Putting your money where your mouth is: Accelerating investment action for healthy and sustainable food systems in Australia

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102620
Ella Robinson , Christine Parker , Rachel Carey , Anita Foerster , Miranda Blake , Katherine Sievert , Gary Sacks
{"title":"Putting your money where your mouth is: Accelerating investment action for healthy and sustainable food systems in Australia","authors":"Ella Robinson ,&nbsp;Christine Parker ,&nbsp;Rachel Carey ,&nbsp;Anita Foerster ,&nbsp;Miranda Blake ,&nbsp;Katherine Sievert ,&nbsp;Gary Sacks","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Institutional investors have considerable potential to positively contribute to shifts towards healthier, more sustainable food systems. However, food systems issues are not systematically taken into account by investors as part of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations. This study aimed to identify current approaches to investment decision making regarding food systems issues and ways to facilitate increased consideration of food systems issues as part of investment decision-making in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted focus groups (15 participants) supplemented by in-depth interviews (19 participants) with financial sector and related civil society stakeholders. Data was thematically analysed, guided by an investment decision-making framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants saw opportunity to include food systems issues as part of investment decision-making processes, including screening, engagement and divestment. Greater investor action could be accelerated by a clear investment case for action; cohesive metrics and reporting; and strong advocacy and coalition building.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Holistic incorporation of food systems issues as part of ESG considerations has substantial potential to drive positive food systems transformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102620"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Institutional investors have considerable potential to positively contribute to shifts towards healthier, more sustainable food systems. However, food systems issues are not systematically taken into account by investors as part of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations. This study aimed to identify current approaches to investment decision making regarding food systems issues and ways to facilitate increased consideration of food systems issues as part of investment decision-making in Australia.

Methods

We conducted focus groups (15 participants) supplemented by in-depth interviews (19 participants) with financial sector and related civil society stakeholders. Data was thematically analysed, guided by an investment decision-making framework.

Results

Participants saw opportunity to include food systems issues as part of investment decision-making processes, including screening, engagement and divestment. Greater investor action could be accelerated by a clear investment case for action; cohesive metrics and reporting; and strong advocacy and coalition building.

Conclusion

Holistic incorporation of food systems issues as part of ESG considerations has substantial potential to drive positive food systems transformation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
把钱用在刀刃上:加快澳大利亚健康和可持续食品系统的投资行动
导言:机构投资者在积极推动向更健康、更可持续的食品体系转变方面具有相当大的潜力。然而,投资者并未将粮食系统问题作为环境、社会和治理(ESG)考虑因素的一部分加以系统考虑。本研究旨在确定当前有关食品系统问题的投资决策方法,以及如何促进在澳大利亚的投资决策中更多地考虑食品系统问题。方法我们与金融部门和相关的民间社会利益相关者进行了焦点小组讨论(15 人参加),并进行了深入访谈(19 人参加)。在投资决策框架的指导下,对数据进行了专题分析。结果参与者认为有机会将粮食系统问题作为投资决策过程的一部分,包括筛选、参与和撤资。明确的投资行动案例、统一的衡量标准和报告以及强有力的宣传和联盟建设可以加快投资者采取更多行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Viewpoint: Toward a sustainable Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of maize and rice Expanding the phytosanitary exclusion zone for Mexican avocados: Market impacts and unintended consequences Small wins in practice: Learnings from 16 European initiatives working towards the transformation of urban food systems Information interventions and willingness to pay for PICS bags: Evidence from Sierra Leone Do moral constraints and government interventions promote the willingness and behaviors of food saving among urban residents in China? An empirical study based on structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1