The interplay between subcortical and prefrontal brain structures in shaping ideological belief formation and updating

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101385
Dezső Németh , Teodóra Vékony , Gábor Orosz , Zoltán Sarnyai , Leor Zmigrod
{"title":"The interplay between subcortical and prefrontal brain structures in shaping ideological belief formation and updating","authors":"Dezső Németh ,&nbsp;Teodóra Vékony ,&nbsp;Gábor Orosz ,&nbsp;Zoltán Sarnyai ,&nbsp;Leor Zmigrod","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>History illustrates that economic crises and other sociopolitical threats often lead to a rise of polarization and radicalism, whereby people become more susceptible to intolerant political messages, including propaganda and ideological rhetoric. Political science, sociology, economics, and psychology have explored many dimensions of this phenomenon, yet a critical piece of the puzzle is still missing: what cognitive and neural mechanisms in the brain mediate between these threats and responsiveness to political messages? To answer this question, here, we present a theory that combines cognitive neuroscience theories, namely stress-induced memory shift and competitive cognitive processes, with political science. Our Threat-based Neural Switch Theory posits that the processing of political information, similarly to other information processing, is shaped by the competitive interaction between goal-directed and habitual processes. Threats, including resource overload or scarcity, can shift neural networks toward receptiveness to oversimplified political messages. This theory sets out a research program aimed at discovering the cognitive and neural underpinning of how situational factors alter brain functions and modify political information processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624000366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History illustrates that economic crises and other sociopolitical threats often lead to a rise of polarization and radicalism, whereby people become more susceptible to intolerant political messages, including propaganda and ideological rhetoric. Political science, sociology, economics, and psychology have explored many dimensions of this phenomenon, yet a critical piece of the puzzle is still missing: what cognitive and neural mechanisms in the brain mediate between these threats and responsiveness to political messages? To answer this question, here, we present a theory that combines cognitive neuroscience theories, namely stress-induced memory shift and competitive cognitive processes, with political science. Our Threat-based Neural Switch Theory posits that the processing of political information, similarly to other information processing, is shaped by the competitive interaction between goal-directed and habitual processes. Threats, including resource overload or scarcity, can shift neural networks toward receptiveness to oversimplified political messages. This theory sets out a research program aimed at discovering the cognitive and neural underpinning of how situational factors alter brain functions and modify political information processing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮层下和前额叶大脑结构在形成和更新意识形态信念中的相互作用
历史表明,经济危机和其他社会政治威胁往往会导致两极分化和激进主义的抬头,从而使人们更容易接受不宽容的政治信息,包括宣传和意识形态言论。政治学、社会学、经济学和心理学对这一现象进行了多方面的探讨,但仍缺少一个关键的谜题:在这些威胁和对政治信息的反应之间,大脑中的哪些认知和神经机制起着中介作用?为了回答这个问题,我们在此提出一种理论,将认知神经科学理论(即压力诱导的记忆转换和竞争性认知过程)与政治科学相结合。我们的 "基于威胁的神经转换理论 "认为,政治信息的处理与其他信息的处理类似,是由目标导向过程和习惯过程之间的竞争性互动所决定的。包括资源超载或稀缺在内的威胁会使神经网络转向接受过于简化的政治信息。这一理论提出了一个研究计划,旨在发现情景因素如何改变大脑功能并改变政治信息处理的认知和神经基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
A light at the end of the axon: genetically encoded fluorescent indicators shine light on the dopamine system Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions From sensory motor and perceptual development to primary consciousness in the fetus: converging neural, behavioral, and imaging correlates of cognition-mediated emergent transitions Nonsynaptic encoding of behavior by neuropeptides Stress-free indulgence: indulge adaptively to promote goal pursuit and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1