longer duration of diabetes, a higher HbA1c level, a mean glucose level, and baPWV, and lower mean GSM. No association was noted between GRI and mean IMT. GRI was significantly associated with mean GSM (regression coefficient, <i>β</i> = −0.1277; 95% confidence interval: CI: −0.2165 to −0.0390, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and baPWV (regression coefficient, <i>β</i> = −3.1568; 95% CI: 1.5058 to 4.8079, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) after adjustment for various cardiovascular risk factors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>GRI is a potentially useful predictor of atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM. Our findings suggest that GRI, a marker of the risk of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, may serve as a clinically useful tool for the assessment of the risk of CVD in patients with T2DM, independent of the classical cardiovascular risk factors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70065","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex Differences in the Efficacy of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70063
Yucheng Yang, Liyun He, Shumeng Han, Na Yang, Yiwen Liu, Xuechen Wang, Ziyi Li, Fan Ping, Lingling Xu, Wei Li, Huabing Zhang, Yuxiu Li

Aim

To verify sex differences of GLP-1RAs for weight reduction.

Methods

We searched RCTs reporting weight change by sex from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials registries. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the association between weight reduction and sex differences. Subgroup analyses were stratified by individual GLP-1RA medications, dose, treatment duration, indication, type of control, background treatment, and baseline weight. The study protocol was registered (CRD42023480167).

Results

Fourteen studies covering dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, and retatrutide were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed that females lost more weight than males (MD 1.04 kg [95% CIs 0.70–1.38]; MD 1.69% [95% CI 0.78–2.61]). The pooled results of GLP-1RAs indicated similar results (MD 0.88 kg [95% CIs 0.67–1.09]). Meta-regression illustrated that substantial weight reduction was significantly relevant to greater gender differences (β = −0.19 [95% CIs −0.29 to −0.09]). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that indications for weight reduction increased the gender difference in weight reduction (MD 4.21 kg [95% CIs 1.75–6.67]). Background treatment, dose, duration of treatment, baseline weight, and type of control had no subgroup differences in the sex difference in weight reduction of GLP-1RAs. Dulaglutide (MD 0.88 kg [95% CIs 0.63–1.12]) and semaglutide (MD 1.04 kg [95% CIs 0.45–1.63]) showed statistically significant differences in weight reduction between males and females. No gender difference was observed in the exenatide subgroup analysis.

Conclusions

Females lost more weight than males when treated with GLP-1RAs for weight reduction. The sex difference in weight reduction became more pronounced as the degree of weight reduction increased. Indications for obesity could magnify this sex difference.

{"title":"Sex Differences in the Efficacy of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Yucheng Yang,&nbsp;Liyun He,&nbsp;Shumeng Han,&nbsp;Na Yang,&nbsp;Yiwen Liu,&nbsp;Xuechen Wang,&nbsp;Ziyi Li,&nbsp;Fan Ping,&nbsp;Lingling Xu,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Huabing Zhang,&nbsp;Yuxiu Li","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70063","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To verify sex differences of GLP-1RAs for weight reduction.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched RCTs reporting weight change by sex from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials registries. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the association between weight reduction and sex differences. Subgroup analyses were stratified by individual GLP-1RA medications, dose, treatment duration, indication, type of control, background treatment, and baseline weight. The study protocol was registered (CRD42023480167).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fourteen studies covering dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, and retatrutide were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed that females lost more weight than males (MD 1.04 kg [95% CIs 0.70–1.38]; MD 1.69% [95% CI 0.78–2.61]). The pooled results of GLP-1RAs indicated similar results (MD 0.88 kg [95% CIs 0.67–1.09]). Meta-regression illustrated that substantial weight reduction was significantly relevant to greater gender differences (<i>β</i> = −0.19 [95% CIs −0.29 to −0.09]). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that indications for weight reduction increased the gender difference in weight reduction (MD 4.21 kg [95% CIs 1.75–6.67]). Background treatment, dose, duration of treatment, baseline weight, and type of control had no subgroup differences in the sex difference in weight reduction of GLP-1RAs. Dulaglutide (MD 0.88 kg [95% CIs 0.63–1.12]) and semaglutide (MD 1.04 kg [95% CIs 0.45–1.63]) showed statistically significant differences in weight reduction between males and females. No gender difference was observed in the exenatide subgroup analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Females lost more weight than males when treated with GLP-1RAs for weight reduction. The sex difference in weight reduction became more pronounced as the degree of weight reduction increased. Indications for obesity could magnify this sex difference.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 \u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70063","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143554460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Commentary on “Pedal Medial Arterial Calcification in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Significant Risk Factor of Amputation and Mortality”
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70070
Lihong Chen, Dawei Chen, Hongping Gong, Chun Wang, Yun Gao, Yan Li, Weiwei Tang, Panpan Zha, Xingwu Ran
<p>We appreciate the authors for their insightful commentary and for recognizing our manuscript [<span>1</span>] as a valuable contribution that provides crucial insights into the relationship between pedal MAC, the risk of amputation, and mortality in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).</p><p>We concur that a more sophisticated classification system, such as SINBAD or WIfI systems, could enhance the comprehension of the severity and risk associated with DFUs and improve communication among healthcare professionals. However, considering its simplicity and practicality, the Wagner wound classification system remains internationally recognized and widely utilized.</p><p>Regarding laboratory markers, inflammatory biomarkers including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) exhibit significant variability. Specifically, in patients with diabetic foot infections, these inflammatory markers are markedly elevated. Consequently, they serve as indicators of acute infection but are not suitable for assessing long-term prognosis, such as amputation risk or mortality. Additionally, laboratory markers such as magnesium, zinc, and vitamin B12 are not routinely evaluated in clinical practice. Further research could explore the potential associations between these markers and the prognosis of DFUs.</p><p>Because of the longitudinal nature of the study design, participants were followed up over an extended period. The hypoglycemic medications prescribed may have varied over time, making it challenging to incorporate both the medications and their dosages into the analysis. Regarding infections and antibiotics, diabetic foot infection is indeed a recognized risk factor for amputation and short-term mortality. However, based on our previous meta-analysis, the primary long-term causes of mortality include cardiovascular diseases, infections (such as sepsis, respiratory infections, and foot infections), and cancers [<span>2</span>].</p><p>We acknowledge that patients with DFUs may concurrently suffer from autoimmune disorders, psychiatric conditions, and malignancies. These comorbidities elevate the risk of amputation and adverse outcomes [<span>3</span>]. However, in this study, we excluded individuals with these comorbidities prior to analysis.</p><p>With respect to socioeconomic status and educational attainment, it is well-established that a lower socioeconomic status constitutes a substantial risk factor for amputation among patients with diabetes and peripheral artery disease [<span>4</span>]. Socioeconomic status, social capital, and medical challenges significantly impede the effective management and prevention of DFUs [<span>5</span>]. Enhanced government intervention is imperative to ensure equitable access to health resources. Additionally, a history of ulceration and prior amputations is a critical risk f
{"title":"Response to Commentary on “Pedal Medial Arterial Calcification in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Significant Risk Factor of Amputation and Mortality”","authors":"Lihong Chen,&nbsp;Dawei Chen,&nbsp;Hongping Gong,&nbsp;Chun Wang,&nbsp;Yun Gao,&nbsp;Yan Li,&nbsp;Weiwei Tang,&nbsp;Panpan Zha,&nbsp;Xingwu Ran","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70070","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We appreciate the authors for their insightful commentary and for recognizing our manuscript [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;] as a valuable contribution that provides crucial insights into the relationship between pedal MAC, the risk of amputation, and mortality in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We concur that a more sophisticated classification system, such as SINBAD or WIfI systems, could enhance the comprehension of the severity and risk associated with DFUs and improve communication among healthcare professionals. However, considering its simplicity and practicality, the Wagner wound classification system remains internationally recognized and widely utilized.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding laboratory markers, inflammatory biomarkers including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) exhibit significant variability. Specifically, in patients with diabetic foot infections, these inflammatory markers are markedly elevated. Consequently, they serve as indicators of acute infection but are not suitable for assessing long-term prognosis, such as amputation risk or mortality. Additionally, laboratory markers such as magnesium, zinc, and vitamin B12 are not routinely evaluated in clinical practice. Further research could explore the potential associations between these markers and the prognosis of DFUs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because of the longitudinal nature of the study design, participants were followed up over an extended period. The hypoglycemic medications prescribed may have varied over time, making it challenging to incorporate both the medications and their dosages into the analysis. Regarding infections and antibiotics, diabetic foot infection is indeed a recognized risk factor for amputation and short-term mortality. However, based on our previous meta-analysis, the primary long-term causes of mortality include cardiovascular diseases, infections (such as sepsis, respiratory infections, and foot infections), and cancers [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We acknowledge that patients with DFUs may concurrently suffer from autoimmune disorders, psychiatric conditions, and malignancies. These comorbidities elevate the risk of amputation and adverse outcomes [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. However, in this study, we excluded individuals with these comorbidities prior to analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With respect to socioeconomic status and educational attainment, it is well-established that a lower socioeconomic status constitutes a substantial risk factor for amputation among patients with diabetes and peripheral artery disease [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. Socioeconomic status, social capital, and medical challenges significantly impede the effective management and prevention of DFUs [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Enhanced government intervention is imperative to ensure equitable access to health resources. Additionally, a history of ulceration and prior amputations is a critical risk f","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70070","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143554589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on “Pedal Medial Arterial Calcification in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Significant Risk Factor of Amputation and Mortality”
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70071
Mostafa Javanian, Mohammad Barary, Ali Alizadeh Khatir, Majid Khalilizad, Soheil Ebrahimpour
<p>We were glad to read the article entitled “Pedal Medial Arterial Calcification in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Significant Risk Factor of Amputation and Mortality,” published in your prestigious journal [<span>1</span>]. This sheds light on the yet less known association, made clear by the authors, between pedal, medial arterial calcification (MAC) and its strong relationship with amputation and mortality in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. Not only is pedal MAC a new significant predictor of amputation, but it is also a predictor of amputation independent of peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, we believe that filling in some methodological missing parts could attune the study hypothesis and strengthen the conclusions of the study.</p><p>First and foremost, one of the strengths of the study is the use of a widely recognized classification system for grading DFUs, the Wagner classification system. However, I think the study could have benefited from the inclusion of a more comprehensive ulcer scoring system, which takes into account several factors such as ulcer location, size, depth, ischemia, and neuropathy, such as the SINBAD ulcer classification [<span>2</span>]. This would offer a more comprehensive understanding of severity and risk, particularly for those patients with more complex presentations.</p><p>Another point of consideration is to investigate further the role of additional laboratory markers in supplementing our understanding of the clinical outcomes of the patient population. For instance, biomarkers including magnesium, zinc, vitamin B12, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) could provide a higher level of precision into the underlying mechanisms and may better orient the clinical risk assessment [<span>3, 4</span>].</p><p>The study also fails to thoroughly examine the drugs given to the patients, especially antidiabetic medicines and antibiotics. These treatments can greatly affect how well we heal and whether we have complications like amputation. A detailed breakdown of these medications and their dosages would further shed light on their potential impact on the study's findings.</p><p>Further research may also be strengthened by including additional potential comorbid conditions, including autoimmune disorders, psychiatric disorders, and cancers. It is well established that these factors have significant effects on the course of DFUs and the risk of amputation and mortality. This would give a better representation of the patient population and could potentially increase the predictive power of the model.</p><p>A deeper dive into demographic information like socioeconomic status, education level, alcohol use, and the patient's history of ulcers or amputation would also improve the study. Previous research has shown how much these variables affect health outcomes, how the
{"title":"Commentary on “Pedal Medial Arterial Calcification in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Significant Risk Factor of Amputation and Mortality”","authors":"Mostafa Javanian,&nbsp;Mohammad Barary,&nbsp;Ali Alizadeh Khatir,&nbsp;Majid Khalilizad,&nbsp;Soheil Ebrahimpour","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70071","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We were glad to read the article entitled “Pedal Medial Arterial Calcification in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Significant Risk Factor of Amputation and Mortality,” published in your prestigious journal [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. This sheds light on the yet less known association, made clear by the authors, between pedal, medial arterial calcification (MAC) and its strong relationship with amputation and mortality in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. Not only is pedal MAC a new significant predictor of amputation, but it is also a predictor of amputation independent of peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, we believe that filling in some methodological missing parts could attune the study hypothesis and strengthen the conclusions of the study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First and foremost, one of the strengths of the study is the use of a widely recognized classification system for grading DFUs, the Wagner classification system. However, I think the study could have benefited from the inclusion of a more comprehensive ulcer scoring system, which takes into account several factors such as ulcer location, size, depth, ischemia, and neuropathy, such as the SINBAD ulcer classification [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. This would offer a more comprehensive understanding of severity and risk, particularly for those patients with more complex presentations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another point of consideration is to investigate further the role of additional laboratory markers in supplementing our understanding of the clinical outcomes of the patient population. For instance, biomarkers including magnesium, zinc, vitamin B12, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) could provide a higher level of precision into the underlying mechanisms and may better orient the clinical risk assessment [&lt;span&gt;3, 4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study also fails to thoroughly examine the drugs given to the patients, especially antidiabetic medicines and antibiotics. These treatments can greatly affect how well we heal and whether we have complications like amputation. A detailed breakdown of these medications and their dosages would further shed light on their potential impact on the study's findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further research may also be strengthened by including additional potential comorbid conditions, including autoimmune disorders, psychiatric disorders, and cancers. It is well established that these factors have significant effects on the course of DFUs and the risk of amputation and mortality. This would give a better representation of the patient population and could potentially increase the predictive power of the model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A deeper dive into demographic information like socioeconomic status, education level, alcohol use, and the patient's history of ulcers or amputation would also improve the study. Previous research has shown how much these variables affect health outcomes, how the","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70071","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143554590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to “Comment on Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Malnutrition in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70066
Tong Zhang, Yuxia Ma, Lin Han
<p>We thank the authors for their insightful comments and for recognizing that our manuscript provides valuable contributions to the field of clinical nutrition [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Firstly, we acknowledge that meta-regression can provide additional insights into heterogeneity, but its feasibility and reliability in our study were constrained by the inconsistent and limited reporting of key covariates, such as sample characteristics, across the included studies, and current meta-analysis studies on single-group rates are all highly heterogeneous [<span>2, 3</span>]. Additionally, even meta-regression analysis cannot completely resolve heterogeneity, which is inherent to meta-analysis investigating prevalence rates. Heterogeneity is now widely recognized and accepted as a standard challenge in such studies and is one of the issues to be addressed by future methodologists [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Secondly, using Egger's test and funnel plots to assess publication bias are widely adopted methods, and while tools such as Doi plots and the LFK index may provide alternative methods for detecting publication bias, these methods have not been universally used in meta-analyses. We acknowledge that prediction intervals (PIs) can convey the range of effects expected in future studies, but calculating and interpreting PIs relies on normality assumptions, which may be difficult to guarantee. Importantly, retaining our original analysis methods does not alter the conclusions of this paper, which is why we opted to maintain them.</p><p>Thirdly, regarding malnutrition assessment tools, we note that a meta-analysis of 83 studies identified more than 30 nutritional assessment tools, none of which are universally applicable or specifically developed for diabetic patients [<span>5</span>]. We recognize that pooling results from diverse tools introduces significant heterogeneity, but limiting analysis to stratified results would constrain the exploration of factors influencing malnutrition in diabetic patients. To address this, we performed subgroup analysis based on assessment tools. Furthermore, we also advocate for the development of a standardized malnutrition assessment tool tailored for diabetic patients to enhance consistency and comparability across studies.</p><p>Finally, we agree that the analysis of some influencing factors, such as smoking, education level, and diabetic foot infection, was limited by small sample sizes. Future studies should focus more on the impact of these factors on the nutritional status of diabetic patients. Additionally, future analysis should aim to incorporate confounding variables, including socioeconomic status, dietary patterns, and psychological factors, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of malnutrition risk.</p><p>In conclusion, we thank the authors for their comments on the manuscript and for providing valuable insights. We hope these clarifications address the issues raised and further illuminate our analytica
{"title":"Response to “Comment on Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Malnutrition in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”","authors":"Tong Zhang,&nbsp;Yuxia Ma,&nbsp;Lin Han","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70066","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We thank the authors for their insightful comments and for recognizing that our manuscript provides valuable contributions to the field of clinical nutrition [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Firstly, we acknowledge that meta-regression can provide additional insights into heterogeneity, but its feasibility and reliability in our study were constrained by the inconsistent and limited reporting of key covariates, such as sample characteristics, across the included studies, and current meta-analysis studies on single-group rates are all highly heterogeneous [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. Additionally, even meta-regression analysis cannot completely resolve heterogeneity, which is inherent to meta-analysis investigating prevalence rates. Heterogeneity is now widely recognized and accepted as a standard challenge in such studies and is one of the issues to be addressed by future methodologists [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Secondly, using Egger's test and funnel plots to assess publication bias are widely adopted methods, and while tools such as Doi plots and the LFK index may provide alternative methods for detecting publication bias, these methods have not been universally used in meta-analyses. We acknowledge that prediction intervals (PIs) can convey the range of effects expected in future studies, but calculating and interpreting PIs relies on normality assumptions, which may be difficult to guarantee. Importantly, retaining our original analysis methods does not alter the conclusions of this paper, which is why we opted to maintain them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thirdly, regarding malnutrition assessment tools, we note that a meta-analysis of 83 studies identified more than 30 nutritional assessment tools, none of which are universally applicable or specifically developed for diabetic patients [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. We recognize that pooling results from diverse tools introduces significant heterogeneity, but limiting analysis to stratified results would constrain the exploration of factors influencing malnutrition in diabetic patients. To address this, we performed subgroup analysis based on assessment tools. Furthermore, we also advocate for the development of a standardized malnutrition assessment tool tailored for diabetic patients to enhance consistency and comparability across studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, we agree that the analysis of some influencing factors, such as smoking, education level, and diabetic foot infection, was limited by small sample sizes. Future studies should focus more on the impact of these factors on the nutritional status of diabetic patients. Additionally, future analysis should aim to incorporate confounding variables, including socioeconomic status, dietary patterns, and psychological factors, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of malnutrition risk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In conclusion, we thank the authors for their comments on the manuscript and for providing valuable insights. We hope these clarifications address the issues raised and further illuminate our analytica","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70066","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: “Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Malnutrition in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70067
Shubham Kumar, Nosaibah Razaqi, Rachana Mehta, Ranjana Sah
<p>We read with great interest the recent article by Zhang et al., titled “Prevalence and influencing factors of malnutrition in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [<span>1</span>]. The study provides valuable insights into an important area of clinical nutrition. The authors should be commended for their effort in consolidating data on malnutrition in diabetic patients and highlighting its associated risk factors. However, upon a detailed review of the article, several methodological issues and potential areas for improvement were identified, which could enhance the reliability and clinical applicability of their findings.</p><p>One significant limitation lies in the presence of substantial heterogeneity across the included studies, as evidenced by high <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> values (> 90%). The heterogeneity raises concerns regarding the comparability of pooled prevalence estimates for malnutrition and at-risk malnutrition, which the authors reported as 33% and 44%, respectively. Although the authors performed subgroup analyses by measurement tools, region, and diabetes complications, these analyses did not fully address the underlying causes of variability. The authors could have considered using meta-regression analysis to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, such as differences in study design, sample characteristics, and diagnostic criteria [<span>2</span>]. This statistical approach would have provided a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity and potentially improved the robustness of their conclusions.</p><p>Additionally, the authors relied on confidence intervals (CIs) to present pooled estimates but did not include prediction intervals (PIs). While CIs describe the precision of the pooled effect size, PIs would have conveyed the range of effects expected in future studies. The use of PIs is especially critical in the presence of high heterogeneity, as it offers a clearer picture of the variability across different settings and populations [<span>3</span>]. The inclusion of PIs alongside CIs would have strengthened the interpretation of the meta-analysis results, particularly for clinical decision-making.</p><p>Another important methodological concern involves the assessment of publication bias. The authors used Egger's test and visual inspection of funnel plots to evaluate publication bias. While these methods are widely used, they may not be optimal for meta-analyses involving proportions, where asymmetry in funnel plots can arise from true heterogeneity rather than bias. The authors might have instead employed more appropriate approaches, such as the Doi plot and LFK index, which are specifically designed to assess publication bias in proportion meta-analyses [<span>4</span>]. These methods offer greater reliability in detecting bias in prevalence studies and could have provided additional assurance regarding the integrity of the findings.</p><p>The use of diverse diagnostic tools, such as the Mini Nu
{"title":"Comment on: “Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Malnutrition in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”","authors":"Shubham Kumar,&nbsp;Nosaibah Razaqi,&nbsp;Rachana Mehta,&nbsp;Ranjana Sah","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70067","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We read with great interest the recent article by Zhang et al., titled “Prevalence and influencing factors of malnutrition in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. The study provides valuable insights into an important area of clinical nutrition. The authors should be commended for their effort in consolidating data on malnutrition in diabetic patients and highlighting its associated risk factors. However, upon a detailed review of the article, several methodological issues and potential areas for improvement were identified, which could enhance the reliability and clinical applicability of their findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One significant limitation lies in the presence of substantial heterogeneity across the included studies, as evidenced by high &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; values (&gt; 90%). The heterogeneity raises concerns regarding the comparability of pooled prevalence estimates for malnutrition and at-risk malnutrition, which the authors reported as 33% and 44%, respectively. Although the authors performed subgroup analyses by measurement tools, region, and diabetes complications, these analyses did not fully address the underlying causes of variability. The authors could have considered using meta-regression analysis to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, such as differences in study design, sample characteristics, and diagnostic criteria [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. This statistical approach would have provided a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity and potentially improved the robustness of their conclusions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Additionally, the authors relied on confidence intervals (CIs) to present pooled estimates but did not include prediction intervals (PIs). While CIs describe the precision of the pooled effect size, PIs would have conveyed the range of effects expected in future studies. The use of PIs is especially critical in the presence of high heterogeneity, as it offers a clearer picture of the variability across different settings and populations [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. The inclusion of PIs alongside CIs would have strengthened the interpretation of the meta-analysis results, particularly for clinical decision-making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another important methodological concern involves the assessment of publication bias. The authors used Egger's test and visual inspection of funnel plots to evaluate publication bias. While these methods are widely used, they may not be optimal for meta-analyses involving proportions, where asymmetry in funnel plots can arise from true heterogeneity rather than bias. The authors might have instead employed more appropriate approaches, such as the Doi plot and LFK index, which are specifically designed to assess publication bias in proportion meta-analyses [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. These methods offer greater reliability in detecting bias in prevalence studies and could have provided additional assurance regarding the integrity of the findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The use of diverse diagnostic tools, such as the Mini Nu","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetically Predicted Frailty Index Is Associated With Increased Risk of Multiple Metabolic Diseases: 175 226 European Participants in a Mendelian Randomization Study
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70062
Hexing Wang, Haifeng Zhang, Dongliang Tang, Yinshuang Yao, Junlan Qiu, Xiaochen Shu

Background

A relationship between frailty index (FI) and metabolic diseases (MDs) has been reported in previous observational studies. However, the causality between them remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the causal effect of FI on MDs.

Methods

We performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. A recent large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) provided available data associated with FI, and summary statistics on eight MDs were collected from the IEU OpenGWAS database. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) was used as the main analysis to estimate causal effects, together with MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), MR-Egger, Cochran's Q test, pleiotropy test, leave-one-out method, and MR Steiger analysis were used in the sensitivity analyses.

Results

Our MR study demonstrated for the first time that elevated FI was causally associated with an increased risk of MDs including obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–2.70; p = 0.0075), T2DM (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.24–2.24; p = 6.95 × 10−4), gout (OR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.29–4.64; p = 0.006), hypothyroidism (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.47–2.60; p = 3.47 × 10−6), and HTN (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.72–2.74; p = 5.25 × 10−11). However, no causal association was found between FI and osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, and hyperthyroidism.

Conclusions

Our findings support a causal relationship between FI and multiple MDs. This is crucial for the prevention of associated MDs in patients with frailty.

{"title":"Genetically Predicted Frailty Index Is Associated With Increased Risk of Multiple Metabolic Diseases: 175 226 European Participants in a Mendelian Randomization Study","authors":"Hexing Wang,&nbsp;Haifeng Zhang,&nbsp;Dongliang Tang,&nbsp;Yinshuang Yao,&nbsp;Junlan Qiu,&nbsp;Xiaochen Shu","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70062","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A relationship between frailty index (FI) and metabolic diseases (MDs) has been reported in previous observational studies. However, the causality between them remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the causal effect of FI on MDs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. A recent large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) provided available data associated with FI, and summary statistics on eight MDs were collected from the IEU OpenGWAS database. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) was used as the main analysis to estimate causal effects, together with MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), MR-Egger, Cochran's Q test, pleiotropy test, leave-one-out method, and MR Steiger analysis were used in the sensitivity analyses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our MR study demonstrated for the first time that elevated FI was causally associated with an increased risk of MDs including obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–2.70; <i>p</i> = 0.0075), T2DM (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.24–2.24; <i>p</i> = 6.95 × 10<sup>−4</sup>), gout (OR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.29–4.64; <i>p</i> = 0.006), hypothyroidism (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.47–2.60; <i>p</i> = 3.47 × 10<sup>−6</sup>), and HTN (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.72–2.74; <i>p</i> = 5.25 × 10<sup>−11</sup>). However, no causal association was found between FI and osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, and hyperthyroidism.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our findings support a causal relationship between FI and multiple MDs. This is crucial for the prevention of associated MDs in patients with frailty.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70062","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association Between Skin Autofluorescence and Coronary Heart Disease in Chinese General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70061
Qingzheng Wu, Yu Cheng, Hongyan Liu, Yuepeng Wang, Bing Li, Yiming Mu

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between SAF and CHD in the general population of China and to assess the feasibility of SAF used as a predictor of CHD.

Methods

This study was nested within the prospective study REACTION (Cancer Risk Assessment in Chinese Diabetic Population) which included a total of 5806 eligible participants from two communities located in urban Beijing in 2018. SAF were measured using a fluorescence detector (DM Scan). CHD was the study endpoint and was determined by a face-to-face clinical survey. Pearson's correlation analysis, linear regression analysis, and binary logistic regression analysis were used to examine the association between SAF and CHD.

Results

The overall prevalence of CHD in the general population was 12.1%. Logistic analysis showed that after full adjustment for confounding factors, the risk of CHD increased significantly with increasing lnSAF quartiles (p-trend < 0.05). Compared to Q1 group, the multivariate adjusted ORs of Q2 and Q3 groups were 1.071 (0.817, 1.404), 1.025 (0.781, 1.344), respectively, and the OR was markedly increased at Q4 (OR = 1.377 [1.043, 1.817]). When lnSAF was a continuous variable, the risk of CHD increased with the elevation of lnSAF level. Stratified analysis showed that in subgroups with overweight (24–28 kg/m2), eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and diabetes mellitus (DM), lnSAF was still significantly correlated with CHD.

Conclusions

In Chinese general population, higher lnSAF is independently associated with increased risk of CHD, and noninvasive SAF holds the potential to be a biomarker for CHD risk evaluation and stratification.

{"title":"Association Between Skin Autofluorescence and Coronary Heart Disease in Chinese General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Qingzheng Wu,&nbsp;Yu Cheng,&nbsp;Hongyan Liu,&nbsp;Yuepeng Wang,&nbsp;Bing Li,&nbsp;Yiming Mu","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between SAF and CHD in the general population of China and to assess the feasibility of SAF used as a predictor of CHD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study was nested within the prospective study REACTION (Cancer Risk Assessment in Chinese Diabetic Population) which included a total of 5806 eligible participants from two communities located in urban Beijing in 2018. SAF were measured using a fluorescence detector (DM Scan). CHD was the study endpoint and was determined by a face-to-face clinical survey. Pearson's correlation analysis, linear regression analysis, and binary logistic regression analysis were used to examine the association between SAF and CHD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The overall prevalence of CHD in the general population was 12.1%. Logistic analysis showed that after full adjustment for confounding factors, the risk of CHD increased significantly with increasing lnSAF quartiles (<i>p</i>-trend &lt; 0.05). Compared to Q1 group, the multivariate adjusted ORs of Q2 and Q3 groups were 1.071 (0.817, 1.404), 1.025 (0.781, 1.344), respectively, and the OR was markedly increased at Q4 (OR = 1.377 [1.043, 1.817]). When lnSAF was a continuous variable, the risk of CHD increased with the elevation of lnSAF level. Stratified analysis showed that in subgroups with overweight (24–28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), eGFR &lt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and diabetes mellitus (DM), lnSAF was still significantly correlated with CHD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In Chinese general population, higher lnSAF is independently associated with increased risk of CHD, and noninvasive SAF holds the potential to be a biomarker for CHD risk evaluation and stratification.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70061","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Diabetes Among 0.98 Million Patients With Stroke/TIA in China: Insights From a Nationwide Cohort Study
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70059
Siqi Chen, Gulbahram Yalkun, Hongqiu Gu, Xin Yang, Chunjuan Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Yilong Wang, Liping Liu, Xia Meng, Yong Jiang, Hao Li, Yongjun Wang, Zixiao Li, Jue Liu, Donghua Mi

Background

A comprehensive epidemiological investigation of the coexistence between diabetes and stroke/TIA in China is urged.

Methods

Data from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance program, a nationwide multi-center registry study, were used to detect the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes among stroke/TIA. The distribution of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes among stroke/TIA patients was investigated, the medical care around diabetes and their respective risk predictors were analyzed, and the association of all above diabetes characteristics with in-hospital death was evaluated using multi-variable Cox regression models.

Results

Of 980 625 patients included, 308 426 (31.5%) had prediabetes, while 365 052 (37.2%) had diabetes, with nearly a third of them undiagnosed (112 969, 30.9%). Of residual aware diabetic patients, 59.0% were treated, with 27.3% controlled. Compared to Han ethnicity, Zhuang ethnicity had a lower prevalence of diabetes (37.3% vs. 35.1%) but were less aware (69.4% vs. 56.5%), treated (59.4% vs. 47.8%), and controlled (27.4% vs. 26.0%). Patients with prediabetes, diagnosed, and undiagnosed diabetes had increasingly higher risks of in-hospital death (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.47 [1.35–1.60]; 2.15 [1.97–2.34]; 4.20 [3.87–4.56], all p < 0.001). Unaware and untreated diabetes were independently associated with in-hospital death (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.99 [1.85–2.14]; 2.84 [2.63–3.07, both p < 0.001]). Compared with controlled diabetes, those with uncontrolled diabetes had a lower risk of in-hospital death (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 0.77[0.68–0.88], p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The findings indicate that over two-thirds of stroke/TIA patients are exposed to diabetes in China, causing higher in-hospital mortality, which should be screened and intervened early.

{"title":"Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Diabetes Among 0.98 Million Patients With Stroke/TIA in China: Insights From a Nationwide Cohort Study","authors":"Siqi Chen,&nbsp;Gulbahram Yalkun,&nbsp;Hongqiu Gu,&nbsp;Xin Yang,&nbsp;Chunjuan Wang,&nbsp;Xingquan Zhao,&nbsp;Yilong Wang,&nbsp;Liping Liu,&nbsp;Xia Meng,&nbsp;Yong Jiang,&nbsp;Hao Li,&nbsp;Yongjun Wang,&nbsp;Zixiao Li,&nbsp;Jue Liu,&nbsp;Donghua Mi","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70059","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A comprehensive epidemiological investigation of the coexistence between diabetes and stroke/TIA in China is urged.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance program, a nationwide multi-center registry study, were used to detect the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes among stroke/TIA. The distribution of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes among stroke/TIA patients was investigated, the medical care around diabetes and their respective risk predictors were analyzed, and the association of all above diabetes characteristics with in-hospital death was evaluated using multi-variable Cox regression models.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 980 625 patients included, 308 426 (31.5%) had prediabetes, while 365 052 (37.2%) had diabetes, with nearly a third of them undiagnosed (112 969, 30.9%). Of residual aware diabetic patients, 59.0% were treated, with 27.3% controlled. Compared to Han ethnicity, Zhuang ethnicity had a lower prevalence of diabetes (37.3% vs. 35.1%) but were less aware (69.4% vs. 56.5%), treated (59.4% vs. 47.8%), and controlled (27.4% vs. 26.0%). Patients with prediabetes, diagnosed, and undiagnosed diabetes had increasingly higher risks of in-hospital death (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.47 [1.35–1.60]; 2.15 [1.97–2.34]; 4.20 [3.87–4.56], all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Unaware and untreated diabetes were independently associated with in-hospital death (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.99 [1.85–2.14]; 2.84 [2.63–3.07, both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]). Compared with controlled diabetes, those with uncontrolled diabetes had a lower risk of in-hospital death (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 0.77[0.68–0.88], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The findings indicate that over two-thirds of stroke/TIA patients are exposed to diabetes in China, causing higher in-hospital mortality, which should be screened and intervened early.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70059","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Diabetes
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1