Potential of cold-atom airborne gravimetry to improve coastal gravity field and quasigeoid modelling

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01839-0
Dinh Toan Vu, Sylvain Bonvalot, Lucia Seoane, Germinal Gabalda, Dominique Remy, Sean Bruinsma, Yannick Bidel, Alexandre Bresson, Nassim Zahzam, Didier Rouxel, Corinne Salaün, Marie-Françoise Lalancette, René Forsberg, Tim Jensen, Olivier Jamet
{"title":"Potential of cold-atom airborne gravimetry to improve coastal gravity field and quasigeoid modelling","authors":"Dinh Toan Vu, Sylvain Bonvalot, Lucia Seoane, Germinal Gabalda, Dominique Remy, Sean Bruinsma, Yannick Bidel, Alexandre Bresson, Nassim Zahzam, Didier Rouxel, Corinne Salaün, Marie-Françoise Lalancette, René Forsberg, Tim Jensen, Olivier Jamet","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01839-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate using the GIRAFE cold-atom gravimeter during an airborne gravity survey for improving gravity field and quasigeoid modelling. The study is conducted over the Bay of Biscay, France. Geoid/quasigeoid determination is usually a major challenge over such coastal areas due to scarce and inconsistent gravity data. In a first step, the GIRAFE dataset is analysed and compared with available surface gravity data as well as with global altimetry models from UCSD and DTU. The comparisons indicate that the DTU model is better than the UCSD model within around 10 km from the coastline. Furthermore, recent satellite altimeter missions significantly improve the altimetry models in coastal areas. A significant bias (− 4.00 mGal) in shipborne data is also found from this comparison. In a second step, eight quasigeoid solutions are calculated to evaluate the contribution of GIRAFE data. This contribution reaches 3 cm in terms of height anomaly for DTU21 while being much larger for UCSDv31 and shipborne data. Finally, the quasigeoid solutions are validated using GNSS-levelling data. The results indicate that using GIRAFE data improves by approximately 50% the quality of quasigeoid models over land near the coast. The highest accuracy, around 1 cm, is achieved when GIRAFE data are merged with refined gravity data. Importantly, the standard deviation is just 1.2 cm when compared with GNSS-levelling points if using only GIRAFE data over marine areas, which is very close to the 1 cm goal of geoid/quasigeoid model determination in modern geodesy. This study thus confirms the benefits of performing airborne gravity survey using quantum sensors.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"171 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01839-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate using the GIRAFE cold-atom gravimeter during an airborne gravity survey for improving gravity field and quasigeoid modelling. The study is conducted over the Bay of Biscay, France. Geoid/quasigeoid determination is usually a major challenge over such coastal areas due to scarce and inconsistent gravity data. In a first step, the GIRAFE dataset is analysed and compared with available surface gravity data as well as with global altimetry models from UCSD and DTU. The comparisons indicate that the DTU model is better than the UCSD model within around 10 km from the coastline. Furthermore, recent satellite altimeter missions significantly improve the altimetry models in coastal areas. A significant bias (− 4.00 mGal) in shipborne data is also found from this comparison. In a second step, eight quasigeoid solutions are calculated to evaluate the contribution of GIRAFE data. This contribution reaches 3 cm in terms of height anomaly for DTU21 while being much larger for UCSDv31 and shipborne data. Finally, the quasigeoid solutions are validated using GNSS-levelling data. The results indicate that using GIRAFE data improves by approximately 50% the quality of quasigeoid models over land near the coast. The highest accuracy, around 1 cm, is achieved when GIRAFE data are merged with refined gravity data. Importantly, the standard deviation is just 1.2 cm when compared with GNSS-levelling points if using only GIRAFE data over marine areas, which is very close to the 1 cm goal of geoid/quasigeoid model determination in modern geodesy. This study thus confirms the benefits of performing airborne gravity survey using quantum sensors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷原子机载重力测量法改进沿岸重力场和类地行星建模的潜力
我们研究了在机载重力勘测中使用 GIRAFE 冷原子重力仪改进重力场和类地行星建模的问题。研究在法国比斯开湾上空进行。由于重力数据稀少且不一致,在此类沿海地区确定大地水准面/类大地水准面通常是一项重大挑战。首先,对 GIRAFE 数据集进行了分析,并与现有的地表重力数据以及加州大学圣地亚哥分校和德累斯顿大学的全球测高模型进行了比较。比较结果表明,在距海岸线约 10 公里范围内,DTU 模型优于 UCSD 模型。此外,最近的卫星测高任务大大改进了沿海地区的测高模式。通过比较,还发现船载数据存在明显偏差(- 4.00 mGal)。第二步,计算 8 个准大地水准面解,以评估 GIRAFE 数据的贡献。就高度异常而言,DTU21 的贡献达到 3 厘米,而 UCSDv31 和船载数据的贡献要大得多。最后,利用全球导航卫星系统的水准测量数据对准大地水准面解决方案进行了验证。结果表明,使用 GIRAFE 数据可使海岸附近陆地上的准大地水准面模型质量提高约 50%。当 GIRAFE 数据与精炼重力数据合并时,精度最高,约为 1 厘米。重要的是,如果在海洋区域仅使用 GIRAFE 数据,与全球导航卫星系统水准点相比,标准偏差仅为 1.2 厘米,非常接近现代大地测量中确定大地水准面/准大地水准面模型的 1 厘米目标。因此,这项研究证实了使用量子传感器进行机载重力测量的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Modified Bayesian method for simultaneously imaging fault geometry and slip distribution with reduced uncertainty, applied to 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging Spherical radial basis functions model: approximating an integral functional of an isotropic Gaussian random field Capture of coseismic velocity waveform using GNSS raw Doppler and carrier phase data for enhancing shaking intensity estimation Derivation of the Sagnac (Earth-rotation) correction and analysis of its accuracy for GNSS applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1