A thematic content analysis of views regarding sexual assault disclosure and the #MeToo/WeToo movements for CALD Japanese women in Australia

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102898
Kaoru Sato , Lynlee Howard-Payne
{"title":"A thematic content analysis of views regarding sexual assault disclosure and the #MeToo/WeToo movements for CALD Japanese women in Australia","authors":"Kaoru Sato ,&nbsp;Lynlee Howard-Payne","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds in Australia may be unlikely to disclose sexual assault, due to the social norms in their home countries. Due to varying degrees of acculturation, Japanese residents of Australia may be influenced by Japanese norms. The Australian government acknowledges that targeted responses may be needed to support CALD women disclose sexual assault, yet research on this area is scarce. This study explores the views of CALD Japanese women living in Australia regarding sexual assault disclosure and the #MeToo and #WeToo movements. A thematic content analysis of interviews with eight CALD Japanese women revealed that their views on sexual assault disclosure were dominated by two opposing themes, <em>Systemic Avoidance</em> and <em>Empowerment through Social Activism</em>, which were informed by the degree to which they upheld Hofstede's individualism, masculinity, and power distance cultural values. Our findings may help policy makers develop culturally nuanced approaches to encourage the disclosure of sexual violence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524000360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds in Australia may be unlikely to disclose sexual assault, due to the social norms in their home countries. Due to varying degrees of acculturation, Japanese residents of Australia may be influenced by Japanese norms. The Australian government acknowledges that targeted responses may be needed to support CALD women disclose sexual assault, yet research on this area is scarce. This study explores the views of CALD Japanese women living in Australia regarding sexual assault disclosure and the #MeToo and #WeToo movements. A thematic content analysis of interviews with eight CALD Japanese women revealed that their views on sexual assault disclosure were dominated by two opposing themes, Systemic Avoidance and Empowerment through Social Activism, which were informed by the degree to which they upheld Hofstede's individualism, masculinity, and power distance cultural values. Our findings may help policy makers develop culturally nuanced approaches to encourage the disclosure of sexual violence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对澳大利亚 CALD 日本妇女有关性侵犯披露和 #MeToo/WeToo 运动的观点进行主题内容分析
在澳大利亚,来自不同文化和语言背景(CALD)的女性可能不太可能揭露性侵犯行为,这是由于她们本国的社会规范所致。由于文化适应程度不同,澳大利亚的日本居民可能会受到日本规范的影响。澳大利亚政府承认,可能需要采取有针对性的应对措施来支持 CALD 妇女披露性侵犯,但这方面的研究却很少。本研究探讨了居住在澳大利亚的 CALD 日本女性对性侵犯披露以及 #MeToo 和 #WeToo 运动的看法。通过对八名 CALD 日本女性的访谈内容进行主题分析,发现她们对性侵害披露的看法主要受两个对立主题的支配,即系统性回避和通过社会活动赋权,而这两个主题又与她们对霍夫斯泰德(Hofstede)的个人主义、男子气概和权力距离文化价值观的支持程度有关。我们的研究结果可能会帮助政策制定者们制定出在文化上有细微差别的方法来鼓励披露性暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Challenging the status quo: A feminist analysis of gender dynamics, motivation, and empowerment in hackathons Thirty years of gender mainstreaming: Evolution, development, and future research agenda through a bibliometric approach How the online presence of mothers changed over time during the COVID pandemic: A longitudinal study Anti-genderism in Turkey: Masculinist entrenchment through cultural intimacies Montenegrin gender ‘protections’ and the limits of gender equality laws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1