Dosage effects of psychodynamic and schema therapy in people with comorbid depression and personality disorder: four-arm pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Marit Kool, Henricus Van, Arnoud Arntz, Anna Bartak, Jaap Peen, Linda Dil, Katinka de Boer, Jack Dekker
{"title":"Dosage effects of psychodynamic and schema therapy in people with comorbid depression and personality disorder: four-arm pragmatic randomised controlled trial","authors":"Marit Kool, Henricus Van, Arnoud Arntz, Anna Bartak, Jaap Peen, Linda Dil, Katinka de Boer, Jack Dekker","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Higher intensity of psychotherapy might improve treatment outcome in depression, especially in those with comorbid personality disorder.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To compare the effects of 25 individual sessions (weekly) of two forms of psychotherapy – short-term psychoanalytic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) and schema therapy – with the same treatments given for 50 sessions (twice weekly) in people with depression and personality disorder. Trial registration: NTR5941.</p><span>Method</span><p>We conducted a pragmatic, double-randomised clinical trial and, over 37 months, recruited 246 adult out-patients with comorbid depression/dysthymia and personality disorder. A 2 × 2 factorial design randomised participants to 25 or 50 sessions of SPSP or schema therapy. The primary outcome was change in depression severity over 1 year on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). Secondary outcomes were remission both of depression and personality disorder.</p><span>Results</span><p>Compared with 25 sessions, participants who received 50 sessions showed a significantly greater decrease in depressive symptoms over time (time × session dosage, <span>P</span> &lt; 0.001), with a mean difference of 5.6 BDI points after 1 year (<span>d =</span> −0.53, 95% CI −0.18 to 0.882, <span>P</span> = 0.003). Remission from depression was also greater in the 50-session group (74% <span>v.</span> 58%, <span>P</span> = 0.025), as was remission of personality disorder (74% <span>v.</span> 56%, <span>P =</span> 0.010).</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Greater intensity of psychotherapy leads to better outcomes of both depression and personality status in people with comorbid depression and personality disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"248 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Higher intensity of psychotherapy might improve treatment outcome in depression, especially in those with comorbid personality disorder.

Aims

To compare the effects of 25 individual sessions (weekly) of two forms of psychotherapy – short-term psychoanalytic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) and schema therapy – with the same treatments given for 50 sessions (twice weekly) in people with depression and personality disorder. Trial registration: NTR5941.

Method

We conducted a pragmatic, double-randomised clinical trial and, over 37 months, recruited 246 adult out-patients with comorbid depression/dysthymia and personality disorder. A 2 × 2 factorial design randomised participants to 25 or 50 sessions of SPSP or schema therapy. The primary outcome was change in depression severity over 1 year on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). Secondary outcomes were remission both of depression and personality disorder.

Results

Compared with 25 sessions, participants who received 50 sessions showed a significantly greater decrease in depressive symptoms over time (time × session dosage, P < 0.001), with a mean difference of 5.6 BDI points after 1 year (d = −0.53, 95% CI −0.18 to 0.882, P = 0.003). Remission from depression was also greater in the 50-session group (74% v. 58%, P = 0.025), as was remission of personality disorder (74% v. 56%, P = 0.010).

Conclusions

Greater intensity of psychotherapy leads to better outcomes of both depression and personality status in people with comorbid depression and personality disorder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理动力学疗法和模式疗法对合并抑郁症和人格障碍患者的剂量效应:四臂实用随机对照试验
背景更高强度的心理治疗可能会改善抑郁症的治疗效果,尤其是对那些合并有人格障碍的患者。目的比较两种心理治疗形式--短期精神分析支持性心理治疗(SPSP)和模式疗法--的25次个别疗程(每周一次)与50次疗程(每周两次)对抑郁症和人格障碍患者的相同治疗效果。试验注册:NTR5941.方法我们开展了一项务实的双随机临床试验,历时 37 个月,共招募了 246 名合并有抑郁症/癔症和人格障碍的成年门诊患者。我们采用 2 × 2 的因子设计,将参与者随机分配到 25 或 50 个疗程的 SPSP 或模式疗法中。主要结果是贝克抑郁量表 II (BDI-II) 一年内抑郁严重程度的变化。结果与接受 25 次治疗的参与者相比,接受 50 次治疗的参与者的抑郁症状随着时间的推移明显减轻(时间 × 治疗次数,P < 0.001),1 年后的 BDI 平均值相差 5.6 分(d = -0.53,95% CI -0.18 至 0.882,P = 0.003)。50次治疗组的抑郁症缓解率也更高(74% 对 58%,P = 0.025),人格障碍的缓解率也更高(74% 对 56%,P = 0.010)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A brief critique of the pseudo-diagnosis ‘complex emotional needs’ Transdiagnostic use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted therapy to treat obsessive–compulsive disorder Professorships in child and adolescent psychiatry relative to a similarly sized medical specialty in the UK and Ireland: cross-sectional study Neural processes linking joint hypermobility and anxiety: key roles for the amygdala and insular cortex Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and self-harm/suicide ideation: population wide, data linkage study and time series analysis: Commentary, Patra et al
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1