Practical modelling of sand transport and beach profile evolution in the swash zone

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104514
Weiqiu Chen , Jebbe J. van der Werf , Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher
{"title":"Practical modelling of sand transport and beach profile evolution in the swash zone","authors":"Weiqiu Chen ,&nbsp;Jebbe J. van der Werf ,&nbsp;Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A proper prediction of the cross-shore profile evolution in the swash zone at time scales of days to years is important for evaluating beach management scenarios. However, this practical prediction is challenging due to a limited understanding of the complex physical processes in the swash zone. A quantitative evaluation of three existing practical swash-zone sand transport models, i.e. the Larson formula, the Van Rijn distribution model and the Karambas formula, has been conducted in this study. Measured net sand transport rates and beach profiles in seven large-scale flume tests, both low-energy accretive and high-energy erosive wave conditions, are used to assess these three models. Model performance is quantitatively evaluated with the Brier Skill Score (<span><math><mrow><mi>B</mi><mi>S</mi><mi>S</mi></mrow></math></span>), Root Mean Square Error (<span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>M</mi><mi>S</mi><mi>E</mi></mrow></math></span>) and erosive/accretive volume. Overall, the Larson model shows the best performance. Nevertheless, the Larson model cannot capture the shoreline change, as it is assumed only valid for the higher part of the swash zone above the still water level (SWL). Additionally, it fails to predict the accretion in the upper swash zone during high-energy erosive conditions. Thus, two improvements are made for the Larson model by (1) extending the application of the Larson model from the still water level towards the run-down limit and by (2) developing shape functions for the equilibrium bed slope in the swash zone. The improved model is validated using six other large-scale wave flume tests. Results demonstrate that the improved Larson model works better than the original Larson model in predicting the profile evolution, shoreline change and total accretion/erosion volume in the swash zone. The improved model shows the potential to be coupled with wave-averaged morphological models for the nearshore zone to predict long-term evolutions of the entire beach profile.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924000620/pdfft?md5=6623f516d1a984e73583032cc5c563d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0378383924000620-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A proper prediction of the cross-shore profile evolution in the swash zone at time scales of days to years is important for evaluating beach management scenarios. However, this practical prediction is challenging due to a limited understanding of the complex physical processes in the swash zone. A quantitative evaluation of three existing practical swash-zone sand transport models, i.e. the Larson formula, the Van Rijn distribution model and the Karambas formula, has been conducted in this study. Measured net sand transport rates and beach profiles in seven large-scale flume tests, both low-energy accretive and high-energy erosive wave conditions, are used to assess these three models. Model performance is quantitatively evaluated with the Brier Skill Score (BSS), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and erosive/accretive volume. Overall, the Larson model shows the best performance. Nevertheless, the Larson model cannot capture the shoreline change, as it is assumed only valid for the higher part of the swash zone above the still water level (SWL). Additionally, it fails to predict the accretion in the upper swash zone during high-energy erosive conditions. Thus, two improvements are made for the Larson model by (1) extending the application of the Larson model from the still water level towards the run-down limit and by (2) developing shape functions for the equilibrium bed slope in the swash zone. The improved model is validated using six other large-scale wave flume tests. Results demonstrate that the improved Larson model works better than the original Larson model in predicting the profile evolution, shoreline change and total accretion/erosion volume in the swash zone. The improved model shows the potential to be coupled with wave-averaged morphological models for the nearshore zone to predict long-term evolutions of the entire beach profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斜流区内泥沙输送和海滩剖面演变的实用建模
在数天到数年的时间尺度上对斜滩区的跨岸剖面演变进行适当预测,对于评估海滩管理方案非常重要。然而,由于对斜滩区复杂物理过程的了解有限,这种实际预测具有挑战性。本研究对现有的三种实用沼泽区输沙模型(即拉森公式、范里恩分布模型和卡兰巴斯公式)进行了定量评估。在 7 个大型水槽试验中(包括低能量增生和高能量侵蚀波浪条件)测量的净输沙率和海滩剖面用于评估这三个模型。模型性能通过布赖尔技能得分(BSS)、均方根误差(RMSE)和侵蚀/喷涌量进行定量评估。总体而言,拉森模型的性能最佳。不过,拉森模型无法捕捉到海岸线的变化,因为它只适用于静止水位(SWL)以上的斜流区域的较高部分。此外,在高能侵蚀条件下,该模型也无法预测斜流区上部的增生。因此,我们对 Larson 模型进行了两方面的改进:(1) 将 Larson 模型的应用范围从静止水位扩大到下泄极限;(2) 为斜流区内的平衡河床坡度开发形状函数。改进后的模型通过其他六个大型波浪水槽试验进行了验证。结果表明,改进后的拉森模型在预测冲刷区的剖面演变、海岸线变化和总增生/侵蚀量方面比原始拉森模型更有效。改进后的模型显示了与近岸区波浪平均形态模型相结合预测整个海滩剖面长期演变的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
期刊最新文献
An enhanced model for an extreme wave impacting a vertical cylinder An adaptive internal mass source wave-maker for short wave generation Convergence and divergence of storm waves induced by multi-scale currents: Observations and coupled wave-current modeling Wave overtopping discharges at rubble mound structures in shallow water Computations of energetic nearshore waves: Are weakly dispersive phase-resolving models telling the same story?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1