Salience theory, investor sentiment, and commonality in sentiment: Evidence from the Chinese stock market

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100934
Zhijun Hu , Ping-Wen Sun
{"title":"Salience theory, investor sentiment, and commonality in sentiment: Evidence from the Chinese stock market","authors":"Zhijun Hu ,&nbsp;Ping-Wen Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investors pay more attention to a stock when the absolute return difference between the stock and the market is substantial, and consequently investors overweight this salience attribute when assessing the expected payoff from the stock. We demonstrate that the salience theory measure, which reflects this phenomenon, serves as a reliable proxy for firm-level investor sentiment and that the aggregate salience theory measure effectively represents market investor sentiment in the Chinese stock market. Furthermore, our findings reveal that the quintile portfolio with salient upsides underperforms the one with salient downsides by 1.26% (1.19% after risk adjustment) per month from 2002 to 2021. Moreover, we illustrate that the investor sentiment component of the salience theory measure significantly contributes to the negative salience premium. Finally, we provide evidence that the commonality in sentiment is priced significantly and positively, even after we control for the salience theory measure, firm risk characteristics, and lottery characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100934"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investors pay more attention to a stock when the absolute return difference between the stock and the market is substantial, and consequently investors overweight this salience attribute when assessing the expected payoff from the stock. We demonstrate that the salience theory measure, which reflects this phenomenon, serves as a reliable proxy for firm-level investor sentiment and that the aggregate salience theory measure effectively represents market investor sentiment in the Chinese stock market. Furthermore, our findings reveal that the quintile portfolio with salient upsides underperforms the one with salient downsides by 1.26% (1.19% after risk adjustment) per month from 2002 to 2021. Moreover, we illustrate that the investor sentiment component of the salience theory measure significantly contributes to the negative salience premium. Finally, we provide evidence that the commonality in sentiment is priced significantly and positively, even after we control for the salience theory measure, firm risk characteristics, and lottery characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
显著性理论、投资者情绪和情绪的共性:来自中国股市的证据
当股票与市场的绝对收益差异较大时,投资者会更加关注该股票,因此投资者在评估股票的预期收益时会过重考虑该股票的显著性属性。我们的研究表明,反映这一现象的显著性理论指标是公司层面投资者情绪的可靠替代指标,而总体显著性理论指标则有效地代表了中国股市的市场投资者情绪。此外,我们的研究结果表明,从 2002 年到 2021 年,上升显著的五分位投资组合每月跑输下降显著的五分位投资组合 1.26%(风险调整后为 1.19%)。此外,我们还说明,显著性理论衡量指标中的投资者情绪部分在很大程度上导致了负的显著性溢价。最后,我们提供的证据表明,即使在我们控制了显著性理论衡量标准、公司风险特征和彩票特征之后,投资者情绪的共性也会被显著正向定价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Experimental Finance represent lenses and approaches through which we can view financial decision-making. The aim of the journal is to publish high quality research in all fields of finance, where such research is carried out with a behavioral perspective and / or is carried out via experimental methods. It is open to but not limited to papers which cover investigations of biases, the role of various neurological markers in financial decision making, national and organizational culture as it impacts financial decision making, sentiment and asset pricing, the design and implementation of experiments to investigate financial decision making and trading, methodological experiments, and natural experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance welcomes full-length and short letter papers in the area of behavioral finance and experimental finance. The focus is on rapid dissemination of high-impact research in these areas.
期刊最新文献
Riding the waves of investor sentiment: Cryptocurrency price and renewable energy volatility during the pandemic-war era Investor horizon, experience, and the disposition effect What makes depression babies different: Expectations or preferences? Luck in high-stakes firm lottery allocation: A natural experimental test of Coasean efficiency and invariance in a prominent sport finance setting Religion and household saving behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1